PC 79-148RESOLUTION N0. PC79-14d
A RESOLUTION Of TIIE ANAHEIM C17Y PLANNING COHNISSION
THA.T PETITION FOR RECLASSIFILA710N N0. 79-80-5 BE DENIED.
MHEREAS, the Anahelm Lity Planning Commission diA reccive a verified
petition for Reclassification from TEXACO-ANAHEIM NILLS, INC., 38o Anahcim Hills
Road, Anaheim, California 92807, owner, and LIqD 6 HILLERUO, IIIC., 2065 Hun[ington
Drive, San Marino. California ?1108, agent, of certain rcal property s(tuated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California. described as follows:
That portton of the land atlotted to Juan Pabio Peralta, Maria
Jesus Peralta de Copas. and Marla Peral[a dc Alvarez, as described
in the Fina) Decree of Partition of the Rancho San[Iago de Santa
Ana, which was entcred September 12, 1868 in book "E". pagc 410 of
Judgments of thc Dis[rict Court of thc 17th Judtcial Distric[ ln
and for Los Angeles County. California. morc particularly shrnm as
Parcel 3 on a map fited in book 127, pagPs 9, 10, 11 and 12 of
Parcel Maps, records of Orange Lounty, California. beTng
subdivided as Tract No. 8117.
NHEREAS. the City Planning Commfssion did schedule a public hearing at the
City Hall in the C1ty of Anaheim on Juty 16, 147°. a[ 1:3~ p.m.. notice of saTd
pu6lic hearing having been duly given as required by law and ln accordance Hith the
provislons of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 19.03. to hear and consider
evidence for and aaainst said proposed reclassificatlon and to investigace and make
findings and recommendations in connection [herewith; said public hearing having been
continued to thc Plannfng Lommission meetfny of July 3~, 1?79; and
11HEREAS, said Commission aftcr due inspection, invcstigatton and s[udy madc
by itself and in Its behalf~ and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearinq. dces flnd and determine the following facts:
1, That the pe[Itioner proposes reclassification of subJect property from
the RS-A-43,000(SL) (ResidenCial/Agrlcui[ur~I - Scenic CorriJor Gveriay) Zone to the
RM-3000(SC) (Residenttal, Multiple-Family - Scenic ~orrtdor Overlay) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subJect property for hillside,
low-density residential land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassificatlon Is hereby dented on the basls that
the property ls not suitablc for a higher dens(ty residential developmcnt than was
originally proposed (RS-A-43.000(SC) zoning); tha[ thc traffic generated by the
proposal would crea[e potential traffic hazards with the increased volume and parked
vehTcles; and that [he increased populatton would create potential problems Nith
additional school children~ additlonal electric uttlity requTrements and an adverse
affect on the air quality.
PC79-148
4. Tha[ thc proposed reclassification of subJect propcr[y is not neccssary
and/or desirablc for thc ordcrly and propcr ~evelopment of thc community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subJect property does not
properly relate to ttie aones and thetr permitted uses locally established tn close
proximity to subJeet propcr[y and to the zones and their pcrmttted uses generaliy
established throughout the community.
G. That 1 person tndica[ed their presence at satd public hearing In
opposition; and that no correspondence r~is recelved tn opposition to the subject
petitJon.
E~d~'IRCHNEIlTAL IHPACT FI!1DING: That the Anaheim Ci[y P1anning Comntssion has
revicvied Addendum No. Z to Environnr_ntal impact Report !~o. 2~3 for 7enta[ive Map of
Tract No. 211G (P.evision t~o. 4) and Tentative '1ap of Tract l~o. 2T17 (Revision Ito. 4)
and has considered chis date the evldence. both written and oral, having been
presen[ed to supplenen[ Addendum No. 2 to Environnental Inpact Reaort I~o. 1.D3, finds
that potential environnental tapacts of the projec[ may 6e reduced [o an
insignificant level by conforriance Nith Lity plans. policies and ordtnances; and
Addendum ~~o. 2 to Envfronnen[al Impact Report flo. 2D3 ls in compiTance with [he
Californta Envtronmental Quality Ac: and uith City and Statc EIR Gutdelines and thc
Anahcin City Planning Camisslon docs. therefore, basrd upon the abovc Information,
cer[ify Addendum Ho, 2 to Envtronnental impact ~lo, 2(?3,
does hereby~ dcnyREsu~bJecteEPetitionsOfor~ Recfasstficatlon ConY therrbasis ofssthe
aforenentioned flndings,
TNE FOREr01NG RESOLUTIOt~ ts signed and approved by ne this 3^th day of Ju1y,
197°.
ATTEST:
~'~o~ /y . . ~
HA RKhN, AtrANE1M CI Y AnNlrrr., C9'!"115510N
( ~^~. ~ w •
SECRETARY, A-IAHEIM CITY PLANN~NG COM!115510t~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
LOUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHE~M )
1, Edith L. Harris~ Secretary of [he Anahein City Planning Cammissto~~ do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolu[ton was oassed a~~' adopted a[ a meeting of
the Anahcim CTty Planning Cor~mfsston hcld on July 30, 197~~ by ihc following vote of
the membcrs thereof:
AYES: LOMNISSIONERS: BARNES~ BUSNORE, NERAST, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: DAUID, KING
A95ENT: COyMISSI0NER5: FRY
IN WITNESS NHEREOF, I have hcreunto sct my hand [his 30th day of July~ 1g79,
`~O ~icial •~ ~l.r,ti,~d,
SECRETAR , ANAHEIM CITY FIANNING CO'1MISSION
-2- PC79-148