PC 79-149RESOLUTION N0. PC 79'149
A RESOLUTIOH OF 7HE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIt~G COMMISSION
THAT PETITIOl1 FOP. V~RIANCE t70. 3~05 BE DENIED
WNEREAS, the Anaheim City Plannino CommTssion did reccivc a verificd
Petition for Varlance from TEXACO-ANAHEIN HILLS, INC.. 3~~ Anaheim Hllls Road,
Anahcim. California 92807, owncr, and LIt~D G NILLERUD, INC.. 20~5 Huntinton Drive,
San Marino. Californla 92714~ agent, of certain real property situated in the City of
Anahcim. County of Orange. State of Caltfornia described as:
Jesus Peralta defCopas, anddHariatPeraltaJdenAlverezPeas'described
in the Final Decree of Partition of the Rancho Santiago de Sania
qna. Hhich was entered Sepicmber 12, 1868 in book "E", page 410 of
Judgmer.ts of the Distric[ Court of the 17th Judlcial Dtstrict in
and for Los Angcles County, CalTfornia, more particularly shown as
Parcel 3 0~ a map filed in book 127, pages 9. ». ~1 and 12 of
Parcel Maps. records of Orange County, California, being
subdivided as 7raet No. 8117.
WHER£A5. the Ci[y Planniny Lx.^tssien dTd schedule a Dublic hearing at the
City Ha11 in the Clty of Anahei~ on July 15~ 1979. at 1:30 p.n.. notice of sald
public hearing havin9 been duly given as required by law and in accardance with the
provisions of thc Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 12.03, to hear and tonslder
evidence for and ~gainst said proposed variance and to investigate a~d make findings
and recommendations in connection therewith; said public hearing havin~ been
continued co the Planning Casnission meeting of July 3~. ~°79~ ~nd
NHER~AS, said Lonmission, after duc inspection~ invcstigation and study ma~le
OfPCfGd,OLaSa~dnft~a~Ingha~GCSaEaR~fSRL~ ~eLerTln~dchetfollorl~a,facts~:nce and reports
i, That the pecitioncr proposes waiver of the followin9 to establish a°9~
unit condanintum subdivision:
SECTION 16.31.062.012 - M~axs~nqletrami~ra~esldentialtzoni~n ~ feet
one stor permitte ;
two stor~s proposed)
2, That the proposed variance is hereby denled on the basis that the
Corji-idoriVeOverlay~ifzonl~gn wasP~deniedM ando (thereforca,~the'tpPop sedilwaiverenis
unnrccssary.
3, That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
condlttons appiicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property
PC79-14g
[hat do not apply generally to ths property or class of use in the same viclnity and
zonc.
4. That the requested variance is not necessary for the preservatTon and
enJoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property Tn the sarne
vici~lty ~nd zone, and denicd to thc property In questTon.
5. That che requested variance NI11 be materialiy detrtmentat to the
public welfare or inJurlous Co the property or im~rovements in such viclnlty and zone
(n which [he property is loca[ed.
G. That one person indicated her presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subJect
petition.
E~~VIRO~J!1EriTAL tMPAtT FIHDIIIG: Tha[ the AnahcTn Ci:y PlanninG CamissTon has
reviewed endum t~o. 2 to Env ronmcntal Inpact Report t~o. 203 for Tentative Hap of
Tract No. 8115 (Revision ~lo. ~) and Tentative Map of Tract No. 9117 (Revision No. 4)
and has considered this date the evidence, both +vritien and oral, having been
presented to supplement Addendum No. 2 to Environmentai Inpac[ Report Ho. 203, f~nds
that po[ential environmental Impacts of [he proJect may be reduced [o an
insignificant level by coRformancc with City plans. policies and ordinances; and
Addendum No. 2 to Env(ronmental lmpac[ Report t~o. 203 ts in cer!plfance Ntth [he
Caltfornia Environmental Quality Act and wlth City and State EIR Gutdeltnes and the
Anaheim City Planni~g Lormission dces, therefore, based upon the above infomation.
certtfy Addendum No. 2 to EnvJronr+ental Impact No. 203.
N011. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ci[y Planning GommTssion
does hereby deny subjec[ Petition for Vartance on thc basis of the aforcmentioned
flndings.
1479,
THE FOREGOIt:G RESOLUT~Ot7 is signed and approved by me this 30th d~y of July,
C~~-- /A .B aa..--...~/
CHAIRMAN, AlU1HEIH CITY PLANNING COHMISSION
ATTEST:
~~ ~~ ~
SECRETARY~ ANAFiEIH CITY PLANNING COM`115510N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORF;NGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Edtth L. Harris, Secretary of che Anahetm City Planning Cammisston. do
hereby certlfy that the foregoing resolutlon was passed and adopted at a meetTng of
thc Anahcim City Planning Comnlsslon hcld on July 30, lg7g~ by the followl~y vote of
the members thercof:
-2- PC79-149
AYES: COMMI5510lIERS: BARNES, BUSHORE. HER85T. 70LAR
NOES: COHMISSIONERS: DAVID, KING
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FRY
ifJ uITNESS 41HEREOF, 1 have hareunto set my hand this 30th day of July~ 1979.
~ECRE~AR~EIH CITY PLANNI'+G COMHlSSION
-3- PC79-1~9