PC 79-155RESOLUTION N0. PC79-155
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COHMISSION
THAT PcTIT10N FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 79-80-6 BE GRANTED.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning tommission did receive a verified
petitto~ for Reclassification from RALPH J. WpRDEN AND DOP,OTHY M. UARDEN~ P. 0. Bor.
4507, Anaheim, Caiffornia 92803. ow~ers, and MC LEAN AND SCHULT2. 2000 East Chapman
Avenue, Fulierton~ California 92631, agent, of certain real property situatcd in the
C1ty of Anaheim, County of Orange, Statc of Callfornta~ described as follows:
That portIon of Lot 33 of Ar,aheim Extension, in the City of
Anahelm, County of Ora~ge. State of GalifornTa, as shown on a Map
of Survey made by Wilitam Hamel and filed in the offtce of the
county recorder of satd Los Angeles County, Caltfornia, a copy of
whTch is shown In book 3. Page 163 et seq.. entitled "Los Angeles
Lounty Map". records of said Orange County, descrlbed as follows:
Begin~ing at [he intersection of the Easterly line of that certaTn
5.25 foo[ strip of land, described in [he deed to the Ci[y of
Anahetm, recorded in book 174, page 35 of Deeds. records of saTd
Orange County. with the Nor[herly line of the o0 foot strip of
tand descrlbed in the Deed to Southern Pacific Railroad Company~
recorded in book 42~ page 225, of Deeds, records of said Oran9e
Coun[y; thence North 00~ 14' 25" uest 192.11 feet along safd
Easterly lTne; thence South 39° 54' OS" East 130.93 feet; thence
South 37° 27' 25" East 109.52 feet; thence Souih 35° 23' 24" East
77.17 fee[ to said Northe~ly line; thence from a cangent bearing
Nerch 77° 29' 43" West. Westerly 203.17 feet along a curve concave
Northerly and having a rad(us of 1402.47 feet through a central
angle ef B° 16' 01" to the potnt of beginning.
4/HEREAS~ the Clty Planning Commisston did hold a public hearing at the City
Hail i~ Che Clty of Anahelm on July 30, 1974. at 1:3~ o.m „ natice of satd oubllc
hearTng havTng been duly gTven as required by law and Tn accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Munictpal Code. Chapier 18.03. to hear and consider
evidence for and agatnst said propased reclassificatTon and to investigate and make
findings and recammenda[ions in connec[Ion [herewith; and
WHEREAS. saTd Cortmisston. after due tnspec[tan. investigation and study made
by Ttself and in its behalf, and after due constderation of ali evidence and repnrts
offered at satd hearing. dces ftnd and determine [he follor~i~g fac[s:
1. That Lhe petitioner proposes reclassTficatTon of subject property from
the CG (Commcrical. Generai) Zone co the ML (Industrial~ Limtted) 2ane.
2. That the Anahefm General Plan designaces subject property for general
cormercial land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassifTcation of subJect property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderiy and proper developme~t of the community.
PC79-155
RESOLUTION N0. PC79-155
A RESQLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CI7Y PLANNING COHMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 79-80-6 BE GRANTED.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from RALPH J. WARDEN AND DOROTHY H. WARDEN, P. 0. Box
4507, Anaheim~ California 92803, owners, and MC LEAN AND SCHULTZ~ 2000 East Lhapmen
Ave~ue, Fullerton, Caltfornia 92631. agent, of certain real property situated in the
City of Anahetm, County of Orange, State of Californta, described as foilows:
That portfon of Lot 33 of Anahefm Extension, in the City of
Anahelm, County of Orange, State of Californla, as shown on a Map
of Survey made 5y William Hamel and filed in the offlce of the
county recorder of said Los Angeles County, Galifornia, a copy of
which is shown tn boo4: 3, page 163 et seq., entitled "Los Angeles
County ~1ap", records of sald Orange County, described as follows:
Beglnning at the intersectton of the Easterly iine of that certaln
5.25 foot strip of land, described in tt~e deed to the Ctty of
Anaheim, recorded in book 174, page 35 of Deeds, records of said
Orange County, wlth the Northerly itne of the 60 foot sirtp of
land described in the Deed to Southern Pacific Railrot•d ~ompany,
recorded in book 42, page 225, of Deeds, records of sa(d Qran9e
County; thence North OQ° 14' 25" West 192.11 feet along safd
Easterly line; thence ;ou~h 39~ 54' OS" East 130.93 feet; thence
South 37° 27' ~5" East 109.52 feet; thence South 35° 23' 24" East
77.17 feet to said Northerly iine; thence fran a tangent beartng
North 77° 29' y3" Nest, Wesferly 203.17 feet along a curve concave
Northerly an~ having a radius of 1402.47 feet through a central
angle of 8° 18' 01" to the point of beginning.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hoid a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on July 30, 1s79, a2 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as requlred by law and in aceordance with the
provisions of the Anat~ein Municlpal Code, Chapter 19.03~ to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassiflcatlon and to investtgate and make
f(naings and reccMmendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, satd Commtssion~ after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evtdence and reports
offered at safd hearing, does find and determine the followtng facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subJect property from
the CG (Com•aericai, Generai) Zone to the ML (Industrial, L(mited) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for general
commercial land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassificatlon of ;ubJect property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper dev~lopment of the community.
PC79-155
_ ._.._.. _ ~
~~.
,~ ,
4. That the proposed reclassffication of subiect property does properiy
relate to the zones and thetr pernitted uses locally establtshed 1n close proxtmity
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the communtty.
5. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and thai no correspondence was received ln opposition to [he subject
pctition.
ENVIRONMEHTAL INPACT FIHDitlG: That the knahcim City Ptanning Commission has
revier+ed the proposal to reclassi y subject property from the CG (L'ommercial,
General) to the ML (Industrial, Limited) Zone o~ an irregularly shaped parcel of land
consisttn9 of approximately Q.~+ acre, having a frontage af approxlmately 192 feet on
the east side of Walnut Street, having a maximum depth of approximately 2n3 feet, and
be-ng located approximately 140 reet north of the centeriine of Nanchester Avenue;
and does hereby approvc the Nega[ive Declaration from the requirement to prepare an
environmental Impact report on the basis that there woutd be no significant
individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of [his
Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Pian designates the subjer_t property
for 9eneral cormercial land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitiva
environmental impacts are Involved in [he proposal; that thc Initial Study submitted
by the petitioner indicates no sign(ficant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impacts; and that thc Negative Declara[lon substantfatfng ihe foregoing
findinqs (5 on file in the Cfty of Anaheim Planning Department.
NON~ Tf~EREFORE, SE IT RESOLVED that thc Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby 9rant subjec[ Peticion far Reclassification and, by so doing, that Tltle
18-Zoning of the Anaheim Munfcipal Lode be amended to exclude the above-described
property from the CG (LOMMEP.CIP.L, GENEP.AL) ZONE and to incorporate said described
property ineo the ML (It~DUSTRIAL, LIHITED) ZO!!E upon the foilowing cendttlons which
are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subJect
proper[y in order to preserve the safe[y and gencral welfare of the Lttixens of the
City of Anahetm:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordinance No, 3396), in an amount as determined by the City Council,
for industrial buiidings prior to the issuancc uf a 6uilding permit.
E3E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the ~naheim Lity Pianning Commisston does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution Is expressly predicaLed upon
applican['s canpliance with each and all of the conditions hereir.above set forth.
Should any such condition, or .~ny part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court or competent jurtsdictton, then this Resolution,
and any approvals hsrein contained, shall be deemed null and void,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOt! is signed and approved by me this 30th day of July,
1979.
_l'~Q-~-~.--~ ~ ,c~~.~
LHAlRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNI~lG COMMISSIOM
ATTEST:
ECRETARY~ ANAfiElhl LITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2- PC7g-155
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
1~ Edtth L. Harris, Secretary of the Anahe.lm City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anahelm City Planning Commission held on July 30, 1979~ by the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BUSHORE, DAVID, hERBST~ K-NG, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FRY
IN WITNESS UHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 30th day of July, 1g79.
'~~ .~Y ~.~.~..
SECRETAP.Y, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOk
_3_ PC79-155