PC 79-157i
RESOLUTION N0. PC79-157
A RESOLUTION OF TIIE A!JAHEIM CITY PLANPIING COMMISSION
THAT PETITIO~~ FQR COtIQITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 20n3 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did recefve a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from WALTER J. BURANDT AND MARY E. BURANDT, 1331
Plorth East Street, Unit B, Anaheim, Caltfornia, 92805, ovrners, and CALVIN O150~, 1331
North East Street, Unit L, Anaheim, Callfornla 92805, agen[, of cer[ain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Calffornia, described as:
PARCEL 1: THAT PORTIQN OF LOT 3 OF THE STOCY.WELL SUBDIVISION, 14
TH[ CITY OF At~AHEIM, COUtJTY OF ORA~lGE~ STATE OF CALIfORNIA, AS PER
MAP RECORDED i~ BOOK 6 PAGE 10 OF t115CELLAPIE0U5 MAPS, IN THE
OFF~CE OF THE COUNTY RECORDEP, OF SAID COUPITY, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOl15: BEG 1 t!N I HG AT THE I HTERSECT 104 0~ TIIE EASTERLY
PROLOtlGATIO'~ OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3, WITN THE CENTER t.INE
OF EAST STREET (FORMERLY Y.P~OWf! AS RAYMOND AVE~lUE) ; TIiEtICE ALONG
SAID CENTER LINE OF EA57 STP.EET NORTH 0° 14' 14" WEST 17ti.OQ;
THENLE PAf~ALLEL TO SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89~ 37' 46" 41E5T 45.00
FEET TO TNE TRUE PO I NT OF BEG I t.N I tiG; THENLE COr~71 ~!U I tIG ALONG LAST
SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 89~ 37' 46" WEST 10~J.0~ FEET: THENCE
PARALLEL WITN SAID CE4TER LINE SOUTti 0° 14' 40" EAST 1~+2.00 FEET;
THEPICE PARALLEL NITH SAID CENTEP, LIFIE SOUTN 8?~ 37~ 4(" EAST 84.98
FEET TO THE BEGIkFlIE1G OF A TAPlGENT CURVE CONCAVE `~ORTHWESTERLY
fiAVIFIG A RADIUS OF 15.00 FEE7 AND A CEt:TR/!.L AtJGLE OF 90~ 07' 34";
THENCE ALONG TNE ARC OF SAID CURVE NOP.THEASTERIY 23.59 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0° 14' 40" WEST 126.98 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINtJiNG.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a publtc hearing at the City
Hall in the Ctty of Anahcim on July 30, 1g7~, at 1:30 p,m., nottcc of said public
h~artng having been duly given as required by law and in accordance wtth ehe
provisions of [he Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.D3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permtt and to investigate and
make findings and recorrorendatlons In conrection therewith; and
IJHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by 1LSelf and In its behalf~ and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following fac[s:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditionai use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Lode Sections 18.03.030.010 and
18.61.050.070 to wit: to permit automobile glass installation and retail giass sales
in the ML (I~dustrial, lfmited) Zone.
2. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adJoining land uses
and the gra~th and development of the area in whtch it is proposed to be located.
3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use ts adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimentat to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety. and general welfare of the Citlzens
of thc Ci:y of Anaheim.
PC79-157
~. /
4, That the granttng of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditTons
imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the CTty of Anaheim.
5, That the traffic generated by the proposed use wtll not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and Tmproved to carry the traffic in
the area.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposttion; and that no correspondence aras received in opposition to the subject
petition.
Ef~VIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Aneheim City Planning Cammissiun has
reviewed the proposal to permi[ automobile glass installation and retail glass sales
I~ the ML (Industriai, Limited) Zone on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land
consisting of approximately 0.3 acre located at the northwest corner of Kenwood
Avenue and East Street, having approxlmate frontages of 100 feet on the north side of
Kenwood Avenue and 142 feet on [he v+est side of East Street; and does hereby approve
the Neyative Declaratfon from the requirement to prepare an environme~tal impact
report on the basis that there would be no sign3fi~ant individual or cumulative
adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since
the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for general industrtal land
uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensttive environmental impacts are
involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner
indicates no sianificant individual or cumulative adverse environmentai impacts; and
that the Negative Declaration substan[iating the foregoing findings is on file in the
City of Anahefm Planning Department.
NO~, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ctty Planning Canmisslon
does hereby grant subJect Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject property 1n order to preserve the safety and general weifare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That su6Ject prooerty shall be develope~i substantially in accordance
with plans and speciflcations on 1`ile with the City of Anahein marked Exhibit Nos. 1
and 2.
2. That the proposed automobile installa[ton and retafl glass sales
facility shall c«nply with all stgning requirements of tlie ML Z~ne.
3. That all work and storage activities shall be conducted entlrely wTthln
the building.
4. That tra~h storage areas shalt be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Director of Public Works.
5. That Condttion Nos. t and 4, above-menCioned, shall be comptied wlth
prior to final buildin9 and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolutton is expressly predicated upo~
applicant's compliance wlth each and all of the condttions hereinahove set forth.
-2- PC79-t57
Should any ~uch condition, or any part thereof~ be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final Judgment of any court of competent Jurisdlction~ then thts ReSOluLlon.
and any approvals herein contatned, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREG0ING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 30th day of July.
1979•
~ s~~ e,,.--a~
CHA RMAN, ANAHEIM CI Y PLANHI!IG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ 1~ ~ ~~
SECREfAR . ANAHEIM LITY LAHNING COhLNISSIOl~
STATE OF LALIFORNIA }
COUtJTY OF ORANCE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Ar,aheim City Plannin9 Commisston~ do
hereby certify [hat the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commisston held on July 30, 1979, by the foliowing vote of
the members thereof:
pYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ BUSHORE. DAl'ID, HERBST. KING
NOES: COMNISSIOt~ERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIOt~ERS: FRY~ TOLAR
IN WITNE55 WHEREOF~ I have hereunto set my hand thls 30th day of July, 1979.
~`G,~.aL x' ;~l~,t,~
SECRETARY, ANAHE115 CITY PLANNItiG CONMISSION
-3- PC79-157