PC 79-177~~ ~~
RESOLUTION N0. PC79-177
A RESOLUTIOG OF THE ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR COilDITIO~~AL USE PERMIT N0. 2018 BE GRA~ITED
WHEREAS~ the Anaheim City Planning Commission dfd receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Pcrnit from DORIS HOBBS~ 12400 Euclid Street, Garden
Grove. Caltfornia, 92640, owner, and VISTA DEVELOPMEtlT LORPORA710N, 4001 Birch
Street~ 17ewport Beach, CA ?2650, a9ent, of certatn reat property situated in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange~ State of Ca~ifornia, described as:
PARCEL 1: Be9lnntng a[ the most Northeast corner of Section 3 in
Township 4 South, Range 10 West in the Rancho San Juan CaJon de
Santa Ana, as shown on a Map recorded in book 51. Page 7 of
Miscelianeous Maps, records of Orange County California, running
[hence West along the North line of said Section 346.5 feet;
thence at right angies South 660 feet; thence at right angles East
346.5 feet to a point on the East line of said Sec[ton; thence
North along satd East linc. 660 feet to the poin[ of beginning.
Excepting therefrom the North 185 feet of [he Eas[ 175 feet
thereof.
PARCEL 2: Beginning a[ a point in the North line of said
Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter distant thereon 346.5
feet Wes[ fran the Northeast corner of said Section, a~d running
thence at right angles South 660 feet; thence at right angles 11est
132 feet; thence at ri9ht angles ~~orth G60 feet; thence East 132
fcet to the point of begfnning. Excepting therefrom the IJesteriy
76 feet. Also excepting :herefrom the Southerly 33~ fect o` the
Easterly 20 feet of the Nesterly 96 feet.
11HEP.EAS, the Gity Plannina Cortimission did hold a public hearino at the City
Hall in the Ctty of Anaheim on August 13. 1979. at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisTons of the Anaheim Municipal Gode, Lhapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against satd proposed conc~itional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendattons in co~nectTon therewith; and
IJHEREAS, said Commission, after due InspectTon~ investigation and study made
by Itself and tn its behalf, and after due consideratlon of all evidence and reports
offcrcd at satd hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properiy one for which a condttional use
permit Is authortzed by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 1E.03.030.010 and
1II.61.050.k00 to wit: To construct a comiercial offtce complex in the ML
(Industrial, Limtted) Zone.
2. That the proposed use is hereby granted subJect to the pecitioner's
sttpulatior at the public hearing that there wlll be no medical uses nor retafl
scores a~a that each use proposed to be established on subJec[ property shall be
submTtted in wrttten form to the PlannTng Department for review and approval prior to
PC2g-177
issuance of a business license in order that a determinatlnn may be made as to
whether the proposed use would be appropriate for the site and whether sufficient
parking is provtded on [he property to accommodate the additlonal parking demand
whTcfi may be created by such a use. In order to provide guidelines for Staff
d~termtnation~ the 4ollowing types of uses may be permit[ed subJect to the written
request and review procedures outlined above:
a, Hortgage and finance companies
b. Investment security companies
c, Insurance companles-branch or home offlces
d. Insurance a9encies and brokera9e ftrms
e. Real estace fTrms-investment. cortmerclal and industrial oniy
f. Title and escrow companies
g. Attorneys
h. CPAs
i. Advertising
j, Engineering firms-consulting
k. Architects
1. Marketing research
m. Interior decoration
n. Management consultants
o. Travel agencles
p, Training schools, related to sales, promotlon, management
skills, advancement, etc.
q, Electronic and computcr company
3. That the proposed usc, as granted, wfil not adversely affect the
adjofning land uses and the growth and development of the arca in which it 15
proposed to be located.
4. That the size and shapc of the site proposed for the use, as granted,
is adequate to alia~+ thc full development of che proposed use tn a manner not
detrlmental to the parttcular area nor to the peace, health, safety. and general
we(fare of the Citizens of [he City of Anaheim.
5. That the Conditional Use Permit, as gran[ed, and under the condttlons
imposed~ will not be detrimental to the peace. health~ safety and general welfare of
the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the t~affic generated by the proposed use wtll not impose a~ undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed ~nd tmproved to carry the trafflc in
the area,
7, That no one indicated their presence at saTd pubilc hearing in
opposttion; and that no correspondence was recetved in oppositlon to the subject
petitton.
ENVIRONHENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning CommTssTon has
revtewed the proposal to construct a cortmercial office complex fn the ML (Industrlal.
Limited) Zone on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisttng of approxir.wtely 4.8
acres located at the southwest corner of Orangethorpe Avenue and Raymond Avenue,
having a frontage of approximately 358 feet on the south side of Orangethorpe Avenue
and a frantage of 607 feet on the west side of Raymond Avenue; and dces hereby
-2- PC79-177
approve the Negative Declaratlon from thc requlrcment to prepare an envlronmental
impact report on the basis that there vrould be no sl9nificant indivlduat or
cumulatTve adverse envTronmental lmpact due to the approval of this Nega[ive
Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subJect property for
general industrtal land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive
environmental Impacts are involved in thc proposal; that thc Inlttal Study submitted
by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmenta) impacts; and that the ~Jegativs Declaration subs[antiating the foregoing
ftndings is on file In the Ctty of Anaheim Planning Oepartmen[.
NOU, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that [he Anaheim City Plannin9 Commisslon
does hereby grant subJect Petitlon for Conditional Use Permit, upon the follow(ng
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the owner(s) of subJect propcrty shali deed to the Lity of AnahcTm
a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centcriine of the street along
Orangethorpe Avenue, and 45 fee[ in widih from the centertinc of Raymond Avenue, for
street Hidening purposes. including a 25-foot radtus property line return.
2. That sidewalks shall be installed along Raymond Avcnue and Orangethorpe
Avenue as required by the City Engineer and in accordance KlLh standard plans and
specifica[lons on file tn the Office of the City Engineer.
3. That the rn+ner(s) of subJect property shall pay to thc City of Anaheim
a fee. in an amount as determined by thc City Council. for street llghting along
Raymond Avenue and Orangethorpe Avenue.
4, That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
a fee~ in an amount as determined by ihe City Council~ for tree planting purposes
atong Orangethorpe Avenue and Reymond Avenue.
5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file Hith the Office of the ExecuiTve Dirvector of Pubilc Works.
6. That fire hydran[s shall be installed and charged as requlred and
determined to be necassa~y by the Chlef of the Ftre Departmen[ prtor [o coim~encemenc
of structural framing.
7. 7hat subJect property shall be served by undergrourd utTlTties.
8. That dralnage of subject property shall be disposed of )n a manner
satisfactory to the Licy Englnecr.
9. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ord(nance tlo. 3$96) in an amount as determined by the Clty Council~
for each new dwelltng unit prior to the issuance of a building permit.
10. That approprTate water assessment fees as determined by the Offtce of
Utilttics General Hanager shall be pald to the City of Anahelm prior to the (ssuance
of a bullding permit.
-3- Pt79-t77
ii. That the proposed officc conplex shali comply aTth all signing
requtrements of the NL zoning.
12. That the owncr(s) of subJect property shal) submit a l~tter requcsting
Lhe termination of Condtitonal Use Permit No. 788 to the Planning Commisslon.
13. That subJect property shall be developed substan[ially 1~ accordance
with plans and speclfications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhiblt Nos. 1
and 2.
14. That Condition ~Jos, i, 2~ 3. 4 and 12~ above-mentioned. shall be
complied with prior to the cam+encement of the activity authorized under this
resolut(on, or prlor to the time thai [he building pcrmit ts issued, or wlthin a
period of one year from date hereof~ -~ichever occurs first. or such further time as
the Planning Commisslon may grant.
15. 7hat Condltion Nos. S. 7. 8. and 13. ~bovc-mentioned, shall be comptied
With prior to final building and zoning inspections.
16. That prior to issuance of bustness licenses, each use proposed to be
esta611shed shall be submicted in written forn to the Planning Department for rcview
in order that a de[crminatlon may be made as to Hhcther the proposed use would be
approprTatc for thc site and r~hether sufficicnt parking is provided on the property
to accamodate the additional parking demand which may be crcated by such a use. In
order to provldc guidctines for 5taff determina:ton~ thc fotlowing types of uses may
be permitted subject to thc tiri[tcn reQuest and revicx procedures outlined abovc:
a, Mortgage and fTnance companies
b. Investment security companies
c. Insurance companies-branch or home offices
d. Insurance agencies and brokerage ftrns
e. Reat estate firms-Investment, commercial and industrial only
f. TI[tc and escrow companics
g. Attorncys
h. CFRs
i. Adverttsi~g
J. Engineering flrns-cansulting
k. Architects
1. Harketing research
m, InYcrior decoration
n. Management consultants
o. Travel agencies
p. Tralning schools. related to sales. promotlon~ managu~ent
skit)s, advance~ent, etc.
q. Elcc[ronic and compuicr campanles
BE IT PURTHER RESOLVEO tha[ the AnaheTm City Pla~ning Cnm ission does hereby
find and determine that the adoption of this Resolution is expressly p~edicated upon
aapl(cant's compliance wtth each and all of the conditlons hereinabove set forth.
Should any conditTon or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by che
final Judgment of any court of competent JurisdTctTon, then this Resalutlon~ a~d any
approvals herein contalned. shall be deemcd null and void.
-4- PC79-177
~~ ~~ .
G:; ~
:~;; ~
'~~ 1 1 l l
n _
;~
? THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOIJ is slgned and approved by me this 27th day of
August, 1979•
~_
C A ~
ANAHEIM CITY PLA~INING COHMISSIOtI
ATTEST:
~ aS. l~il~~fit.ri~.
SECRE~AR , ANAHEIM CIfY LANNIlJG CON1115SION
STAT'E OF CALIFORNik
COUI~TY OF ORkNGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANANEIM )
t, Edith L. Harris. Secretary of Lhe Anaheim City Planning Cortmission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing res~iution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Lommia•si~n held on August 27, 1979, at 1:30 p.m.,by the
following vote of the members th~reor':
AY!:S: COMN155fONERS: DAVID. FRY, HERBST~ Y.ING
NOES: COMMISS(ONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COHMISSIOtdERS: ElARNES, BUSHORE, TOLAR
IN WITNESS WHEP.EOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of August, 1979•
~~1.~1! w.~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY LAlttIING COt1MIS510N
~, -5- Pc79-177