PC 79-90RESOLUTION N0. PC79-90
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANI~ING COHMISSIOM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIO~lAL USE PERMIT N0. 1971 RE GRANTED
NHEREAS, the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commission did receive a verifted
Petition for ConditTonal Use Permit from SHINICHI ITO AND Ll11YEK0 ITO, 1201 East
Kateila, Anaheim, California, 92806, owncrs, and ABLO CONSTRULTION LOMPANY, 2535
Maricopa Street, Torrance, Californta 90503, agent, of certain real property sltuated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Laltforn(a, described as:
PARCEL 1: The Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of the
Southeast quarter of Section 23, Townshio 4 South, Range 10 IJest,
San Bernardino Base and Meridian. Except the hest 1 acre thereof.
Also except the west 240 feet of that portion [hereof lying East
of the East iine of said Wesi i acre thereof. Also except an
undivlded 14.6/20ths tnterest in the North 10 feet of the East 60
feet of the Uest 336 fect of the Southeast quarter of the
Southwest quar[er of the Southeast quarter of said Section 23.
WHEREAS, the Ctty Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Lity
Hali in [he L(ty of Anahelm on May 7, 1979, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearina having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anah~im Municipal Lode. Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditionai use and to investi9ate and make
findings and recortmendations in connec[ion therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Carvnission, after due inspec[ion, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said heartng, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is au[he~i~:d by Anahelm Municipal Code Sections 18.61.050.220 and
13.61.05~.3°~ to pe~^~it a r~otcl and restavrant in the '!L {Industrlal, linited) Zone.
2. That the proposed use riill not adversely affect the adJoining land uses
and the growth and developmen[ of the area in whtch it is proposed to be located.
3, That the size and shape of [he site proposed for thr_ use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrim~ntal to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citlzens
of the City of Anaheim.
4. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, w(11 not be detrimen[al [o the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the i.ity of Anaheim.
5. That no one indicated their presence at satd public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subJect
petitlon.
ENVIRONMENTAL It1PACT FIIlOING: Thai the Anahefm City Planning Commissfon has
reviewed the proposal to permit a motel and restaurant in the ML (Industrial~
PC79-9o
Limited) Zone on a rectangularly-shaped parce) of land consistTng of approximately
4.8 acres, having a frontage of approximately 35~ feet on the north side of Katella
Avenue~ having a maximum depth of approximately 595 feet, being located approximately
1315 feet west of the centerli~e of State College Boulevard; and does hereby approve
the Negative Declaratton from the requirement to prepare an envlronmental impact
report on the basis that there would be no significant individual or cumulative
adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since
the Anaheim General Plan designates the subJect property for general industrial land
uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are
involved in the proposal; that the In(tial Study submitted by the petitloner
indicates no stgnfficant ind(vidual or cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and
that the Negative Declaration suhstantlating the foregoing findings is on file in the
City of Anahefm Planning Department.
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that che 0.nahelm City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of [he subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That sidewalks shall be installed along Katella Avenue as requlred by
the City Engtneer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in
the Office of the City Engineer.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Director of Public Works.
3. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Pire Departmen[ prior to commencemeni
of structural framing.
4. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
a fee, in an amount as determfned by the City Counctl, for strect lighting along
Katella Avenue.
5. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay the traffic signal
assessmen[ fee (OrJinance Ho, 3396) in an amount as de[ermined by Che City Louncii~
for each new motei unit prior to the issuance of a buildi~g permit.
6. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordinance No. 3896) in an amount as determined by the Ctty Counctl~
for canmercial buildings for chat portion of che project developed as a restaurant
prior to the issuance of a building permi[.
7. That the proposed motel and rescaurant shall comply with all signing
requirements of the ML zoning.
8. That subject property shall be devetoped substanttally in accordance
with plans and specificatio~s on file with the City of Anaheim ma~ked Exhibit Nos. t
through 3: Rrovfded, however~ that kicchen efflciency units with a maximum of 6-cubtc
foot refrtgerators; two-burner stoves. raccluding oven and baktng facllitfes; and
stngle compartment stnks may be installed; except that the manager's untt will be
allowed to have full kitchen fac(lities.
-2- PC79-90
9, That Conditiort Wo. 4~ above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior to
the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to the
time that the building permit is issued, or within a period of one year from date
hereof~ whichever occurs first. or such further ttme as the Planning Commission may
grant.
10. That Conditto~ Nos. 1, 2 and 8. above-mentioned, shall be complied wTth
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FIRTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Canmission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of thts Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each ~nd all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition~ or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurtsdiction, then this Resolutlon,
and any approvals herein contained. shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUT104 ts sfgned and approved by me this 7th day of May,
1979.
N, A AH IM CiTY LANN~NG COMMISS~ON
ATTEST:
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
LOUNTY OF ORANGE } ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Pianning Comnission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolutton was passed and adopted at a meetfng ~f
the Anahetm City Plannin9 Cortmission held on May 7, 1?79. by the followtng vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONEkS: BARNES, BUSHORE, QAVID, HERBST~ JOHNS0~1, KING, TOLAR
NOES: LOMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COM!115510NER5: NONE
IN NITqESS WFIEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 7th day of Hay, 1979.
l~ ~ ~ /~s~
3ECRETARY, ANAHE111 CIYY PLANNING CONMISSION
-3- PC79-40