Loading...
PC 80-104RESOLUTI011 il0. PC~30-1~4 A R[SOLUTIQt; QF TNE AtJAF+EI!1 CITY PLAtI!litlG CD~1~115510M THl1T PETITIO~d FQR COtdDIT1~?t;AL !ISE PER~~IT PIO. 2~"? [3E GP,A~IT~D 1dIlEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit from STRTE MUTUAL I'dVEST~RS IPIf,., 97~1 ~dewport eeach, California, 92~+50, ormer, and DOP! GA!'PBELL, 705 Berkeley Circle, Fullerton, California ~2305, agent, of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as: PARC[L 2: PARCELS 1 TNRU 13 AtID PARCELS 21 THRU 3~, li! TIfE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUiITY OF ORAMGE, STi1TE OF CALIFORP!IFl AS PEP HAP FILED IN BOOK 13>, PAGES 19 THRU 22 OF PARCEL kAPS, Iti TIIF. OFFICF OF THE COUtJTY RECORDER OF SAID COU~lTY. 41HEREAS, the City Planning Commissior, did hold a public hearinn at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim an June 3~, 1~3(1, at 1:30 p.m „ notice of caid public hearing having been d~ly given as required by laa~ and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1Z.!?3, to hear and consider evidence for and against said propased conditional use permit ancl to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection there~~~ith; an~i LlHEP,E61S, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after clue consideration of all evi~ience and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the follo~•!ing facts: 1. That the proposed use is pronerly one for t~hich ~ conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim ~lunicipal Code Section 1".(1.~~O.lf3!1 to wit: tc pcrmit a~ exterminating servicP i~ the Ml (Industrial, Limited) Zone. 2. That the proposed use i~~ill not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located. 3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allo~•i the full developnent of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to t!~e peace, health, safety, and general ~•~elfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim, lE. That the grantin~ of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed, if any, ~~ill not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general ~yelfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheir~. 5~ That t'rie traffic genet~~ted by the proposed use ~•~i 11 not impose an undue burden upon the streets and high~•~ays designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. 6. That no one indtcated their presence at said public he~ring in opposition; and that no corres~ondence ~:as received in opposition to the subje~t petition. PC9~-10-'E ~,~. . I'~ • revie~•~e~ EflV-R`pN~~~L~L 111Pq~T F r t~1e pr~posal t~ ItlJIFI;: That the ,!Ina! lim-te~) Zone Permit an extermina 1ejm CjtY Plannin 0'S acre havi~~ on a rectangularly-sha ed t'n0 servfce ~~ 9 Commi,sion has Drive 1 a frontage of a ~ Paracel of land t'he ~iL (Indusrlal, and a fronta e PP~or.imately 178 on the~southtn9 of a Y bet~9 located a ~°f `~pProximately 1;0 Feet ofee~ PProximatel ~OeS here6y ~pPrOixmately ~ppp f n the toestsPd~ sid~ of IJoodland PProve ~ eez east of the cen of Woo~lend envtronmenta~ ~m t1e ~Je9at.ive Declaration terl(~~ of ~~a9~o~ta Drlve, and individua~ Pact report on t;ie ba from the r ~Ven~~; and PJegati~e p°~ ~unulutive adverse sis that Chere ~yo~~~rrement eclaration since t;7e environmen he tO PrePare an for general Anahefm General pa~ `m~'act due ~O Si9~~ficant environmenta~ ~ndustrial land 1an d tO the aopr~~a~ of impacts are ~ses commensurate ~y(thet'1enates the subject this by t~~~ Petitioner ~nvolved in the P~oposal• P~oPerty environmental ~m tndicates P~~Posal; that the Initialtst~~{~o sensitive findings ;S Pacts; and that n~ 5~9niTicant indivfdual or Y submftted on f(le in the Cit t~e ~~e9~tfve Ceclaration ~~~~~atPve Y of Anafieim P)a substantiati~ adverse ~104/ ~~j~~ Department. 9 the foregoing does hereb ' THEP,EFORE, BE IT conditionsY 9~ant subject Petition po~~CoE~ that the Flnaheim Cit P ~•~htc(~ are hereby found ~d~ti°nai Ilse p Y lannlna Commission of the subject propert tio he ~ ermit ~itizens of Y in order to necessa ry Prereauisi up~~ the following t5e City of Anaheim; Preserv~ th~, safet t~ t~ the oro Y and general ~~elf~rep~Se~ use ~• That sub ~ ~f the ~~jt~ plans and sPeclfic~tjonsPrO~ertY shall be develope~{ suhstanttall and 2. on fi le ~~tth the Clty of Anaheim marked Y jn accordance BE IT FU(;Tf1ER RESO r Exh i b( t Plos. 1 fjnd and deter~lne LV~D that tfie Anaheim ~~t P aPPlicant~s that adoptro~ of this Resolu Y~~nning Commisslon does Snould a~ ~ompliance ~vith each and all of ti°~ Y such condition js Pxpress~y predicar~dhereby bY the fina) ~~r any part the conditlons hereinabovF UPon Y apprn~~a I s com orYh. and a~ .lud9erein~f anY c~i~rt o~therPetente declar~.~ i7VaJi~1 or unenfor eable contained, shall ~~ .iurisdictlon, then TfiE FOREGOIFIG , deem~~ nu11 and ~o~~,, this P,esolutfon, 1 g£3p, RESOLJTI Opi i s s i gned and aPProved by ne thts 3nth rlaY of June, Arresr: cHai~t~!o~ , ~. !1~lAFiEI-1 CITY PLA~~ C~!1MISSION SECRETARY, AFJAHEIPI CI~PLAP:PJING COMH ~ I~S IOPI -z- Pr.B~-~o4 ~..~ STATF OF CAL I FOP,P! i A ) COUNTY OF OP,AMGE ) ss. C ITY OF A~IAIiE IIt ) ~, Edith L. Flarris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Plannino Commission, do hereby certifY that the foregoing resolu~ion aras passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Conmission held on June 30, 1920, by the follo~~ing vote of the members thcreof: AYES: COM111SSIOtJERS: BARP~ES, BUSFIOP.E, FRY, NEP,P.ST, KI"1~, Tn~_AP, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOtIE ABSEtlT: COMMISSIOtJERS: tJ~NE VACANCY: OtIE SEF1T ~tJ WIT~lESS 41fiEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3~th day of June, 1°R0. `~ ~, ~ z~ ~a~,~: , SECRETARY, AtJFlHEI!i CITY PL~NNIPi•; CO'1MISSIOM -3- PCS~-1o4