PC 80-127~;r:so~urion r~o. ~c 3~-i27
A R~S(1LIIT10~1 OF TF!E /1'IAIiE I'1 C I TY PLIaPRJ I Pi~ CO!1't I SS I OPI
TFIItT PFTITI011 Ff1R VARI/VICF. "In, ?1!2 t3E f~~A.?;TF~, It! PA°T
k~HEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petitio~ for Variance fror~ t•11LDRED M,4Rr,n~_~r~ Ap!D 4lILLI~M ~1P,°,~;~LIN, ET AL, 270~ lJest
6a11 Road ;`lE, /lnaheim, Callfornia, oamers of certain re~l property situated in the
City of Flnaheim, County of Orange, State of California, descrih~d as:
The ~dorthti;~est quarter of the Northeast vuarter of the P~ortheast
quarter of Section 2~i, ToUmship ~~ South, Ran9e 11 lJest, S.Et.R,&
P1., exceptina therefrom the East 3^E, feet thereof.
IJHEREf1S, the City Planning Commissi~n did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on Flugust 11, 1~°~, at 1:3~ o.m,, notice of said public
hearing liavinq been ciuly given as required by lati•~ anci in accordancP with the
provisions of the Anahetm !~iunicipal Code, Chapter 18,!??, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and t~ invAstigate and malce
find;ngs and recommendattons in connection ttiereorith; and
1•lHEREAS, said Commission, aftcr due inspection, investlgation and study made
by itsel` and in its hehalf, and after due consideratior, of all evidence an~l reports
offerNd at said hearina, does find and dc~termine the foltot~iinn fac*.s:
1, That the petitioner ~roposes a i•~aiver of the follo~•~inn tn retain to~o
free-standing signs:
SECTIOM 1".3'E.O~],~3~ - Mar.im~im number and size of sians.
one 20-square fo~t siqn permitted;
two signs existing: 3~-snuare feet
and 15-square feet)
' That tf~c prcposed ~•iaiver is liereby grante<I, in nart, to permit one
free-standing sign: an existfng 3~-square foot monument-type sign (Sign "A"), and
denying thc second sign: a 15-square foot free-standing sian (Sign "B").
3. That the above-mentioned ~~aiver is hereoy granted, in part, on the
basis that the oeitioner demonstrated that a hardsliip exists in that denial would
deprive subject oroper*.~~ of a privilege being enjo;~d by other properties in the sane
zone and vicinity.
~! That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable.to the oroperty involved or to the intended use, as ~ranted, of the
property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same
vicinity and zone.
5. That the requested variance, as granted, is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other
~roperty in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
PC30-127
6. That the requested variance, as granted, i-rill not be materially
detrimental to the public t•~elfare or injurious to the property or fmprovements 3n
such vicinity and zone in ~•:hich the ~roperty is located,
7. That no ene indicated their ~resence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no corresoondence ~ras received in on~osition to the subject
petition.
EF!~11RONME~ITAL IMPACT FlPlnl~l~: The Planning Director or his authorized
representative has determined that the proposed project falis t~~ithin the definiticn
of Categorical E;c~nptions, Class 3, as deftned in Paragranh 2 of the City of Anaheim
Environmental Impact Report ~uidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from
the requirement to pre_pare an EIR.
PJOI~I, THEP,EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim C.ity Planntng Commisston
does hereby grant, in part, suhject Petition for Variance, uoon the following
conditions ~ihich are liereby found to he a necessary prereouisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general ~~elfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That suhject property shall be developed sut~stantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file ~~ith the City of Annheim marl-ed [xhibit tdos. 1
and 2.
FiE IT FURTfIER P~ESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission doPS herehy
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is ex~ressly predicated upcn
applicant~s compliance with each and all of the ~onditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment e` any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
a~d any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed nul) ard void.
THE FOREGOItI~ RFSOLUTION is signed and approved by me this ltth day of
August, 1980,
ATTEST•
,~'~~~ v ;~o~~-_
CNA I RhtAPJ, AtlAHE I M C ITY PLAMN I hIG COMM I SS I QN
SECRETaI',Y, AFJAiIE I"1 C~ Y PLAP1^~ 0~1~1I SS iTO,'!
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUhJTY OF ORAPlC,E ) ss.
CITY OF AMAHEIhi )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Comr~ission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 11, 1~~3n, by the following vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COM!11SSIOtJERS: BAR~lES, 130UAS, FRY, tlERDST
NOES: C~11~1155 IOt![RS: BUSNORE, KIII~, TOLIIR
A6SEPlT: COM141S510`ERS: tJOtIE
IW 1~11Tt![SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this llth day of August,
19t30.
~ ~ ~~~
SECRFTARY, AF!AHE IM C ITY PL ~In1 MG COtAtt SS QN
-2- PC8o-127