PC 80-128a~so~uTtori r~~, ~c ~3~-~23
A RESOLUTI ~~! OF THE APlAhIF I'1 C ITY PLA!I~d I!!~ CO'1~? ISS IOr.I
T~If,T PETITIOId F~R ~~ARIA'~CF fd0. ;1!~~ BE GRl1F!TEn
l•/HERE/1S, the Anaheim City Planninn Commissinn did receive a verified
~'etition for Variance from ~1l1,IC LAD!TERP!, INC., 1~3n 4/est i<atella /lvenue, A~aheim,
California 92^u~?, o!vner of certain real pro~erty situate~i in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange~ State of Cal(fornia, described as:
THE WEST 1~0 FEET OF TNE EAST 7.]!1 FEET OF TfIE W~RTH ;3~ FE~T OF
TIIE NQRTHI•IEST QU~If?TER OF TNE PIORTHIdEST nUp.RTER ~F TFIF DIORTH4JEST
QUA4T[P. QF SECTIOtJ 27, TOWt!SHIP 1; ;011?!I, RAFt,[ 1~ b/EST, IN THE
C ITY OF Ah!AFIEIM, COUIlTY OF OFA~IGE, STATE OF CAI.IFOR'IIA, AS PER PtAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 51 PF,GE t~ OF HI~CFLLA~IEOUS t1P,PS, I!I THE OFFIC'E
OF TNE COUFlTY RECnRpER OF SAID COII~ITY, EXCEPT ilfE tIORTH 3n FEET
TNERFOF.
l•IHEREAS, the City Pl~nnin~ Commission did hold a puhlic hearing at the Civic
Center in the C~ty of Anaheim on Flugust 11, i~3n, at 1:3~ p.m., notice of said puolic
hearing haviny been duly given as required hy la~~r and in accordanc< with tne
pr~visions of the Anaheim 1lunicipal Code, Chapter 1".~3, to hear and consider
=vidence for and against said proposed reclassification an~l tc investigate and make
Pindings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
LlHEZEAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petttioner nroposes ~vaivers of the follot~iing to expand an
er,isting motel:
(a) SECTIOPJ 18,04.0~~5,p12 - 'tinimum landscaped setback.
~~ eet required along a portion of Y,atella Avenue;
l~~eet ~roposeci)
(b) SECTIO~! 13,~6,~G0,~21,q - riinimum nun~+er of parking spaces.
7 spaces required;
52 spaces pro~oscd
2. Tliat the ahove-mentioned ~vaivers are herehy c~ranted on the basis that
the petitioner demonstrated that a hardship extsts in that denial i,iould deprive
subject property of ~rivileges gPin~7 enjoyed byother property o~,~ners in the same zon~
and vicintty.
3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circnmstances or conditions
applicable to the property invoived or to the i~tended use of the oroperty that do
not apply generally to the ~roperty or ciass of use in the samn vic(nity and zone.
4. Tf~at the requestrd variance is necPSSary fnr the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right ~ossessed by ot~~er nroperty in the same
vicinity and zone, and dented to the property in question.
PC~30-128
.~',, ;:
5. That the requested variance o~ill not be materially detrfinental to the
public welfare or injurious to the prope.rty or improvements in such victnity and zone
in whtch the property is located.
6. That no one indlcated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no corresoondence 4ras received in opposition to the subject
; petition.
EPJVIR1IHME~dTAL IMPACT FIMnIFI.r,; That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
reviea~ed the proposal to expand an existing motel ~~+ith a~aivers of minimum landscaped
setbacl< and minimum number of parking spaces or a rectannul~rlv-shaped setback and
minimum number of parking spaces on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting
of approximately ~,~3 acres, having a frontage of approximately 15n feet on the south
stde of Katella Avenue, having a maximum depth of approximatPly 27t1 feet and being
located approximately 38, feet east of the centerline of ~Jest Street; and does hereby
approve the Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental
impact report on the basis tf~at there alould be n~ significant individuat or
cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the aoproval of this Negative
Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for
commercial-rec:reation land uses commensurate ~oith the proposal; that no sensitive
environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study subMitted
by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impacts; and that the NPgative Declaration suhstanttating the foregoing
findings is on file in the City of Fnaheim Planning Department.
NOW, TNEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED tFat the Anaheim City Planninq Commission
does hereby grant subject Pe*_ition for Variance, upon the folloaiing conditions ~•~hich
are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject
property in order to preserve the safety and general e~ielfare of the Citizens of the
City of Anaheim:
1. That the o~vner(s) of suhject property shall pay to the Ci*y of Anaheim
a fee, in an amount as determined by the C+ty Council, for street lighttng along
Katella Avenue,
2. That trash storage areas shall be ~rovided in accordance ~~~ith approved
plans on file rrith the Office of the Executive Director of Puhlic Works.
3. That subject prooerty shall be served hy underground utilities.
4. That drainage of subject property shall he disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Enaineer,
5. That the oamer(s) of subject nroperty shall pay tlie traffic signai
assessment fee (Ordinance No. 3396) in an amount as determinecl by the City Counc?1,
for comnercial buildings prior to the issuance of a buil~ltn9 permit.
6. That suhject property shall be developed suhstanLially in accordance
wlth plans and specifications on file ~~~ith the City of Anaheim marl:ed Exhibit Plos. 1
through 7; provided, however, that I:itcheii efficiency units may be installed in no
more than 7_5~ of the units, ~•iith a maximum of 6-cuhic foot refriqerators; to-r~-burner
stoves, excluding over. and bal~ing facilities; and single c~mpartment sinks: exceot
that the nana,c,er's unit t•~ill he allowed to fiave full kitchen facilTties.
-7..- PC3~-128
7. That Condition No. 1, a6ove-mentioned, shall ~~e cnmplied ~.aith prior to
the commencement of the activity authorizecl i.inder this resolution, or prtor to the
time that the building ~ermit is issued, or ~Nithin a periori of one year from date
hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Planninn Commission may
grant.
$. That Condition Plos. 2, ;, !F and ~, ahove-mentioned, shall he complied
v~ith prior to final building and zonin~ inspections.
BE IT FURTNER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adopt(on of tFiis Resotution is ex,r.rFssly predicated upon
applicant's compltance ~~~iCh each and all of the conditions herelnabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, he declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void,
THE FOREG01~:; RESOL?ITION is signed and a~prove~l hy me this llth day of
August, 1980,
. CHAIR'111N, A~(~~'T' P~~
AnEST. ~-~N ~~ ~. C01.MiSSI~~J
~~~ ~ hL(~it n ~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAFINIPlG COMMISSI0~1
STATE OF CALIFORPIIA )
COUM7Y OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AWAHEIry )
I, Edith L. Harrls, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commissinn, do
hereby certify that the foregoin~ resolution ~~as passed and adoptecl at a meeting of
the Anaheim Cit~i Plar.ning Commiss?on held on August 11, 1~`3~, by the fol)owing vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: CONMISSIQr1ERS: BARNES, EiOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERDST, KING, TOLAR
NOES: COM!41SSIOMERS: WOME
ABSEPIT: CONt11SSi0PdtRS: PJONE
IPI 411TNESS 4!fiEREQF, I have hereunto set my hand this 11th day of August,
1980.
~~-~-~ .~ ~Z~~
atI,KET.ARY~ AriAiiEt!~ clrv PL~NI~llr~t; co~,~,tssiori
-3- PC80-123