PC 80-129r,FSO~ur~o~a r~o. PC3o-t29
A RESOLUTI Or1 OF TlIE A~lAIiE I~1 C ITY PLnhtr7l~lr, Cn~1P115S l0~!,
ADOPTIMS APlD RECQI•1t1~tJDI~dG TO THE CITY COU!ICIL OF THF CITY OF APJAHEIFt
DEN I/1L OF AtdAHE 111 GENERF,I PLAPI A"1Et1D1~ErlT IIp. 1 5~ - LF~tJ~ USF FLE~IEMT
IIHFREAS, The City Council of the City of Anaheim did adopt the Anaheim
General Plan hy Resolution Plo, '^R-622, sho!•~ing the general descriotion and extent of
possible future development and redevelopm~nt of land ~•~ithin the City; and
Wf{ERE~S, pursuant to requests from the property o4mer for General Plo~~
Study, the Anaheim City Planning Commission dir-ecred City staff to prepare a~~eneral
Plan Amendment for oroperty consisting of ap~roximately 1?.f~ acres located on the
south side of P,io Grande Drive appr~ximately 427 feet t~~est of the centerline of
Fairmont Boulevard; and
IJHEREAS, THE Planning ~epartment deemed it aopropriate, pursuant to the
prcvisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, to orepare Environmental
Impact Report tdo. 237, in connection i:~ith the General Plan Amendment for the
foregotng area under consideration; and
WHERFAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did hold a public Fearing at
the Anaheim Civic Center, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, A~aheim, on AugusY 11, 1980,
at 1:3~ P•m., notice of said public hearing having i?een dulv 9iVen as reauired by law
and in accordance arith the orovisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, t~ hear and
consider eviclence for and against said Amendment to th~ Ana'ieim ~eneral Plan and to
investigate and mal;e findings and recorxnendations in connection there~~rtth; and
l•1NER[AS, said Commission, after due inpsection, investigation ar.~± study made
by itself and in its behalf and after du~ consideration of all evi~:'ence and reports
offered at said hearing, DOES IIEREL'Y FIP!D:
1. That evidence ~resented indicated the ma_jority of the property had been
under a resolution of intent to RS-115-22,000(SC) zoning since 1~73; that the terrain
of the property ~~ould nat support the ~roposed increase in density; that ~tilities in
the hill and canyon area ~~~are not planned to accommodate the proposed increase in
density; and furthermore the evidence presented ~~ioes not suhstantiate the need for an
amendment to the Anaheim General Plan, and it is cieemed that "Exhihit A" be denied.
2. That approximately tv~enty (?_C) nersons indicated their presence in
opposition to subject request and petitions ~~~ere submitted containina approximately
231 signatures of persons in opposition.
tlObJ, TI1ER[("ORF, BE IT l;ESOLI'ED that after considering Environmental Impact
Report No. ?_37 for General Plan .4mendment ~lo. 153 for the oroposeci Rio Grande Vilias
residential development, and reviewing evidence, ~~oth ~~~ritten and oral, presented to
supplement draft EIR No. 237, tlie Plannin~ Commission finds that draft E.IR No. 1_37 is
in compliance ~~ith the California [nvironmental Quatity Act and a+ith City and State
EIR Guidelines and potential environmental im~+acts of the project may be reduce~l to
an insignificant lcvel hy conformance ~:iit`~ City olans, p~licies and ordinances;
?CS~-129
therefore, 6ased upon such information, the Planning Commission recommends to the
City Council that EIR PJo. ~37 he certified.
QE IT FUTfIER R[SOLVFD that, pursuant to the foregoing fin~linns, the Maheim
City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of
Anaheim denial of General P1an Amendment Plo, 153, as P0~~0415:
1. That "Exhibit A" he denied and r.o chan9es he Made to the current
General Plan Designation.
THE F~REGQI~lG RESOLUTION is signed and approved hy ne this 11th day of
August, 1~f30,
/a~;~"~ ~ ~'~~--
f,11AIRM t!, Artl~HE111 CITY PLF,NMIMR COF4~ISSIOM
A'~T E ST :
/., ~~ ~'~/ i5 ~uli/1iL~
SECf2ETARY, AhJAHEl1•1 CITY PLANPlIIJ~ CO^!"11S510~1
STATE OF CALIFORHIA )
COUNTY OF OR/1~IGE ) ss.
CITY OF A!JAHEIPI )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the f~regoing resolution ~•ras passed and ar~optPd at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on .Auaust 11, 1~~^~, by the following vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COt1MISS1(1rlERS: B.AR^IF~~ B~I~nc~ g1~c~i~nc~ Fr+v~ uc-nn<r~ i~~•~~~ TCL;~
~JOES: COHMISSION[RS: NQME
ABSEPIi: CQMHISSIONERS: NONE
Iha 4/1T~lESS lJtfEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this lith day of August,
1930.
/n ~t/,(.~lc. ~ ~`I~Qiu-c..i
SECRETARY, APJ4HEIM CITY PLA.r.~plN~ C~11~115SION
-2- PC30-129