PC 80-145RES01_UTIOP! PlO. PC~i~-145
A RESOLUTION OF THE AtJAHEIM ~~IT ~~~ B~~DENIF.1'MllITHOUT PREJIinICE
TNAT PETiTIOP! FOP, RECLASSIFIChT10~! N0.
4lHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commisston did initiate a verified
Anaheim, CountycofSOranqe,iStaterofPCalifornia, descrihed ast~~~~P~ in the City of
i.ots 5 thru 20 in tract Plo. 1~20 as shoarn on a mar recorded in
Book 51, pages 31 and 32 of Miscellaneous maps records of Orange
County Californta. Excepting therefrom any portion thereof lying
within Lincoln Avenue on the South and Grand Avenue of the East.
WHEREAS~ the City Pianning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on June 2, 1?80, at 1:3n p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by laa~ and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1R.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassi'rication and to investigate and make
findings and recortmendations in connection therev~ith; said public hearing having been
conttnued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 8, t~p0; and
~dHEREAS~ said Cormission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideratian of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following fscts:
1. Thaf the petitiorer proposes reclassification of subject property from
the RS-72~0 (Single-Family) Zone to the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone.
2, That the Anaheim General Plan designates suhJect oroperty for low-
density residentiaf iand uses ~rtth rear~y pro^°~t1es to the southeast being
designated for and developed with commercial land uses.
3, That the Planning Commisston determined there
if any of the subject lots viere to individuallY CO"*orfront
adverse aspects tncluding a single-lot owner having
alley and street improvements along other nearby lots;
preferable for land assembly to occur prior to any canmercial
would be adverse aspects
commercial uses, said
the expense for required
and that it would be
reclassification.
4. Based on the foregoing, the proposed reclassif?cation is denied,
without prejudice, at this tir.ie, with the tool for land assemblaoe heing pravided by
the approvai of Area Development Plan No. 11`~, Exhihit "C".
5, That the proposed reclassification of subf~~t ~Me~eorderlynoandeCproper
a~ desirable~ at this time without land assemblage,
development o,` the canmunity.
G. That at this time and without land assemblage, the proposed
reclassification of subject property does not properly relate to the zones and their
zonestand their permittedsusesigenerally,establishedtthroughoutethercommunityd to the
PCSo-1~~5
~, That approximately six (6) interested persons indicated their presence
at said public hearing; and that no correspondence v~as received i~ opposition to the
subject petition.
EfdVIRON~4EIJTAL IMPACT FitIDIN~: That the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon has
reviewed the proposal to stuGy vehicular access and reclassification from the RS-;'200
(Residential, Single-Family) Zone to the CL (Commercial, Limited) Z.one on a
rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consistina of approximately 3.f~ acres, having a
frontage of approximately 994 feet on the north side of Lincoln Avenue, having a
maximum depth of approximately 147 feet and being locateci approximately 30!1 feet east
of the centerline of 4lestern Avenue; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration
from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that
there would be no significant individual or cur~ulative adverse environmental impact
due to the apProval of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan
desianates the subject property for low-density residential land uses; with nearby
property to the southeast being designated for and developeci with commercial land
uses and with the General Plan providing flexihility tn instances where designated
land uses adjoin one another or front directly across from one another o~ arterial
highways; that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that
the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner tndicates no significant in~iivtdual or
cumulative adverse environmental imoacts; and that tne Neqative Declaration
substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the Citv of Anaheir~ Pianning
Department.
NOW~ TIIEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED that the AnaheTm City Planning Commission
does hereby deny subject Petition for Reclassification on the basis of the foregoing
findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIO~•I is siqned and approved by me this ~3th day of
September, 1980• , /
v /
CH M PI~ N NE h1 I ANN Nf. COMMISSION
ATTEST:
'~~ ~ .
SECPE , t~A~~ iM CI LANN Nr, COMMISSION
STATE OF CAL I FOR~i I A)
COUNTY OF ORAPIGE ) ss.
CITY Of ANAHEIM )
~~ Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anahetm City Planning Commtsston, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Pl,;nning Comnission held on September 8, 1Q~n, by the Foliowing vota
of the memhers thereof:
AYE5: COP1~11S~lOMERS: BAP,~!E5, BOUAS, 6USHORF, FRY, 4EFBST, KIM~, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSE~IT: COMMISSIOPIERS: NONE
It! WITtdESS WHEREOf, 1 have hereunto se*. my hand this .°~th day of September,
1980,
~~ ,~ 7~...~
~ CRETABY, ANAHEIM CiTY PLANMING COFIMISSION
-2- PC80-145