PC 80-159RESOLUTIC!! ~d0. PCB~-159
A RESOLUTI~N OF TNE ANAHEIM CITY PLANWINf; COMMISSIOPI
THAT FETITIOPI fOk RECLASSIFICATION N0, SO-31-11 BE f,f~AMTED.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Flannina Comnissior. did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification frrxn ERIC NAStf A"~D HEIDI E. NASH, 1c~55 South
Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, California 9280<^~ o~~m ers of certain real property in
the Cfty of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
Lot 104 of 7ract No. 1453, in the City of Anaheim, as per Map
recorded in Book 42, Pages 41 of Miscellaneo~is Maps, records in
the Office of the County Recorder of said County.
WHEftEAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearina at the Ctvic
Center in the City of Anaheim on Septemher 22, 1~50, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 13,03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and reccxnmendations in connection therewith; and
WHERFAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investination and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evider.ce and reports
offered at said hearing, does ftnd and determine the followinq facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property fraa
the RS-7700 (Residential, Sin91e-Family) Zane to the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim Generat Plan desiqnates subject property for
commercial, professional land uses.
3. That the proposed reciassification of subject property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in clcse proximity
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the canmunity.
5. That the proposed reclassiftcation of suhject property requires the
dedicatton and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation
Elenent of the General Flan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic o-~hlch ~vill be
gPnerated by the intensification of land use.
6. That no one indicated their ~resence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence alas received in opposition to the subject
petttion.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FItJDIti~: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject propPrty From t'~c RS-7?00 (Residential,
Single-Family) Zone to the CL (Commercial~ Limited) Zone to permTt commercial use of
resEdent(al structure ~•rith waiver of mtnimum numbe~ of parktng spaces o~ a
PC80-159
t%Fsr:.,
rectan9ularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of aoproximately 5~00 square feet,
having a frontage of approximately 56 feet on the west side of Harbor Boulevard,
having a maximum depth of approximately 100 feet and being located approximately 400
feet north of the centerline of South Street; and does hereby approve the Negative
Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmentai impact report on the
basis that there a~ould be no significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaratton since the
An•~heim General Plan designates the suh~ject property for commercial, professional
land uses commensurate ~•iith the proposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are
involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner
indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impacCs; and
that the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoina findings is on file in the
City of Anaheim Planning Department.
P~OIJ, TNEREFORE, BE IT R~SOL~IED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does he~-eby grant subject Pe~ition for Reclassification and, hy so doing, that Title
13-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the ahove-described
property from the RS-7200 (RESIDE~JTIAL, SIN~LE-FAMILY) Z(1~IE and to incorporate said
described property into the CL (COMMERCIAL, LIMfTED) 7QP1E upnn the fallowing
condttions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequi~~Tte to the proposed use
of subject property in order to preserve the safety ancl general welfare of the
Citizens of the CTty of A~aheim:
1. That the oam er(s) of suhject pro~erty shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 10 feet in ~•~idth from the centerline of the alley for alley
widening purposes.
2, That the vehicular ~iccess rights, except at street and/or alley
openings shall he dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
3. T;~at tiie awner(s) of suLject property sha?T pay the Lraffic sianai
assessme~t fee (Ordinance No. 3896) in a~ amount as determined by the City Council,
for commerclal buildings prior to the issuance of a huiidinci permit or commencement
of any commercial activity. whichever occurs first.
4. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay to the City of AnaheTm
a fee, in an amount as determined hy the City Council, for street liqhting along
Harbor Boulevard.
5. That the proposed gift shop shall comply Hiith all signing requirements
of the CL (Commercial~ Limited) Zone.
6. That subject p~operty shall be develo~ed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1
through 3,
7, Prior to the introduction of an ordtnance rPZaning sub_ject property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2 and ~s, above-mentioned, shall be complete~i, The provisions or
rEghts gra~ted by this resolution shall hecome null and void by action of the
Planning Commission unless said conditions are coriplied ~~fith U~ithin one year from the
date hereof, or such further time as the Plannina Commission may grant.
-2-
PC3%~-t59
~ I ~
II. That Condition ?los. 5 and 5, above-mentioned, shall be complied o-~ith
prior to final building and zonin9 inspections.
BE IT FURTfiER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plannin~ Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance tivith each and all of the conditions herelnabove set forth.
Should any such condition~ or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final Judgmen*_ of any court of competent ,jurisdiction, then this Resolution~
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RFSOLUTIO'I is signe~i and approved by me this 22nd day of
September~ 19£3~,
CHAIRMAM, A!IAHEIM CITY PLA ING COMMISSIOW
ATTEST:
`~~ ~° ~,~._
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIPIG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUN7Y OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Narris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution ~~~as passed and adopted at a meetiny of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on September 2?, 1980, by the folluwing
vote of the memhers thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE~ FRY, HERBST, KING, T~LAR
NOES: COMMISSiONERS: NOME
AIiSEIJT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 22nd day of September,
1g80.
~~.~ .~ ~~,~_
SECRETARY, A^IAHEIPi CI7Y PLANNING COPSMISSION
-3- Pc8n-t5°