PC 80-178RESULU710N N0. PC 80-178
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIh1~~ITY PLANNiNG COMMISSION
THAT PET1710N FOR RECLASSIFICAiION N0. 80-81-12 BE GRRNTED.
WHEREAS, Che Anaheim City Plarning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassificr,tion from EDWA~D ~. PADILLA AND CNERYL L. PADILLA, 4702
Cedar, Yorba Linda, California 92686, o~•~ners of certain real property situated
in ~he City of Anahein, Coun[y of Orange, State of California, described as:
Lots 9, ll, 13 and 51 of Stueckle Subdivision, as per
map thereof recorded in Book 8, Page 43 of Miscellaneous
Maps, records of Orange County, California.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Conmissiu~~ ~id hold a p~blic hearing at the
Civic Center in the City af Anaheim on OcCober 6, 1~80, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing havir,g been duly given as required by law and in accorance with the
provisions of t~e Anaheim Municipal Code, Lhapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
find{ngs ~nd r~cn endatio~s ip connECtioo there~•~ith; s~'d p c he~ring having been
continued to t e P~ann~ng ommission r,~eeting of Oc[ober ~0, Y$~b; ana
WHEREAS, saiJ Commission, after due inspection, invcstiaation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due considera[ion of all evidence and
repnrts offered at said hearing, does find and determine [he follo;iing facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subjec[ property fron
the PD-C (Parking District-Commercial) Zone to the kM-3000 (Residen[ial, Multiple-
Family} Zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designaCes subjecx proper[y for medium
dencity residenti~l land ucec.
3. '~hat the ~roposed reclassification of subject property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the ~roposed reclassification of subject property does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses iocally established in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and their permit[ed uses generally established
throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the
dedication and improvement of abutting alleys in accordance with the Cir~ula[ion
Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in ~ra`fic 4thich will
be generated by [he intensification of land use.
6. Th,3t no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition;
and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IM~,;~~ FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission
has reviewed the proposal to reclassi y subject property from the PD-G(Parking District-
Commercial) Zone to the RM-3000 (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone to permit a one-
lot, 22-unit affordable condominium complcx un a rectangutarty-shaped parcel of land
consisting of approximately 0.89 acre, having a frontag~ of approximately 220 feet
on the north side of South Street, having a maximum depth of approximately 175 feet
and being located approximately 200 feet west of the centerline of Anaheim Boulevard;
and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an
environmental impact report on the basis that there would be no si9nificant
PC80-178
individual or cumulative adver;e environmental impact due to the approva) of [his
Neya*_ive Declaration ,ince the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property
for medium density residential land uses commensurate ~•~ith the proposal; that no
sensi[ive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the lnitial
Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant in~i~~idual or cumulative
adverse environmen[al impacts; and [hat the Negative Declaratiun ~ubs[antiating
tne foregoing findings is on file in [he City of Anaheim Planning Urpa<<;yeni.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim CiCy Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Peti[ion for Reclassification and, by so doi~g, that Title
18-Zening of [he A~aheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
proper[y from the PD-C (PqRKING DISTRICT-COMMERCIAL) ZONE to the P,M-3000 (RESIDENTI4L,
SINGLE-FAMILY) ZUNE upon [he follo:•~ing conditions which are hereby found to be a
necessary prerequ~si[e to tne proposed ~~e of subject proper[y in order to preserve
the safety ar~d general welfare of the Ci[izens of the City of ~~naheim:
1. Tha[ the ot•~ner(s) of subject property sha11 deed to the City ~f Anaheim
a strip of land 10 feet in vridth from the ccnterlire of the north, east and ti•rest alleys
for alley widenin~ purppses.
~. That trash storag~ areas sha)! be provided in accord~nce with approved
plans on file with che Office of the Executive Direc[or of Public Works.
3. That fire hydran[s shall be irsta~led and charged as reG~ired and
determined to be necessary by [he Chief of thr_ Fire Depar[ment nrior to comc!encement
of structural framing,
4. That drainage of subjec[ property sha), be disposed of ir a manner
satisfactory [o [he City Engineer.
5. That the owrer of subject property shall pay to tl,~ City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-,ieu fees as de[errt,ir.ed [o be appropriate by
the City Council, said fe~~s to be paid at the time the building pernit is issued.
6• That [he o4rne~•(s) of subjec:t property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordinance No,. 3896) in an arnount as de[ermined by the City Counci),
for each new da~elling uni[ prior to the issuance of a building per~i~,
7. That subject property shall be scrved by underground u[ilities.
$. That an ordinance rezoning the subject property sha11 in no event
become effective except upon or fo~lowing tl~e recordation of Final Tract Map No,
1125b within th time specified in Governm~nt Code Section 66463.5 or such further
time as the ad~isory agencv or City Council may grant.
9. That subjec[ property shall be developed subs[an!ially in accordance
with p)ans ar. specifications on file with the Ci[y of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos.
1 through 4.
10. 7hat prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. ) and 9, above-mentioned, shalt be completed. The provisions or rights
c~ranted by this resolutior shall become null and void by action of the Planning
Commis~ion unless said conditions are complied with withir, one year from the date
hereof, or such further [ime as the Planning Commission may granC,
-2- PC80-178
~
11. That Condition Nos. Z, 4, 7 and 9, above-nentioned, sha11 be complied
with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FUP,THER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and deternine that the adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance a,ith each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any conditiun or any part thereof, be declared invalid or ~~nenforceable by
the final judgnent of ~~y court of compe[ent juri;diction, then this Resolution, and
any approvals herein contained, sha11 be deer~d nuil ard void.
THE FOP.EGOItJG RESOLUTIOY is signed and approved by me this 20th day of
October, 198G.
~
ATTEST:
~~__'1 .D . . _
aLGG~<~ /~ w w
SECRETARY, ANAHEIn CITY PLANNING COr,MISStOpi
STATE OF CALIFORNtA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF tiNAHE1M )
CkAI AN
ANAHEIM CITY PL~iNNING COY,HIS~ION
~, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of thc Anohcim City Planninr Commission, do
hereby certify that tie foregoing resolutic~n W,,~ ~,-~,.~ _.~~ _,_
~he :"~~.;hcic;~ CiLy Fiarr~ing Commission held on Oc.obe~~ 20,J11930,c,~~`u ai~ a"~eting of
following vo[e of [he membcr, thereol`: ~'30 p.m., by thc
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BOUAS, BUSHOP,E, FRY, HEP.BST, KING AND TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NOME
~N LlITNESS Nhc"REOF~ I have hereunto sec ry hand this 20th d~y of October,
~980.
-3-
r~-C.~;L ~° ,~~~~-~.~.
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C~MMI~SION
Pt30-t)8