PC 80-187~ .~. ~
RESOLUTION tJO. PC3~-1°7
A RESOLUTIOr! OF TII[ /1rIAHE I ~t C 1 TY PLAHt! I~1G CO~t~±l SS I Qr!
RECOM~!~~lD I IJG TO TIIE C I i Y COU~~C I L OF THE C ITY OF A`!AH[ IN
DISAPPRO~IAL OF AtlAHEIH GE~~ERAL PLAt! AME~lDMENT ~70, 1~3
IAND USE ELfMENT.
WHEREAS, The City f,ouncil of the City of Anahcin did id~pt the /lnahetm
General Plan by Resolution No. ~~9R-6~r~~, s!ioti~ing the aeneril cf~,cription and ~xtent of
possible future development of land ~•iithin ~he City; and
WHEREAS, on Se~tember 5, 1~7~, The City Council aporove~l Reclassification
No. 7a-79-6 (RS-A-43~000 [o RS-50Q0) and Conditional Use Permit No, lPb~ (to permit a
35-unit planned unit dcvelooment r~ith a a,a;ver of minimun buildino site area per
dwelling uni[) on approximately 5.0 acres. Cn September 1~1, 197~, the Planning
Comission approved Tentative Tract N~, 9315 (Revision ~Jo. 1) which prooosed a one-
lot~ 35-unit condomintun su6division and on Decemher 3, 1!17q, tfie Planning Corinission
approved a revised plan for construction of 2^ do-~ellin~ units on 4.2 acres; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Deoartment deemed it appropriate, pursuant to the
provisions of the California EnvironmPntai Qualtty Act, to prepare a Negative
Declaration in connection with the C,eneraT Plan Amendr+ent for the f~reqoina area
under consideration; and
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Plannina Cormission did hoid a public hearing at
the Anaheim Civic Center~ Council Chamher, 200 South Anahei^~ Boulevard, Anaheim, on
~~ovember ;, 198~, a[ 1:30 p.~., notice of said puhlic he~ring havinq heen duly given
as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anahein Municipal
Code, to hear and consider evidence for and aaainst said anendment to [he Anaheim
General Plan and to investigate and make findi~gs and recommendat~~ns in connection
there~~rt th; and
WHEREAS~ said Commission. after dun insoccti~n, inv~~tictatf~n ~~.~ c~~~~ty na~~
by )tseif ~nd in its behalf~ and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, DOES NEREBY FIND:
1, That evtdence presented did not substantiate the need for an amendm=n[
to the Anaheim &c^eral Plan at this time.
2. That the Cicy Council considered and adopted the City inttiated General
Plan Amendment No. 11+5 ~Alternate Exhihit "A") on April 18~ 1~7E~ r~hlch changed the
land use designation to Lo~~ Density Residential. A prevision was included in the
approval that a planned uni[ development arould be permi;ted provic'~d chat the densTty
could not exceed seven (7) dwelling units per gross acre.
3. That approximately 20 persons were present at said public hearino and a
petition was submi[ted concatning a~proxir~ately 11+~ signatures of pPrsons in
opposition.
PCBo-tE7
NOW~ TNEREFORE, EE IT RCSOLVED that [he Anaheim City Planninq Ccvnmission
havi.g reviewed tfie prop.sal for a Gen^ral Plan Amendmr_nt to consi~er changing the
eurrent lo+~i densi[y residential designation to Low-Nedium Density ~esidential on an
irre9ularly-shaped arr_a cnnsistin~ of approxim~[ely 4.2 acres located ge~erally
northeast of the intersection of Simmons Avenue and hlaster Street; and does hereby
disapprove the Negative Declaration fron thc requirement to prepare an environmental
lmpact report on the basts that there Yro uld be significant individual ~r cumulative
adverse environmenta) impact due to the approval of this Nenative Declaratio^; that
sensttive environmental impacts are involved in [he proposal; and tha~ *.~~e Initial
Study submitted by the petitioner indicates significant individua{ or cumulative
a~verse envfrorvnental imoacts;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED~ that pursuant to the foregoina findin~s, the Anaheim
City Planning Cor.mission does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City or"
Anaheim disapproval of General Plan Amendment l~o. 163, as follows:
1, That no changes he made to the current 6eneral Plan designation.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and a~prnved by me Chis 3rd day of
November, 1~~0. G~cyt'.~ ~'~ ~'~'~`--
CHA I RHA~I, APIAtiE I M C i TY LANH I NC, COMM I SS ( ON
AT7E5T:
~~=-~ ~ ~~~:-
SECRETIIRY~ A~JAHEIM CITY PLflNNING COMMI5510~!
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORA~JGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Edith L. Harris~ Secrztary of the Anaheim City Planning Commisston. do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adooted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Cortmission held on November 3. 19II~, hy the follo~ring vote
of the menbers thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIO~lERS: QARNES, BOUAS, FRY, NER85T, KINr,~ TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BUSHO4E
ABSENT: COMMi5510NERS: ~IONE
IN ~ITNE55 WNEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3r.i day of November~
ig8o.
~cc~~ .z- ;~~~~.~.-..
SECRET.4RY~ ANAHEIFI CITY PLAPIqiNG COMMISSION
_Z_ PC£3~-187