PC 80-221RESOLUTION N0. PC 80-221
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIPIG COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR VARtANCE N0. 3180 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commtssion did receive a verified
Fetition for Variarce from RANDALL WILLIAM BLA~dCHARD AND CANDACE L. BLANCHARD, 16371
Beach Boulevard, Nuntington Beach, California 92647, owners, and DEFRAPJKSIGN,
INC./DESIGN 2, 3413 West Fordham, Santa Ana, California 92IO~i, agent, of certain real
property situated In tlie City of Anaheim, County of Orange~ State of Caitfornia
described as:
PARCEL A: Parcel 2 as shrnyn on a Map filed in beok 123, pages 44
and 45 of Parcel Maps, records of Orange County~ California.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on December 3, 1980, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly g(ven as required by law and in accordance with the
provistons of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed variance and to tnvestigaYe and make findings
and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHERF.AS, said Commission~ after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itseif and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
t. That the petitioner proposes a waiver of the following to retain a
free-standing sign:
5ECTION 18.05.093.023 - Permitted location of a free-standina siqn.
120 eet rom abutting property permitted;
28-~et existing)
2. That the above-mentioned wa(ver is hereby granted on the basis that the
petitioner demonstrated that a hardship exists in that dental would deprive property
of a privi]ege enjoyed by other propertles in the same zone and vicinity.
3. That there are exceptiona) or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do
not apply generally to the property or ctass of use in the same vicinity and zone.
4, That the requested variance is necessary for ehe preservatlon and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
5. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the proFerty or improvements in such vicinity and zone
in which the property is located.
6. That no one tndfcated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subJect
petitiun.
PCCi1-221
ENVIROtJMEtlTAL 111PACT FIIJDING: The Planning Director or hts authorized
representative has determined that the proposed proJect falls within the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 3, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the City of Anaheim
EnvPronmental Impact Report Guidelines and is, therefiore, categorically exempt from
the requirement to prepare an EIF.
• PlOI•!y THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVF~ that the Anaheim City Planning Commtssion
does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which
are hereby found to be a necessary ~rerequisite to the proposed use of the sub.ject
property in order to preserve the safety and general weifare of the Citizens of the
City oP Anaheim:
1. That subject property shali be developed substanttally in accordance
with plans and specifications on ftle with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1
through 3.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
ftnd and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant~s compliance with each and ali of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction~ then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null 3nd void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOtJ is signed and approved by me thts lst day of
December, 1980,
v ~~~..
CHAIRMAPJ, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNI"JG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~~~ ~
SECRETAR ,~NAH[ 1 T~I C tTY PLAFttJ i NG COMM ISS ( ON
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commisston, do
hereby certify that the foregoing reso2ution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on Decemher i, 19b0, by the following vcte
of the members thereof:
AYES; COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, KING~ TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST
!N WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand thts 1st day of December,
1980.
/ai~1 a'~ „ ~ '
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM C TY PLANNING OMM~ ~SS~pN
-2- PCAn-221