PC 80-50RESOLUTIO~; tJO. PCE~-50
A R[SOL'JT I Oh! OF TH[ AIIAtIE I!-1 C I TY PLAttt! I tdG CON'11 SS I ~N
TH~T PETITIO!I F~R C0~lDITIOPlAL !ISF PER~tIT Pl~l, 2~(7. BL GRAFdTFD
b1HERFl15, the ~lnaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Pet i t i on for Cond i t i ona 1 Use Perm i t f rom ROBERT P. 41r1RM I PI!;TOW ANn LOR I tdG P.
WAR~IINGTO~J, 1(;°5Z I'ale Av~nue, Irvine, California, ~171~~, ovmers, and RENINAMA OF
TOI:YO, ItIC., ELL~1A"!, Pqc50~~nY A"1D BU~KE, One Eci:er Building, Suitc 20~, San
Francisco, California ~41n5, agent, of certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, Caunty ~f Orange, State of California, described as:
Parcel 3. as she~.m on a Parcel Map filed in Book 11?, Pages 19 and
20 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of sald
County.
k~HEP,CAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a~iihlic hearing at the City
f1a11 in the City of Anaheim on Flarch 1~, 1~c~0, at 7:30 P.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required hy la~~: and in a~cordance ~•lith the
provisions of the llnaheim Hunicipal Code, Chapter 1'~.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
mal;e f i nd ings and recommendat i ons i n connect i on therP!•!i th; an~l
4!H[REAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
bY itself and in ~ts behalf, and after due consideratio~ of all evtdence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine t!~e folloarin!~ facts:
1, That the praposed use is properly one for ~•rhich a conciitional use
permit is authorized by llnaheim Hunicipal Code Section 1~.l+1i.~,~1.n~n to wit: to
permit on-sale alcoholic beverages in a restaurant with araiver of:
SEC710N 18,OG.06~.0232 - Minimum numher of parking spaces.
552 spaces required;
5 9+~ proposed)
2, That the requested use is herehy granted, and the ~~~aiver is also
granted on the basis that the reGuest is minimal and that a reciprocal parNing
agreement has been made with the remainder of the surrounding r.ommerctal complex for
mutuat access to all on-site parking ~~ the entire compler,.
3, That the proposed use ~-~i11 not adversely affect the adjoining land uses
and the growth and development of the area in r~hich it is proposed to be located.
tE, That the size and shaNe of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allov: the full development of the proposed use in a manner not de.trir~ental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general Hrolfare of the ~itizens
of the City of Anaheim.
5, That the grantin9 of the Conditional Use Permit under the cnnditions
imposed, If any, ~+ill not be detrimencal to tlie peace, health, safety and general
we)fare of the Citizens of the City uf Analieim.
PCR!1-5~
6. That the traffic generated by Che proposed use ~/~II not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and h(ghaiays designed and improved to carry the traffic fn
the area.
opposition; andhthatnno corresponlencc rsserece~vedenc~ Ot said public hearing in
petition. pposition to the subject
EMVIRONt1ENTAL 1~1PACT FIPlDIPlG: The Planning Director or his authorized
representative has determined that the proposed project fa11s 4rithin the definition
of Categoricai Exem~tions, Class 1, as defir~ed in Paragraph 2 of Yhe City of Anaheim
Envlronmental impact Report Guidelines and is, therefore, categorlca)1y exempt from
the requirement to prepare an EIP,.
PJOIJ, TtIEREFORE, pE IT RESOLVED tnat the Anaheim Clty Plannino Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Condltional Use Permit, upon the folloa~ing
conditions :vhich sre herehy found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in or~er to preserve the safety and general a~elfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anahein:
1. That the proposed restaurant shall comply o-~ith all siqning requirements
of the CL (Commercial~ Limited) zoning.
2. That subject property sha'1 be ~levelooed suhstantially in accordance
H~ith plans and specifications on file ~~ith the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit ~Jos. 1
through G.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Analieim City Planning Commission does hereby
fPnd and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expres~ly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and al) of t!~e cerditiors I~ereinabove set forth.
Shauld any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
bY the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdictlon, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shalt be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOtI is signed and appro~•ed by me this lOth day of
March, 19a0.
_( "~~~ ,/ • 2 a.
ATTEST: ~.HA~RIJOMA"f, A"lAHEIM CITY LANFiIt•1G Cp~S~pN
~~,~1 .~ ~1a,~.~.~:,
SECRETfIRY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAtdNI~~G C0~~~115SIOPJ
-2- PC3n-50
STATE OF CALIFORtdIA )
COUPITY OF ORAhlGE ) ss.
CITY OF A"IAHE1~1 )
!~ Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoiny resolution v~as passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Pianniny Commission held on !larch 10, 1'~30, hy the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIO~lERS: BARPIES, P.IISHORF., DA!/ID, FRY, I1EP,BST, Kltl~, T!1LAR
NOES; COM~IISSIOYERS: flONE
ABSEt!T: COMI11SS10!JERS: NONE
IM WIT~lESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this lOth day of 1lareh,
1980.
~ .~.~. ~° ~.~.
SECRET.4RY, ANAHEtM CITY PLAiINIPIG COMF!ISSION
-3- PCIIO-Sn