PC 80-62I2ESOLUT10~1 r~o. Pc~n-~2
A RESOLUT I ON OF TNE ANAHE I li C I TY PLA~IN I NG COIiM i SS IO~J
THAT PETITIOM FOR RECLASSIFICATIOP! N0, 79-c~0-33 BE GRANTED.
WtiEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from GEtIERAL AM[RICA!i LIFE II•lSURAtIf,E COMPANY, et al,
1630 South Sunkist Street, ~B, ~•^aheim, California ~2806, owners, and THOMP.S E.
NIEMAPl, 1f;30 South Sunkist Street, "6, Anaheim, California 92~3~F, agent, of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as follo~•~s:
PARCEL 1: THE EAST 12.16 ACRES OF LOT 5 AMD TI1AT PORTION OF LOT 4
OF THE TRAVIS TRACT IPI THE CITY OF ANAHEIt1, COUtJTY 0~ ORANGE,
STATE QF CALIFORttIA, AS PER !1AP RECORDED IN BOOf; 5 PAGE 120 OF
MISCELLA~JEQUS RECORDS, I!J T!IE OFFICE OF THE COUMTY P,ECOaDER OF LOS
ANGELES COU~ITY, CAL~=OftMIA, BEINC, A PORTIOtJ OF THE RAtdCHO SANTIAGO
DE SANTA ANA, EXCEPT THAT PO4TIOPJ LYI~dG SQUTHERLY At10
SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWINf DESCRIBED LIyE: BEGItJtdiNG AT THE
t10ST tJORTH~RLY CORfJFR OF THE LAtlD DESLRIBED I~~ TNE DEED TO STATE
0 F CAL I FORt! IA RECORDED ApR I L 20, 1967 I Pl B001: 827_9 , PA ~E 953 ~~
OFF IC IAL RECORDS OF SA I D ORAtdG[ COUIITY, ALSO [3E I t!G A PO! ~JT OPJ A
CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 2~0.00 FEET A
RAD I AL TO SA I D PO I61T BEARS NORTN 45° 03 ~ 0£3" 4lEST; THENCE
NORTfIEASTERLY 3~-~7 FEET ALCtJG SAID CURVE THROUGfi A CENTRAL A~aGLE
OF 8° 50~ 36"; THENCE tJORTH 53° 47~ 28" EAST 251-16 FEET TO THE
BEGIHNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY HAVIt1G A RADIUS OF
700.OQ FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 35Z.~5 FEET ALOtJG SAIQ CURVE
TYROUGH A CENTRNL .4fJr,LE OF 23° 43' 'yb" TG :, PJiHT OF TA'tG~~.CY ltlTtl
THAT CERTAIN COURSE DESCRIBED AS "N 24° 58~ 32~' EAST 712.51 FEET"
IN DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORhIIA RECORDED SEPTEMFiER 18, 1~i64 IPi
BOOK 7224 PAGE 301 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY OF ORANGE;
THENCE ALONG SAID COURSE I•IQRTN 24° 58~ 32" EAST 117.0~ FEET TO ITS
NORTHEASTERLY TERMIWUS BEIPlG ALSO A POIP17 ItJ TfiE SOUTHERLY
PROLODJGAT!OP! OF THE WESTERLY LItIE OF PARCEL 2 OF FtPJAL OkDER OF
COPlDEMNATION SUPERIOP, COUftT CASE IdO. 111+537 RECOR~ED I!J BOOK 7274
PAGE 546 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; NORTfiEASTERLY NORTH 22° 12' 15" EAST
1,1,14 FEET AL~Plr, SAID SOUTtIERLY PR~LOPlGATIOrJ TO TNE NORTIIERLY
LINE OF SAID TRAVIS TRACT. EXCEPT ANY PORTION WITHIN PARCELS 2
AND 3 BELOW; APID
PARCEL 2: COMMENCING AT AN IROP! FIPE THE CENTF.R LINE OF THC,T
CERTAIW PUBLIC HIGNWAY COMMOMLY K"IOWN AS DOUGLASS STREET, WHICN
SA10 IROP! FI!'E MAFKS THE POIPlT OF IPITERSECTION OF SAID CENTER L{:!E
Of DOUGLASS STREET WITH THE ~IORTH LINE OF THE TRAVI5 TRACT, AS
SHOWN ON \ MAP RECORDED I~ DOOK 5, P/1f,E 120 OF P1ISCFLLAPlEOUS
RECORDS Oh LOS AtdGELES COUPI'CY~ CALIFORNIA, SAID I~ON PIPE ALSO
BEING TNE SOUTHEAST CORPlEP, ;lf THAT CERTAIM PROPERTY DESCRIBED I~J
D[ED R[CORDED APRIL 21, 1922 IM BQOK 41E3, PAGE 315 OF DEEDS AND
PC80-62
737t,00GFEETE'JCTHEMCET'SOUTHr1Gs~li~C-~npIOFEETLITO ~TIIEa~TRUEFlVP01 ITA.CO~
BEGIMNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIM DESCP,IQED, SAID POIPIT OF
BEGINIJI~lG BEING DISTANT 10.00 FEET PIORTH AMD 10.00 FEET EAST FROH
A WATER YlELL 4!-Ttl A PU~1P IPlSTALLED THEREIP! ArlD RUNNIPlG THEP1f.E FRON
SAID POI~IT OF ~EGItdF~IPlG WEST, PARALLEL Y11TH THE SAID NORTfI LIPlE OF
Tf{E TRAVIS TRACT 60.00 FEET TO A POIPlT; THEPdCE A? RIGHT A~IGLES
SOUTH 2O.00 FEET TO A POINT; TfIEPJCE AT RI~FIT AtJf;LES EAST o0.00
FEET TO A POIPJT; THEVC[ AT RIGHT ANGLES PJORTH 2O,00 FEET TO THE
TRUE POIfJT OF BEGIPJNIP~G; APlD
PARCEL 3: BEC,INPiI~I; AT THE INTERSECTIOPJ OF TNE CENTER LINE OF
KATELLA AVENUE, FORMERLY STRUCY, AVEPIUE, 60 FEET WIDF, AS DESCRIBED
~N DEED TO SAID ORAMGE COUNTY, RECOftDED IN E300K 611, PAGE 11 OF
SAID DEEDS WITN THE CENTER LI~JE OF DOUGLASS ROqp, ~a11 FEET I~IIDE, AS
DESCRIBED IW DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 632, PAGE 109 OF SAID DEEDS;
THLdCE ALOt1G SAID CEPJTER LI~lE OF Y~ATELLA AVEPIU[, NORTH ~38° 53' 52"
WEST 14G9.32 FEET; TI:Er1CE P~ORTFI 01° 06' ~8" EAST 30,00 FEET TO A
CURVE COP;CAVE SOUTHERLY NAVI~Ir, A RADILS OF t060.00 FEET; THEMC[
ALONG SAID CURVE, EASTERLY, FR011 A TAtdGENT WfIICFI [3EARS NOR7H 77°
Z~~ 18" EAST TNROUGH API ANGLE OF 13° 39~ 5~~~ q~~ ARC DISTAFJCE OF
252.73 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WIThi Ah1D DISTAtJT tJORTHERLY (0 FEET,
FIEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM SAID CEPlTER LINE OF MTELLA AVEPJUE;
THENCE ALO~JG SAID PARqLLEL LINE, SOUTH 39° 53' 52" EAST 23,7~3
FEET; TNEPlCE NORTN 28° 15' S5" EAST 257.3$ FEET; TFIENCE PlORTH 2tp
~8' 32" EAST 712.61 FEET TO THE TRUE FOINT OF BEGI~l~IItJG; TNFMCE
~dORTH 22° 12' 15" EAST 30.56 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF
THE EASTERLY LIFIE OF THAT CERTAIiV LAP~D DESCRII3ED I~ PARCEL 2
ABOVE; THENCE ~IORTHERLY ALO~JG SA I D SOUTHERLY PROLONG~ITI ON T~ Tff~
SOUTHEAST COF.:lE° OT SAiu CEftTNIN LAWD; THENCE IJESTERLY f1LOPIG TfiE
SOUTHERLY LItJE OF SAID CERTAItJ LAND TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID
EAST 46 FEET OF LOT 5; Tf1EPlCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE~
TO A L I NE PARALLEL WI TH SA I D PlORTH L I tJE OF TFIE TRAV I S TRl1CT AtaD
IJHiCH PASSES TNROUGII SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINtJING; THENCE EASTERLY
ALOt1G SA I D LAST-~1EhJT I OPIED PARALLEL L I ~~E TO SA I D TRUE PO I tJT OF
BEG IMP! ItdG.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Comm-sslon did hold a public hearing a*_ the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on Apri) 7, 1930, at 1:3b p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as rec~uired by la~i and in accordance with the
prov9sions of Che Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1£;,~3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, :nvestlgation and study made
by itseif and in its behalf, and after due consideratiur of a11 evidence and reporTs
offered at said hearing, does find and determine [he folloo-~(~g facts:
1. That the petitioner pro{~oses reclassification of subject property from
the PS-a-43,000 (Residential/hgricultural) 2one to the ML (Industrial, ltr~ited} Zone.
"2" Pcao-6z
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designat~s subject property for general
industrial land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary
an~/or desirable fur the orderly and proper development of tfie community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly
relate to the zones and thelr permitted uses locally established in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the
dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accor~3nce with the Clrculation
Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in trafftc 4~hich ~~iil be
generated by the intensification of !and use.
G. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subJect
petition.
ENVIRONNE~~T~L iMPACT FIPlDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
reviewed the proposal to reclassify suhject oroperty from the ks-A-43,000
(RESIDEPJTIAL/AGRICU~TURAL) ZO~JE to the ML (INDUSTRIAL, LIMITEDj 20~lE to construct an
industrial complex on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately 4,66 acres located at the easterly terminus of Sinclair Street having a
maximum depth of approximately 475 feet and being located approximately 250 feet
north of the centerline of Katella Avenue; and does herehy approve the Negative
Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the
basis that there would be no significant tndividual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to the aoproval of this Ne~~tive Derl~ration since t`e
Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for general industrial land uses
commensurate with the proposal; that no sensit)ve environmental impacts are involved
in the proposal; that the Initial Study sub~nitted by the petitioner indicates no
s(gnificant individual or cumulative adverse envi~onmental impacts; and that the
Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of
Anaheim Ptanntng Department.
PJOW, THEREFORE, E~E IT RESOLVED that the Anaheir~ City Planning Commission
does hereby yrant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title
18-ZonTng of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
property fr~m the P,S-A-43,000 (RESIDEPlTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE and to incorporate said
described property into the ML (INDUSTRIAL, LIM!TED) ZOtJE upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general weifare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the owner(s) of suhject Froperty shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 32 feet In width from the certerline of the street along Sinclair
Street for street widening purposes.
-~- PCf30-62
2. That all engineerinq requirements of the City of Anaheim along Sir,clatr
Street including preparation of improvement plans and instailation of all
improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving,
drainage facilitles or other appurtenant ~~~ork, shall be complied with as required by
the Ctty Engineer and in accordance wlth specifications on file in the Office of the
City Englneer; that s*_reet lighting facilities along Sinclair Streetshall be installed
as required by the Office of Utilities Generai tlanager, and in accordance with
specifications on fite in the Office of Utilities General Flanager; and/or that a
bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in an amount and form
satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the
tnstailation of the above-mentioned requirements prior to occupancy.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance a~1th approved
p!ans on file wtth tfie Office of the Executive Director of Public 4/orks.
4. That ftre hydrants shall be installed anci charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement
of structura) framing.
5. That subject property shall be served by underground utflities.
6. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer,
7. In the zvent that subject property is to he divided for the purpose of
sale, lease, or financing, a parcel map, to record the approved diviston of subject
property shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then be
recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder.
~. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic stgnal
assessment fee (Ordinance No. 3896) in an amount as determined by the City Council,
for industriai buiidings prior to the issuance of a building permit.
9. That the driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet in o~idth.
1~. That all proposed structures shall be completely fire sprinklered.
il. That subject property shall be developed suhstantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file ~~ith the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Plos, 1
through 7.
Condit?on2Nos.P1'and 2~ above-mentlonedionshalln bedicomcletedoni"Theubject property,
rights granted by this resolut(on shall become null and void byPaction~of the
Planning Commission unless satd conditions are complied witti within one year from the
date hereof, or such further time as the ?lanning Commission may ~rant.
13. That Condition tlos. 3, 5, 5, ~, 1n a~d ~~~ above-me~tioned shall be
complied with prior t~ final building and zoning inspections.
-4- PC8o-G2
QE IT FURTHER RESOLVED tl,at the Anaheim City Planning C~mmission does hereby
find and determtne that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with ~ach and all of the conditions h~:reinabove set forth.
Should a~y such condi:ion, or any part tfiereaf, be declared inva~!id or unenforceable
by the final judyment of any court of competent jurisdictTon, t:hen this Resaluti~n,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and voic~.
TFIE FOREG01 DIG RESOLIIT I OP! i s s i gned and approved by ne th i s 7th day o` Apr t 1,
t98o.
ATTEST:
~~ ,7 ~.i,.',
SECRETARY, APJq~{E~~q ~~Ty p~qNN~NG COFIMIS510"d
STATE OF CAL I FOKN I~~ )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF F~NAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the An~heim City Planning Commisston, do
hereby certlfy that the foregoing resolution a~as passed and adopted at a meettng of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on April 7, 1980, by the folioa~ing vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARMES, BUSf;ORE, DAVID~ FRY~ HERBST, KIMG
NOES: COPIMISSIONERS: NCNE
ADSENT: COFfM(SSIONERS: TOLAR
IN WITNESS 4JHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hancl this 7th day of Aprii~ lq?p,
(o - L ~Q~~+ ~
SECRETARY, ANAHEfM CITY PLANNIPIG COMMISSION
~
, ; .. : /;.. , ~ ~,. ~
CHA I P,WOMAPI, ANAHE I M C I TY P~ANt! 1 ~!G COMM I SS I OM
'S' PCBo-62