PC 80-66R,ESOLUTI0~1 nl~, p~^~_(,~,
A RESOLUTIQtJ OF TFIE AtlFlHFIM CITY PLA'Itllt;r, C0~1~11551~!1
T;IAT PETITIOtJ FoR RECLasSIFICr~Ttori M0. 7~-3't-3~ B~ GRA"1TEC,
4lHEP,EAS, the Anaheim City Plannin~ Commission did receive a verified
petition for Rec'assification from D[NNIS C. FRY AP!G ERI'•' E. FRY, ET AL, glF<< East
Concord Avenue, Orange, California 92i6], o~~rners of certain real property situat'ed in
*_he City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, de,crihed as follows;
TFIAT PORTIO~; OF DR[YFUS A~JD OTfIEP, LANDS, AS SI10ld19 ON A t1AP OF
SURVEY FiapE BY WILLIAII HAFIEL AMD FILED FQR RECO!;D I!I LOS AtIGELES
COU"lTY, A COPY OF WhIICH IS FILED IM Tf;E OFFICE OF THE CQU~ITY
RECORDER OF SAID OP,AilGE COUNTY ON PAGE 1G3, qH0 F(?LLO;J-Plr~ E001; 3,
ENTITLFD "L05 APIGELES COUP~TY P,ECOR~S", DFSCRIBFp qS F~LLQ41S: TFIE
SOUTFIEASTERLY 2G1 .GG FEET OF TNF PJQRTHtdESTERLY ,~1 , r~r FFET
h1EASURFD AL~MG THE C.EtITER LINE OF EA5T STP,EET OF TNF NQaTHFASTERLY
1F1.5Q FEET h1EASURED PAR~LLEL IJITfI TNF CEtlTER LI~lE OF SOUTH
STREET. EXCEPTI~IG THE~EFRO!1 TH[ NOP,THIlESTERLl' 1n~ FEET OF S.AID
SOUTHEASTERLY 261.46 FEFT.
4lHE2EA5, the City Planning Commis~ion did holcl a nuhlic hearin~ at the City
Fiall in the City of Anaheim on llpril 21, 1?u~, at 1;3n p,m,~ notice of saicl public
hearing havi~g been duly given as required hy la~•~ and in accordance with the
provisions of the M aheim Municipal Code, Chapter ~R,n?~ t~ f~ear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investiqate and make
findings and recommendations in connection there~iith; ind
41HEREFlS, said Commission, after due inspection, invPStigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determin~ t~•^ f~)!~,.;~;;q f~~ts:
the Rhi-1200 (ResldentialPetultiple-Family)S?one,toSflLi(Ind~s~~ia1,~~Limited)~Zone',from
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates sub.ject property rar medium-
density residential and/or industrial land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassificaCion of subject property cioes properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally estahlished in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout tlie community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of suh_ject property reauires the
dedication and improvemenY of abutting streets in acc-~rr;ance with the Circulation
Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increise in traffic which wil) he
generated by t~.e intensi`ication of land use.
PC3n-~(
G. 7hat no one inriirated th~ir pl"rSenCr at sai~+ nuhlic hearina in
opposition; and that or~~ lett~r centainin~ t~,n (1'~) sinnatures ~-ias received in
opposition to the suhjec` petition.
EiJVIROF!'+.F.^1TAL I'1PFlCT FI'lDl~ir,; Th~t th~ Ana~•rin Citv Planninn Co!~mission h~s
revierrec! the ~rnposal t~ reclassi v sui,ject ~rn~ertv fr~r^ the R"~-120f1 (,RFSI~F.41T1/;L,
~1Uf.TIPL.F-F~,~11LY) ?n;!~ to ~II_ ~I~I~~~)STR11l_, LI~11Tf~~) Z0~!'" t~ r^tain a contractor's
storage yard ~~iCh waivers of ninim+im lan~scaped sethacL•, m,v;imum strur.tural height
and maximum fence height on a retangulariv-shan~cJ parcel of l~rd consisting nf
approximately n,~•~ ~cre, having ~ frontayr of anprnxim,~tely 1~1 feet en the west side
of [ast Street, hnving a maxinumdepth of appror.imately i~^ fr.et an~l being lacated
approrimately ;3~ fcet soiith of the cent~rline of South Street; AMn D~FS HCREBY
APPROV[ TNE Negative Declaration from the requirement to nrepare zn environmental
impact report on the basis that there arnuld hr_ no significant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental im~+act duc to the a~provai of this t•le9ative
Declaration since the Anaheim ~eneral Plan destgnates the suhject ?roperty for
medium-density residential land uses comnensurate ~•fith the proposal; that no
sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study
su6mittec by t`~e petitioner inrficates no signtficant individual or cumulative
adverse envi~onmental impacts; and that the Plegative Declaration suhstantiating the
foregoing findings is on file in tiie City of Flnaheim Plannin~ Department.
tIOW, THE:',EFORE, BE IT RESOLNED that the Anaheim City Plannin~ Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, hy so doing, that Title
13-Zoning of the Anaheim ~lunicipal f.ode he amen%ied to exclude the ahove-described
property from the RM-12Q:1 (RESIDEtJTIAL/-AGpICIILTU°,AL) ZOPIE anci to incorporate said
described property into the ML (I~lDL~ST'tIAL, LIMITE~) 7.(1FIE upon the following
conditions ~.yhich are herehy found to be a necessar~ prerenuisite to the proposed use
of subject property in orc;er to preserve the safety and ~en~ral ~•~elfare of the
Citizens of the City of .4naheim:
1. That the o~vner(s) of suhject property shall deed to the City of .~lnaheim
a strip of land 4(? feet in width from the centerline o` the street alono East Street
for street widening purposes.
2. That all en9ineering requirements of the City of Anaheim alonq East
Street including preparation of impr~vement plens and installation of all
im~rovements such as curbs and qutters, sidea~alks, street c~rading and pavinq,
drain~ge facilities or otlier appurtenant worl;, shall he comnlied with as renuired by
the City Engineer and in accordance ~•~ith specifications on file in the Office of the
City Engineer; that street lighting facilities along East Street shall he installed
as required by tf~e Office of Utiliiies Ceneral Manager, an~i in accordance with
specifications on fi1F in the Office of Utilities General ~lanager; anci/or that a
bond, certificate of :fe~~osit, letter of credit, r~r cash, in an amount and form
satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the
installation of t;ie <ibove-mentioned requirements orior to occupancy.
3. ThaC dr~inage of sut~ject ~roperty shall be disposed of in a manner
s~tisfactnry t~ t'i~ f.ity F.n~inePr,
fF. That the existing structure shall he brought up to the minimum
standards of the City of Anaheim, includin~ the Uniform Huildina, Plumbing,
Electrical, 'dechanical and Fire Codes as ~dopted hy the City of Anatieim,
~'- Pc3o-66
5- That tt;e o~mer(s) of su~~ject property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordinance tdo. 3"`~~) in an amount as determine~l by the City Coi.mcll,
for industrial buildings prior to the issuance of a huildin~ oermit,
6. That tiie proposed contractors storage yar~! shall comply with all
signing requirements of the ~"L (industrial, Limited) zoning.
7. That all outdoor storage areas be c~moletelv paved ~•~ith asphalt to a
minimum depth of three (3) lnches.
3. That sut:ject property shall be developed suhstantially in accordance
with pians and specifications on file i•~ith the City of Anaheim narked Fxhihit No. 1,
including a six (~~) foot high blocl: ~•~al l alonn t~ie nerth property 1 ine (Rt1-11.n0
Zoning) and provided th~t the six (6) foot high chatnlink fencP ~aith redwood slatting
may be constructed only ten (1Q) feet from East Street around the parking area
southerly of the house, and must not be constructed closer than forty-one (41) feet
to East Street in front (east) of the residential structure or t~ the north of said
structure.
9. Prior to tfie introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pronerty,
Condition P7os. 1 and 2, ahove-mentioned, shall be completeci. The provisions or
rights granted by this resolution shali become null and voici by action of the
Plannir,g Cammission unless said conditions are complied i•~ith 4iithin one year from the
date hercof, or such further tine as tlze Plannin~ Commission may grant.
1f1, That Conditiens Nos. ?, !., 6, 7, and 2, above mentioned shall he
conplied ~•~ith prior to final building ancl zoning inspections or within a period of
sixty (60) days from the date of aoproval of this reclassification.
BE IT FURTHEP~ RESOLVED that the !!naheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that a~loption of t'iis Resolution is ex{~ressly predicated upon
applicant~s com~liance aiith each and all of the conditions hereinab~ve set forth.
~hould any such condition. ~r any part thereof, be decl~red tnvalid or un~nforceahle
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisclictinn, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOP.E601Nf RESOLUTIO~J ts sinned and apnrove~l h~~ me this 21st day of
April, 1980.
i~ //~
( 4 ~~ G~-r, / _% Gl2~i~-C_., /
CHA I R~:lO~•1Atl, AtIAHF I,M C I TY PLA~!~I I NG Cf1M~1 I SS 10~!
ATTEST:
/y~.t.G(, a~ . %~ta~
SECP,ETARY, ANAHEI~•1 CITY PLANtJIW~ COMHISSIO~!
~3- PC3~-66
STATE OF CALIFORtIIA )
COUhlTY OF ORAI~~E ) ss.
CITY OF /1PIAHEI~1 )
~, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anahein City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoin~ resolution i~ias passed and ado~ted at a meeting af
the Anaheim C1ty planning Com,.,issian held on P,pril ?1, 1~?0, by the folioaring vote of
the members Chereof:
AYES: C0f1MISSI0h1Eft5: BARFlES, QUSIIORE, DAVID, FRY, tIERRST, f;ItJr,~ TOLAR
VOES: COh1~11SSI0NER5: fJONE
AE3Sc"NT: COt4~91SSI0PlERS: IJOIIE
i~! WIT~IESS IJIiEREOF, I have liereunto set my hancl this ?1st day or April,
1980.
~~ ~ ~,~
SECRETAEY, A~lAItE I!1 C i i Y PLAPRI i NG COMM I SS I OPI
-t~- PCII~-C6