PC 80-72r;FSOi_urio~~ ~~o. Pc ;n-7~
A RFSOLUTIOhI OF THE A`IAHEI'•1 CITY PLAtRllrlf, C~~1t115SI0t!
THAT PETITIQtI FOR VARIA~ICE M0. 3146 eF GRA'ITED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City F)anninp Commission did receive a verified
Petition for 1,'ariance from F~t~A!!EIM 110TEL LTD., 2535 ^laricopa Street, Torrance,
California Q~503, owner, and SAP; °EDPn SIG~! C!1, c~.2~~ !liraflores Avenue, San Pedro,
California 90731, agent, of certain real property~situatec in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of California described as:
Pf1RCEL 1: THE SOUTHEA.ST OUAR7ER OF THE SOUTH4IEST QUA^,TER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUFlf<TER OF SECTION 2;, T04!~lSt!IP ~: SOUTN, RA~IGE 10 l•/EST,
S• B• B. E~~1. EXCEPT TIIE IJEST 1 ACRE TfiFREOF. ALSO EXCEPT THE
WEST 24p FEET OF TFIAT PORTIOP~ TFltREOF LYIFJG E/15T 0~ THE EAST Llt:~
OF SAID WEST 1 ACRE~ThERFOF, ALSO EXCEPT A"' UtlDIVIDED 14.G/20THS
ihlTEREST I~J THE IdOP,TH 10 FEET OF THE EAST 60 FEET OF TNF WEST 33~
FEET OF TIIE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF TFIF SOUTHtlEST QUt1RTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QlJARTER OF SAID SECTIOtI 23,
4lNERE~S~ the City Pl~nning Commission did hold a p~~hlic hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on April 21, 1~?0, at 1:3~ p,m., notice of said public
hearing having been duiy given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim llunicipal Code, Chapter 1'.~3, to hear and consider
evidence for and agalnst said proposed variance and to investioate and make findings
and recoMmencfations in connection there~vith; and
IJHEREAS~ said Commission, after due inspection, investig~tion and study made
by itself and in Its hehalf~ an~! aft^r duc consider~~ic,n oE' aii evidence and reports
offe~ed at said liearing, does find and determine the follo~iing facts:
1• That the petitioner proposes a ~iaiver of the f~lloa~ing to construct
signs in the P1L (Industrial, Limited) Zone:
SECTIONS ~a.os.o~~.o~~
and 1.05.09 .012 - Maximun area of free-standing siQns.
1~0 and 3 eet permitted;
2Q2 and 12 square feet requested)
2. That the requested Svaiver is herehy granted, in part, to permit one
182-square foot free-standtng sign but requiring that the entrance sion he not more
than three (3) square feet in size (instead of t~~ielve square feet, as proposed) in
conformance ~aith Code regulations.
3. That there are exceptional er extraordinary -ircumstances or conditions
applicahie to the pro~erty involved or to t`ie intended use of the property that rlo
not apply generally ta the property or class of use in the sane vicinity and ?one.
~*. That the requested var?ance, as grante~f, is necess~ry for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property ric~ht possessed by other
property in the same vicini[y and zone, and denie~i to the property in question.
-2- PCE30-%2
;. That the requested varian~e, as nronted, ~•~ill not be nat^rially
detrimental to the public ~•~elfarc or injurious to the prop~rty or inprove^~ents in
such vieinity and zone in ~ihicii the property is l~cated.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no corresp~ndence ~ias received in ooposition to t!~e subjeet
petition.
EtlVIRO~JME~ITAL IMPACT FIPIDI~lG; The Plannincl ~irector or his authorized
representative has determined that t'ie proposed project falls ~•:ithin the definition
of Cate9orical Exem~tions. Class 3, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the City of Anahein
Environmental Impact Report ~uidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt fro^~
the requirement to prepare an EIR.
~10`rJ, THEREFORF, CE IT RESOL~~ED tFat the Ar~a'~eim City Plannin~ Comnission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the foilcn~ing con~iitions ~yhich
are hereby found to be a neeessary ~rere~uisite to t!~e pror,osed use o` the subjeet
property in order Lo preserve thc s~fety and general t•~elf~re o` th^ f,iti~ens of the
City of Anahein:
1. That subject property shall he develone~l SU~SL7n~iilly in accordance
with plans and specifications on file ~•~ith tne City of Anatiein mar~:ec: Exhihit ~los. i
through 3.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Pla~ning Connission does hcreby
find and determine that adoption of this P,esolution is e:cpressly predicated uoon
applicant's compli~,nce ~•~ith each and all o` the ~onditions h~reinabove set forth.
Should anv such condition, or a~v part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of com~etent jurisdicti~n, thrn this P,esolution~
and any approvals herein contained. shall be deemed null an~i void.
TFIE FOREGC I tJG FESOLUT I O!: i s s i gned ancl annrovc~i hy nc th i s 11 s t day of
April, 195~.
/~ / /
CHA I Rl!OMl1!! ~ A°IA~~E I" L I TY PLAN;11 K6 C':`115510'~
ATTEST:
~~-cJ~ .(~ /~i~-~-
SECRETARY~ ANAtiEIH CITY PLA~t"IING CQM't1551~'I
-2- PCB~-72
STATE OF CALIFOP,~!!A )
COU!!TY OF ORq!~~[ ) ss.
C ITY OF ANAf!=1 ~! )
I, Edith L. fiarris, Secretary of thr_ Anaheim City Pianning Conmission, do
herehy certffy that the forcgoing resolutinn was passed and adoated at a meeting of
the Anaheim Clty Planning Commission helr+ on April 21, 1^?~, hy thc `olloo~ing vote of
the memhers thereof:
AYES: C~4MISSIQ"!ERS: D~VID, F~Y, HER^ST, F;I!!r,, T~~,~n
t10ES: COHMISSIO~IERS: ~ARlJES, BUSHO4''
ABSENT: COMMISSIONEP,S: ~JO!lE
I'~ WIT;lESS 6'HE~:EOF~ I havc hcrcunto 5e[ nv hand this 21st day of i~pril.
7AE0.
i'r~1~w~ ~ ~ n.ii~
SECRETA'tY, A'!l;4E I'+ C ITY PLA'!`I I~~~ CQr!"' I SS ION
-3- PG3~-7~