PC 80-84~~Y
RESOLUTIO~; 1~0. PCB~-~~~
A RESOLUT IOII OF THE A'IAHE I M C I?Y PLP,PJ~11'~~ C7~t'11 SS I ~>I
THAT PETITIOtI FOP. CONDITIO`Il;L USE PER~11T t10. 2^~'1 P.E ~R!1NTE~
'diiEREAS, the Anaheim Ci;y Planrina Cor^ission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from ROP,EP.T 0. GUYOT A'tD PCJ1L K~UPI, ET AL, 35~~
Orangethorpe Avenue, Anaheim, California, °,2~~17, ormers. and MAY SI~E SNELTON, 19643
Monteano Lane, Yorba Linda, California 92GF~, a9ent, of certain real oroperty
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Oranqe, State of California, descrtbed as:
That portion of the Westerly 77.2 acres or Lot i, BiocG: K, Y.rae:rer
Tract, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 12, ~aaes °7 and P~,
Miscellaneous Records, of the County of Los Angeles, lying
Southerly of the centerline of [he land describ~d in Deed to the
State of California recorded Harch 11, 1°37 in Bool: °72~ oaae 3~^
of Official Records. Except that portion lyino Southerly of the
Northerly line of the land described in thc Deed to che Santa fe
Land lm~rovem~nt Comnany, recorded March 1!. 1~1~ in 9ook 177. page
263 of Deeds of said County.
IJHEREAS~ the City Planninq Lom;~isston dic! hold a ouhlic hearina at the City
Hail in the City of Anaheim on May 1~, I~?~, at i:3n o.n., no[icc of said publTc
hearing haviny been duly giv~n as requir~d hy law an~i in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Hunicipal Code, Chanier i°.^;, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit anri t~ inv~stiqate and
make findings and recommendations in c~nnec:ton thereriith; and
kNEREAS, said Commission~ after oue inspection, inv•~sli~~atiun anu sCuuy rodc
by itself and in its behalf, and after due c~nsideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and dPtcrr~ine the f~lloa:in~ facts:
1. That the proposed use is ~raperly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anahelm Municipal Code Section 1?.~~4.n5n,n~n to wit: to
permit on-sale beer and wine in a proposed ~estaurani with a waTver of:
SECTIOH 1~3.Q6.060.0231 - Minimum numher of parklnq soaces.
(173 spaces required;
175 spaces existinq)
2. That the abovc-menttoned waiver Is herety granted on the basis that [he
reques[ is minlmal. amountln9 to a deviance of less than two percent (27,) of the
required numher of parking S!17CA5~ and on the fiaais of thr unusual shaoc of subi-ct
property.
4. That the proposed usr_ a,ill not adverselv aFfec[ thc adjolnln~ land uses
and the growth and development of the areo in whtch it is nropcse~' to he locaLed,
5. Thai the size an~ sha~,e of the site pr~nosed f~r thn usc is .~deau~te to
allow t`~e full development of thc propased use in a manner not detrlmpntil to ihe
PC3~-E~~
partieular arPa nor to the peace, health, safety, and general !~~elfar~ of the Citizens
of ttie City o` Anahei~,
~. That :he 9ranting of the Conditional Use Pe;mit under the conditfons
inposed, if any, ~vill not he detrirnen[al to the peace, he~ith, safety and general
~aelfare of thc Litizens of the City of An~hein,
7. That thc traffic generated by th~ pronosed usc tirill not ~~pose an undue
burden upon the streets and higtio-~ays designed and improved to carry t~.~ traffic in
the area.
9. That no one indieated their presence at said publtc heartng in
opposition; and that no correspo~dence ~•~as recr_ivr_d in ooposition to the subject
petttion.
E!:VIRONME~JTAL IMPACT FI~IDING: The Plannina Director or his authorized
representativc has determined Chat the oroposed eroject falls wtthin the definition
of Categorica) Exemptions~ Ciass 1, as defined ~n Paragraph 7. of the City of Anaheim
E~vironnental Impact Report Gui~lelines an~i is~ therefore, categorical!y exempt from
[he requlrement to prepar~ an EIR.
N~U. THEREF~RE, BE IT °[SOLVED that the Anaheim City Planninn Comnission
dees herehy grant su!-jcc: Petitl;,,-, .`or Ccn~itional Use FeemiE, upon t`~e foiiowing
conditions which are hereby found t~ be a necr_ssary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject p~opcrcy in order to preservP the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. ThaL the proposed restau-ant shall comply with all signing requirements
of thr_ CL (Commercial, Limited) Zonc.
2. Tha[ subjecc oropercy sha!1 he developed suhstantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on fi1P with thn Citv c,f An~heim m~rLna FyF,JhT~ ~~~5, 1
and 2.
BE IT FURiHER RESOLVED that the Anahcim City Planning Cpmmission does hereby
find and determtne that adoption of ihis Resol~tton is exprPSSly predicated upon
applicant's compliance ~+ith each and all of the conditions hereinahove set forth.
Should any such conditton, or anv part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforce•ihle
by the final Judgment of any cour[ of competent jurisdictior :',rn th~~, P,eco;ution.
and any aDp~ovals heretn contained. shall be decmed null and v~,i~.
THE FOREGOINf, RESOLUTI0~1 is signed and aporoved by me this 19th day of May,
1430.
ATTEST:
~--L~ ~ ~~.~
CHA I RIJOMA~I ~ A~tAHE I ~t C I TY PLA~~N I N~ COMM I 55 I ON
~~-~C ~ ~y~.ai
SECREfARV~ V~HEIM CITY LA~INI~Ir, CoyyIS510•!
-7- PC80-Oli
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AtdAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution a~as passed and adooted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on May lQ, 1980, by the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BUSHORE, DAVIU, FRY, HERBST, KIPJG, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITPJESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 19th day of May, 19a0.
~
`~~ ~° i~~
SECRETARY, API,~HEIP1 CITY PLAMNING COMMISSION
-3- PC~o-84