PC 80-92RESOL!ITIOPI ~IO. PC~n-o2
Fl RESOLUTIO~J OF THE A~lAHEIM CITY PLF~II~II~l~ C~~1F11SSION
THAT PETITION FOP, COFIDITIRYAL USE PEP,MIT FlO, 20'10 BE GRAP!TE~
WHEREAS, the Anah^im City Planninq Commission dtd receive a verified
Petitlon for Conditlonal Use Permit from NOR11A f11ChIELLE 0'h~E~J A~I~ HQ,?VEY f141F~~~ ~~~(,~
Hunting Horn Drive, California ~~7~~~ oo-,rers of certain reai property situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Oranyc, State of Californ(a, described as:
TNAT PORTIOPI OF LOT 15, DLOCY, K, YRFlEME4 TRACT, CITY OF FI)LLERT~~l,
COUtlTY OF ORAMGE, STATE OF CALIF02NIA, AS SHO'.J~~ ON A MAP RECOP.OF.D
IPl BOOK 12 PAGES 37 ArID 8~ OF HISC[LI.ArlEOUS RECORDS OF I.OS ANrELEs
CdUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLL04/S: pF.GItItIIP~C AT A PO~~!T I-!
THE WESTERL~f LIPIE OF LOT 15, WHICH !S DISTANT "IQRTHE4LY 2~~2,1~
FEET FROM TFIE ~lORTHWESTERLY CORHER OF THE SOUTHFP,LY HALF OF THE
SOUTHEP,LY HALF OF SAID LOT 15; THE~lCE EASTERLY AL^NR LIFIE PARpLLEL
WITH AND DISTAMT NORTHERLY 242,1n F[ET HEASURED AT RIGHT .4N~(.ES
FRON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY HAL~ QF TME S!1CTltERLY
HAl.F, !1 QISTAPiCE OF 26q,n~ FEET; THEP~CE NORTHERLY A~tn PqRA~,~EL
WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 15, A DISTl1~~CE OF 175,7~ FEET;
THENCE WESTERL'f At~D PAFAII[L IlITH NORTNERLY L I ~IE OF SA i n
SOUTHERIY f1ALF OF TI~E SOUTNERLY HALF, A DISTAHCE OF 2(•Q,~n FEET TO
THE WESTERLY L I NE OF SA ~ D LOT 15; THEr~CE SOiITF!ER~Y ALnyr, SA I D
WESTERLY LINE A DISAtJCE OF 175,~~ FEET TO THE POI~JT OF P.Er,I~I~II"1r,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public heartng at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on June 2, 19Rp, at ~;3~ ~,~.~ notice of saicl ~~~}.ai~
hearing having been duly ~;v.... ~, t~G~~~-~,J ny fati~~ and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anahefm Ftuniclpa) Code, Chapter 1°.n3, to hear and consTder
evidence for and against said proposed cond(ttonai use permit and to i~vestigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection there~vith; ancJ
WHERE/1S, said Comni,sion, aftcr due lnspection, ir.vesttgation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due conslderation of all evtdence and reports
offered at said hearing, does Find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for aihich a condtttonal use
permiY is authorized by Anaheim Hunicipal Co~fe Section lA,~~,~5~.~nn,511 and
1£3.03.030,010 to wit; To permit a public dancing factlity In conJunctfon with a
restaurant.
2. That the proposed use conststing of an adr~ission charge for dancina Is
hereby granted for a periocl of one year, subject to review and consfderation for
possible extensions oC time if it is determined that the usP has not had an adverse
impact on other n:arhy uses.
adjotning3landTuses and tiPie~g~or~th and~ developme~td~oft•1tLhe na~Pa~VinSewhichfeit tts
proposed to be lo::ated.
PC'~-~~
4. That the size and shape ef the site proposed for the use, as granted,
is adequate to allow the full development of the propos~d use in a manner not
detrimertal to the particular area nar to the peace, health, safety, and general
welfare af thc Citiz~ns of the Clty of An~heim.
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under thr_ conditions
imposed, if any, wiil not be detrimental to t:he neace, health, safety anci generai
welfare of the Citizens of the Cfty of Anaheim.
6. That the traffic generated by [he proposed use, as granted, will ~ot
impose an ~ndue burden upon the streets and hight•iays desi~ned and impro~e~ to carry
the traffic in the area.
7. That no one indicated their presence at safd public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received In ~pposit'.~n to th~ subJect
petition.
E~lVIROtlMENTAL IHPACT FIt~Di~IG; That the Anahein City Planr,irg Commission has
reviewed the proposal to permit a public dancing facility on a rectanqularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting o` arproxinately ~.~ acre having a frontage of
approximately 17~ feet on the east sidP of Kraemer Boulrvard, havinq a maximum depth
of approximateiy 2iF feet and being located approxtr~atclY 2j~2 feet south of the
centerline of Coronado Street; and does herehy apProve the tJegative Declaration from
the requir2ment to pre(~are an environmental impact report on the basis that there
would be no sign(ficant indtvidual or cumulativA adverse environmental impact ~1ue to
the approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anahein General Plan designates
the subject property for general indus[rtal land uses comnensurate with the proposal;
that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the
Initial Study submitted by thc petitioner indir_ates n~ si~nificant indtvidual or
cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration
s~~hsi?nt3~rln~ `h~ f~r..~~t~~ ft.~~ii....~ j~ ~~ ci~~ ;r .`;C .`~FL~' C~ :Zr3~Ct~'; S'I1JiTIRy
Department.
NOW~ THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLI~ED that the Anaheim City Planninq Commission
doe~ hereby r,rart s~bject Petitiun for Conditional Use Permit, uoon the following
conditions ~•~!~1ch are hereby fo~~nd to be a necPssary prerequisi[c to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to prr_serve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That street lighting facilities along Kraener 3oulev~rd shall be
installed as required by the Officr of 1ltilities General Manager~ and in accordance
with speclffcations on f11e in the Office of Utilities General Manae~er; and/or that
a bond. certiFicate of deposit, letter of credit~ or cash, in an amount and form
satisfactory to the City of Ana!,eim shall he posted with the City to guarantee the
installation of the ahove-mentloned r~quir~ments prtor to occupancy.
2, That subject proper[y shall he devrloped substantially in accordance
with plans and specificattons on fTle ~rith [he City of llnatieim r^arked Exh;bit t•!o. 1.
3. That Conditlon No. 1, above-mentioned~ shall he compliectt.rith prior to
ttie conmencement of the activity authorized under thts resolutton, or prlor to the
tlme that the hulldtn~ permtt is issued, or wtttitn a period of ~ne year from date
-^- PC::n-~2
hereof, vrhichever occurs first, or such further time as the Planning Commisslon may
grant.
~~, That Condition No. 2, ahove-~entioned, shall he co-~plied with orior to
final building and zon(ng inspections.
5, That the use is hereby granted for a perio~ of one (1) year~ subject to
revie~•+ and consideration for ~ossihle extensions or time by the Planning Commission
upon w~it'en request by the petitiorers, if it is determined that the use has not had
an adverse impact on other nearhy uses.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVCD that the Anaheim City Planning Lor.mission does herehy
find and dEterninc that adoption of [his Zesolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance ~~~ith aach and al~ of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
S~iould any such condition, or any part thereof, be deciared inva'id or une~forceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolutton,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOItlG 4FSOLUTION is signed and approvcd by me this 2nd day of June,
1980.
~ ~~.,~/ . ~ ~~o~ ~ ~
GNAlftll~"A~t~ A!dANE1H Cii1 FLA~~tii~i„ CR~"t5Sl0!!
ATTEST:
` oL[. ~ .~ • ~~~ -
SEGRETARY, A!lAHEiN CITY PL.4t!1(I~l, COH'tlSSIO`!
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COU~lTY OF ORA-IGE ) ss.
~lTy OF AFIANEIN )
1, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of thc Anaheim City Pla~nino Commisslon, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolutTon o-,as passed ~n~ a~iopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Cortmission hcld on June 2, 1°, hy the foll~•~ing vote of
the me~bers thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIO~lERS: BAR~lES, BU5110RE. J4VID. FRY, KING, TOLAR
i~dES: CONMISS IODJERS: NO:JE
ABSENT: COM`115510NFR5: HERQST
W1T11E55 WHEREOF~ I have hereunto set my hand this 2nd day of June. i?A0.
`~~ ~° ~ ~
SEC.°.ET~RY, ANAHFI-! CITY PLA"I~~Irtr, CnMMIS510N
-3- PC3~-^?