PC 81-106RESOLUi IC~;! II~, FC;1-1~~~~
A RESCLUTI0~1 (1F TN~. ~'dl1H~l~t CiTY PLA'1hJi'!~ CO't'?ISSIOt!
THAT P~TIT10~1 FOR CO:~DITIn~i~L USE PCR!11T N~. ,^_?1~1 CC rn~~~TF~,
F~H[REAS, the Anahcim City Plannin~i Cnr~missibn did r~ccive a verified
Petition f~r Conditional Use Perr,it fre~ EL~ER? L. S!11TN AtID LID/1 L. S`11Tf', 12~7.1
Wheeler P>>cc, Sa~ta Ana, Californi~, ^27'~>, o~:mers, ancl BUf~r,ET RFt!T-4-CF,P ~F ORANGE
COUNTY, ~{~~~~ Campus Driv~, ~leo-~port [ieach, California ~2!,~,0, ~9ent, of certain reai
property situated in thc City of Rnaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as:
PARCEL 1• THAT PORTIOtI OF THE NORTHE~ST Qlll1RTER OF SFCTlOiJ 7.2,
TOSPIVf; I P k SOUT~f, RANGE 1 n WEST, i'~ TI1E RAPICHO SAN JU1i! CFlJC`N DE
SAtITA A!!A, AS SAID SECTION IS SHOId~I Ot: A P!AP RFCO~~ED I~I BCGY. ~1,
PAGE 10, OF t115CE~LAflE0U5 HAPS, I~I TFIE OFFICF OF THE COUNTY
RECORf1ER OF SAID COUt:TY, DESCCI~ED AS FOLL(ll!S: 6EGIIJNI~t~ AT A
F01"IT 0'I THE SOUTHERLY LIP7E OF TN[ LA'1~ DFSCRI9ED I!I D[ED T~ THF
SiATE OF CALIFORtJI.A, RECOP.DED MAY 5, 1~~~, I'J [300K ?M~;, PA~ES ~~iS
AI!D 53°, OF OF~ICIIL RECO.°,D~, EF,ST[^LY 21~.04 FEET F^,~~; TIIC CE';TCP
LI!JE OF HARFOR BOULEV~1?D; THEtlC[ SCUT!I 0 DFf,. 1~' ,'.~" E^,ST 15'?.~~
FFET, Pl1R~.LLEL WITH 5l11J CEdT~fi LIHE OF }IARRO~ DOfILEV"~P.n~ TF{rtlCE
SDUTN S~ DEG. 57' ~~~~ 4't~T 150,00 FFcT TO A LINF PARl1LLEL WI?H A!dD
EASTERLY 5~.00 FEE? F~0'1 ~~~ID CENTE~ LI'!F OF HARftOR BOItLF.NARn;
TIIEPIC[ r1~RTtl 0 DEG. 1G' ?j" 41EST ALO"1G Sl1iD PARALL[:L LI'JF, 1~~'~.cr,
FFET TO SA I D SOL'TNEP,LY L! ~dE OF THE L!1'!D T~ T!!F ST0.TE OF
CAL I FORt! ~,q ~ THEtICF CONT I t1U I tIS ALOFIG SA I D SOUTHER!.Y L I NE NOP.TH ~!~'
DEG. 11' 2~~" EAST 8.1:3 FEET A'ID tJ~RTH ~~ DE~. 57' '?!7" E4ST i1~3.~~
PE[T T~ THE POItJT OF DEGIMNIW~,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commiss~on d(d hold ~ puhllc hearin9 at tnA Civic
Center in the City of Anahcim on ~ta•; '~, 1~81, at 1:3^ P.~n., notice of said ~ublic
hear i ng ~~avi ng hcen du lv g i ven a, requ i red hy i at~1 and i n accordance ~•~i th the
provisions of the Hnaheim Ptunicipal Code, Chapter 1%'.^3, t~ hear and consider
evidence for and agai~st said proposed conditional use permft and to investiaate anc~
r~~~;P findings and recominendations in connection t!iere~•iith; and
WHEREAS, said Comnission, after due inspection, ~nvest(gatinn and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of a11 evidence and reports
offered at said hearinn, does find and dete m ine the folloa~ing facts:
i. That the prapcsed use is nroocrly one `~r aihich ~ condttional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim ~1unicipal Code Section 1'>,~3,~3r.,~~n to wit: to
trn~nc; an exis:ing automohilc rental 'a~iencv.
,
. ~hat the pronosed use, cnnsistin~i of an auC~robile r~ntal ageney at a
eom,~rted~servie~ st~ti~n, is hcr~',y ~rant^d f<~r ~ n~ri~~{ ~f ~~,. (;'~) months, to
expire ~n f;oveinbcr l:>, l~ul.
3. That t`ie pron~sed u,~e is hcrehy nrant~d su~ject t~ the following
stipulati~ns made hy rh~ pr,ti[i~n~~r ~t th,~ ~,i~F-~ir, ti~arinc~:
PCtil-1!1(
~• That thert~ shall he no m~rr than ?~ rent~l vehicles stored on-site at
~ny one timr.. -
h• That there sh~11 `>e no r~~tai 1 sales ~f aasol inr..
~• That the m~st ~ ~rtherly drive~~,a~ on Ilarhor f3oulevard and the mast
westerly drive~~~ay ,!lanchester Avenue sha)1 be temnorarily closed for
the six monYh ~~o~l o` Che use nermit hy a means acceptahle to t~~e
City Traffic Enaincer.
i~• That the proposed use, as qranted, ~~i~' not adversely affect the
adjoining land uses and the 9ro~•~th and devclopment of the area in ~~rhich it ~S
proposed to he ic~cated,
5. That nc~ sizr. and shape of the site pro~osed for the use is adr_quate to
allow the full development of the prop~sed use in a manner n~t detrimental to the
particuiar area nar to the peace, heaitr~, safety, and cteneral welrare of the Citizens
of the ~~ tY of F,nahe im,
~. That the grantinp of the Conc:itional Use Perroit under the con~iitions
imposed, ~f o~y, ~•i~~~ not be detrim~nta) to the ~eace, he,~lth, safety 3n~i aenera~
~•relfare of ;'~e Citizens o` the City of A.naF:ein,
7. That the traffic ~lenerated by the pronosed use ~•rill nnt impese an undue
burden ur.on the streets and hiciht~avs desiq~ed and imprnv~~d t~> carri t`~e traffic i~
th~, area.
~- That no on^ indieated their nresence at said riiblie hearinc~ in
opposition; and that no corres~ondenc~ ~•~as receive~:i in o~positi~n to the subject
petition.
EPJ~IIRONMctJTA~ IMPACT FIPlDIPlG: That *he Anaheira City Planning CommlSSion has
~ . ~, _
~'u~~~:•%~~ -~'~ i~ruF~usai ~o ex~~onu an existing iutomohi?e rental agene on e
rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximatPly '~.5 acre located at
the southeast corner of ~lanchester Avenue and Har~~or fioulevard (t%~!;0 South Harbor
Boulevard); and does herehy a~prove the IJegative Declaration frori the requirement to
prepare an environmental impact reF~ort on the basis that there ~~au7d be r,o
significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval
of this PJegative Declaration since the Anaheim Generai Plan designates the subject
property for commercial recreational iand uses commensurate viith the proposal; [hat
no sensitive envir•onnental impacts are involved in the prn~osal; that tiie Initial
Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual cr cumulative
adverse environmen[al impacts; and that the Plegative Declaration suhstantiating the
fore~oir,g findings is on file +n the C+ty of Anah~im Planninq Department,
~IOIl, THEREFOP,E, QE IT R~SOLvED that t~e Anaheim CitY Planning Commission
does nerebY 9rant sui,i~~t Petition for ~onditional Use Per~it, upon the follow'ng
eonditions ~vhich are herel~y found ro be ~ necessary prerenuisitc~ to the pronnsed use
of the suhj~:ct property in order to preserve the safat~~ and ~eneral welfare of the
Citizens of tlie City of Anaheim:
1. That the mnst o-~esterly drivc,;;~, on ttanchcstr_r Avenue. and the mosc
northerly driveway on Harbor Boulevard shall be temo~ra~ily closed for the six (5)
month period of tk~is use pe*mit by a mcans acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer.
-2- PC81-106
Z• That subject Pruperty ;nal) he [)~'Jnlnpeu suhstan*_ial)v in accordance
wit''ri plons and speciricati~ns on file ~•iith t'~c ~it~ of !'~,naheim markecJ Exhihit tlos. 1
and 7.
~• That Condition Nos. 1 i~~ ?;h.~~~ he comnlc~ted ~.:~it~in ~~eriod of sixty
!60) days from ChP d~te hr..rr_of or nrir.;r t~ commencem~nt of the activity herein
approved, ~•~hichever occurs first.
4' That the use, as prc,~osed, is nrantn_d for a peri~d of sir. (G1 months to
expire on '~ovember 1;;, ~~3u1.
BF !T FURTlfER RESOLVED tfiat the Anafieim City Planrin~ Commission does hereby
find and determine that the adoption nf this Resolutinn is ex,pressiy preclicated upon
applicant~s cornpliance ~:~ith each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any condition or any part t}iereof, be declared invalid or unenforceabie by the
final judgment of any court of competen* jurisdiction, then this Resolution, a„d any
aporovals here~~ ~~ntained, shall be cJeemed null and void,
THE FOREGOIIlG RESOLUTIOtI is si~ned and approved by me this 1"th day of ~1ay~
l~iil.
~.......~~. ~Z. I
~HAIftFi!11! PP~ TtMroRr_
A!:AHEIM CITY PLA~JNIMr C~~"~!!ISSIOr!
ATTEST:
(~ 0~-~--~v ,~ ~~+.t _~2
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAP~NIN, C~~IMISS~O~~
-3- PC3i-10'
STl'~TE OF CP+L 1 FOR~I I~; )
COl!PJTY OF ORA~lGE ) ,,,
CITY OF ~~lAHEI~1 )
1, Edith L. Harris, Seeretary of the llnaheim City Planninp Commission, do
herehy certify that the f~regoina r~solution ti:~as nassed and ari~pted at a mceting of
thc Anaheim City Planning Comnissior. neld on '1av l~', 1`131, at 1:30 p.m., hy the
fo11o~•~ing vote of the members t'~creof:
AYES: COr~~11SS10'J~RS• [3ARNcS~ f30U:~>, BUSHO^~~ FRY~ HFRRST~ Y,I~!^
NOES: CQT1'11SSIOIIERS: "lONE
ABSEhIT: C~~`"~11SSIOrdERS; T~LAR
iH WITtI[~S w'NEREOF, I hove hcrrunto se' c;~~ hand this 1°th day of Hay, 19~~.
~ ~ / .~ s ~
~ d~-~. ~C . ~4l.~Cit.i~.u~
SEC?ETAR1, A^!llHEl~! CITY PLANNI`1r, CO'1~1155lO~d
-~+- ~r.3i-~oG