PC 81-116RESOLUTIOM td0. PC31-11~
!1 RESOLUTIO?J ('~ THE /1~AHEIH CITY PL/1^l~dl~•IG f0!411SSI~F!
THAT PETITIOt! FOR RECLASSlFICATIOtJ ~IO. pn-:~it-37 RE G4APITFD.
WHE4[AS, the Anaheim City Planning Commissfon did receive a verPfied
pet i t i on for Rec l ass i f i cat ion from JAPIES R, ~IEEDFIAI~ A~lD SH I RLEY A, tIEFDIIA"1, 9~E92
Sandra Circle, Villa Park, California ~2Fh7, owners of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County ot Orange, State of Csllfornia, describer as:
Beginnirg at a point in the Dlorth line of Vin~~~ar•d Lot A-1, as
shown on a P1ap recorded in bool: 1F, paces !7.9 and ~~3~ of Deeds,
records of Los Angetes County, Calirornia, sald point beinn 161+
feet Westerly of the Northeast c~rner thereof; r~~nnina thence
Southerly parallel to the Easterly line of said Lot, 225 feet;
thence Westerly paralle] to the ~Jortherly line of said Lot 75
feet; thence Northerly parallel to said Easterly line, 1_7_5 feet to
a point in the said Northerly line; tF.ence Easterly along said
Northerly line 75 feet to the point of beginnin4,
WHEREAS, the City P;anning Commission did hold a public hearing at thP Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on June 1, 1~181, at 1:3~ p.m „ notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required hy la~~~ and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim hlunicipal Code, Chapter 1n.~3, to hear ar.ri consider
evidence for and against said proposed rerlassiffcation and to investigate and mal:e
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due insnection, investiyation and study made
by itself and fn its behalf, and after due c~nsideration ~f a!1 evidence a~d reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the f~llo4~in~ facts:
1. That the petitioner pro~oses reclasslfication of suhject property from
.-i__ n~_-r~nn fo., s~,. ,~ c; ,.1~-r.,...i~..\ o.. o-~, n~.~_~I.nn (o.. i-I..nt7~1 M~~t~in~~-
~.. .. ~~ ..., ~ ..~~ ~.. ~ ~~ ...., ~ ~~... ,._ . ,.. ,_... ,.. . -' , - -
family) Zone to construct a 6-unit apartment complex.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates suf~ject property for medtum-
density residentlal land uses.
3. That the propo;ed reclassificatfon of subject property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of tyP community.
~+. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close praxim'ty
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the community.
5. That the ~roposed reciasslfication of sub.Ject property requires the
dedication and improvement of af~utting streets in accordance a~(th the Cfrculation
Elemen*_ of the (;eneral Plan, duA to the anticipated increase in traffic ~ohich will 6e
9eneratec: by the intensification of Yand use.
PC81-11G
G. That !+ persons indic~ted their presence at said ~ublic hearinq in
oPPosition; and tiiat no correspordenc~ iias received in opnosition ta the subjeci
petition.
E~lUIROf~14E~1Tl1L 1~1Pl1CT FIi~1DIFIG: That the Anaheim C~t~~ Planni~g Commission has
reviewed the proposal ro reciassify suhject ~roperty from the RS-j7_On (Residential,
Singl~-Family) 7.one to the RH-24n0 (Residential, ~1ultipie-Family) %one to construet a
6-unit a~artment complex on a rectangularly-shaned narcel of land consisting of
approximately 0,;9 acre, havin~ a frontag~ of approximately 7!" feet on the south side
of North Street, havin~ a maximum deoth of anproximately 27_5 feet and heing located
approximately 200 feet ~•~est of the centerline ~f [ast Street (1~28 Fast ~lorth
Street}; and does he reby approve ti~e ~degative Declaration from the r~quirement to
prepare an environm~ntal impact report on the basis that ther~ would be no
significant individual or cumulative adverse envi mnmental impact due to the approval
of this P~egative Declaration since tiie Anaheim General Plan designates the subject
property for medium-density residAntial land uses commer.surate ~•~ith the proposal;
that no sensitive environmenta~ im~acts are involved in the proposal; that the
InitTal Study submitted Fy the petitioner indicates no significant individual or
cumulatfve adverse environmental impacts, and that th~ Plegativ~ 'leelaration
suhstantiatirq the foregoing findings is on file in the City of dlnaheim Planning
Department.
PJOId, THEREFORE, BE IT P,ESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassific~tion and, hy so doina, that Title
18-Zoni~a of Che Anaheim 1lunicipal Code he amended to exclude the above-described
proPerty from the "5-7200 (RESIDFtITfAL, Slt1GLE-FAMILY) ZO~IF and to incerporate said
descrihed property into the Rlq-2~+Q0 (RESIDENTIFII_, MULTIPLF-FAMILY) 7ptJE upon the
following conditions t~~hich are her~hy found to be a necessary ~rerequisite to the
proposed use of suhject preoerty in order to preserve the safety and cieneral ~delfare
of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That side~iall;s shall he installed along North Street as required by the
City Engineer and in accorda~ce with standard plans and specifications on file in the
Gf f i eP of the ~ i r" F~., i ~r+r.r
2, That the o~:!ner(s) of suhject p mnerty ,hall pay to the City of Anaheim
a fee, in an amoimt as determin~d hy the C?ty Council, fc,r street liphting alono
North Street.
3. That the a~m er(s) of suhject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
a fee, in an amount as determined by the City Council, for tree plantinq purposes
alona Worth Street.
4• That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance ~~ith approved
plans on file ~•~ith t;~e Office of the Executive Direetor of Puhlic blorKS.
5. That suhject property sha)1 be served ~,y underground utilittes.
G. That drainage of suhject nroperty shall he di~oosed of in a manner
satisfactory to tfie City En9ine~r,
7. That ~he oamcr of suhject ~rnperty sh,~~ p~,; to the City of Anaheim the
approoriate park and recreation in-lieu fecs as detc~rmined to !~.r, ~ppropriate ~y the
City Council, sa)d fec. to he paid at th~ time the buildinq perm?t is 'ssuad,
-?- PC81-716
~• That the otvner(s) of su!~ject prnperty shall pav thP traffic signal
assessment `ee (Ordinance rdo, 33~G) in an amount as determineci hy tf,e City Council,
for each r.ew d~~ielling unit pri~r t~ the issuance of a huildPn~ permit,
°. That suhjeet y
pro~,ert shall he ~ieveloped substantially tn accordance
with plans and specifications on file ti~~th the City of ~nahein markerl Exhihit Plos. 1
and 2; provideci, however, that thc 42 inch high masonry ~•~all on the north property
llne along Plorth Street sha11 he constructed of a decorative masonry mate~ial.
~~• Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 7_ and 3, above-mentioned, shall be coripleted, 7hP provisions or
rights granted by this resolution sha)1 become null ~nd void hy action of the
Planning Commission unless said cc~nditions ar, cornplied 1•~ith ~rithin one year from the
date hereof, or suc!i further time as the Planning Comm(sston may grant.
>>. That Condition Nos. 1 t, r
complied ~vitli prior to finat building and zoning inspec~ttons~hove-mentioned, shall be
DE IT FURTHER RFSOLVED that thc Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoptton of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
apPlicant's comp)iance with each and all of the cnnditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any s~ch condition, or any par~ tnereofr he declared invalid or unenforr_eable
by the final judgnent of any court of cor,~petent jurtsdictton, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void,
TNE FCREr,pIiJG RESbLUT10!! is siqne~i and anpr~veri hy n~ t5is Ist ~ay of Ju~~~
1981.
ATTEST:
[~ ~/ f ~ .C ~El, l.~t.c_..
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM C-IT`y p~qNpolNr, C.OMMISg~O~~
'.~ ~ ~'~?~
CNAIRNAM, Ap7AHEl~1 C!TY Lnr:M1ii~!c r- n~~~~~,
STATE OF CALIFORFlIA )
CQUhJTY OF ORA~~GE ) ss.
CITY OF ~~JAHEIM )
~, Edith L. Flarris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon, do
P~reby certify that the fore3oing resolution was passed and adopted at a me.eting ~Q
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on •'une 1, 1~~1, by the follo~•,inq vote of
the members thereor':
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: 6~1RNES, FRY, HERP,ST, IUrar,
WOES: COMMISSIOiJCiS: 30Ul~S, t3USfipRE~ Tn~,q(?.
ABSENT: C0~IPIIS5IU"JEP,S: t,lOtlF
IN lJI7~IF.SS WFIEREOF~ I have ~iereunto set my han~ this Ist day of June, 1Q31,
~
~~X C-~.~~ ~ ~^
SECRETARY, ANAHE ~'~ C I TY PLAtJt) I NG CO!1M I SS I ON
--- -3- PC8t-11(