PC 81-123ZESULUTiQM t70. FCF.i1-1?
A RESOLUTIOtJ OF Tfl~ /1PIAHEIM CITY PI_A~!~JI'!~ C0~1!iI~S10"I
THAT PETITI0;1 FOR f,0~!~ITI')fl11L ~1SF PER!11T t;0, 2?21 BE GP,AP!TE~
4IHEP,EAS, th~ /lniheim City Planninn Commission did receive a verified
Petition `or Conditional Use Perr~it from Ji~l!N TIFFEMTHALER AtJ~ ELIZABETH
TIEFENTHALER, 200 ld~st Ball Road, Anaheir~, Califorr.ia ~2°~r, o~•mers of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of f,alifornia,
described as:
Lot 51+ of Tract No. 2f1~0, as shoi•rn on a Map recorded in book 61,
panes ;~, and 3~ of P1lscellaneous Maps, records of Crange County,
California.
IJNEP,EAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the C1ty of llnaheim on June 1, i9u1, at 1:3^ p.r~., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by ia~.r and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Hunicipal Code, Chapter 1R,03, to hear and consider
evidence for and aqainst said proposed conditional use ~ermit and to investiqaY.e and
make findings ard recommendations in connection therewith: and
WHEREAS, said Commission, aftcr due inspection, investigation anr! study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearin~, does find and determine the followin~ facts:
1. That the proposed i~se is nrooerlv one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municioal Code Section lc',.~;,~~;~,010 t~ Wit. «
permit a lawnmo~~~er repair and sa~o sharnening sho~.
-'-. Th~t .;~ prcpcs:~d use is %iere~y granted for a period of two (2) years
subject to revie~~~ for possible timr_ extensions unon ~•~ritten request by the
petitioner, if the Planning Commission determines thzt ~he use has not had a
detrimental effect on the nearhy residenc~s and businesses.
3. That the proposed use f~iil not adverseiy affect the adjoining land uses
and the g;otia[h and development of the area ir. a~hich it is proposeci to he lncated,
~+. 7hat the size and shape of the site proposed f~r the use Is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular a;ea nor to the p^ace, health, safety, and general welf~re of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
S. That the granCing oT the Condittonal Use Perrit under the conditions
imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, saf.rty and general
~~elfare o` ~he Citizens of the City af /lnahe;m,
6. That the traffic ,enerated by the proposed use ~-~ill nnt impose an undue
burden upon the streets and high~•rays designe~: and Impl'pVnc'i tn carry the traffic in
th~ area.
Fcsi-iz3
?. Tha[ no ~?ne indieated their nresenee at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspr,ndenc~ ~•~as received in ~~nn;itirn tn the subject
petiT.ion.
EPIVIROH'1Ef;"fl1L IMPl1CT FI`1DiPl~: That tlie Anaheim City Planninq Commission has
reviewed the proposal to permit a la~-rnmo~•~er repair and saw sharpening shop on a
rectangularly-shaped parcel of land c~nsistinn of anproxinately ~,?3F square feet,
havinc! a frontage of a~pror,imately 6G feet on the south side of f3a11 Road,
approximately 3(70 fe~_t east of Claremont Street (7-00 East Dall P.o~~f); and does hereby
approve th~ Negative Declaration from the rrquirement t~ pr~nare an environmental
impact report on the hasis that there ~•~ould be no sinnificant individual or
cumulative adverse ervironmental im~act ~1u~ to t~~e a~pr~val of t!~is Neqative
Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan d~siqnates the subject property for
commercial-professional land uses commensurate rrith tne ~roposal; rhat no sensitive
environmental impacts are involved in the oronosal; that the initial Study submitted
by the petitioner indicates no sianificant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impacts; and thaY. the Negative Declaration subsr~ntiatlna the foreqoing
findings is on filA 1n the City of Flnaheim Pl~nning Deoartment.
NOId, THEREf"ORE, BE IT RESOLVFD that the /lnaheim City Planning Commission
does her~by grant suhject Petition for Conditionai Use Pcrmit, upon the following
conditions ~~hich are herehy found to he a necessary prereouisite to ~he proposed use.
o` the suhject property in ord~r to preserve the safaty and ~eneral welfare of the
Citizens of the City of /lnaheim:
1. That the owner(s) of suhject property shall dend ±c, rhe r_ity of Anaheim
a strip of land 53 feet in ~•~idth from the centerline of the strc~t along f3all Road
for street widening nurposes.
2. That the ou!ner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
a fee, in an amount as determined hy the City Council, for street liclhting alona Ball
Road.
3. That the oi-m er(s) of sunject prnperty shall nav to the City of Anaheim
a fee, in an amount as determined by the City C~uncil, for tree plantinq purposes
~long Ball Road.
It. That suhject property shall he developerl suhstantially in accordance
with plans and specifi~ations on file a~ith the City of Anaheim marked Exhihit No, 1,
S. That Condition ~dos, 1, 2 and 3, ahove-mentioned, shall be complied wlth
prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior
to the time that the building permit is issued, or within a period of one year from
date hereoT, ~,rhichev~r occurs first, or such further time as the Planning Commission
may ~rant.
6. That Condition No. !E, ahove-menttoned, shaii he c~mpl!eclt•11th prior to
final buildin~ anci zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTHER RPSOLVF.D that the Anaheim City Planning Commission ~ioes herehy
find and dcterriine that adoption of this Resolution is exrr~ssly predicated upon
a~plicant's compliance ~~ith each anu all of the c~nditions herAinahovP set forth,
Should any such con~ition, or any ,~art thereof, be declared irvalid or unenforteable
-2- PC31-123
by the f+nal judgment of any court of cornpetent jurisdicr.i~n, then this Resolution,
and any annrova?s hcrein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
T11[ FOR[GOIM~ °.~SOLUTIO~! is signed and approved by me this lst day of Jun~,
1~31.
~~-., l.~ U ~~~-
ChtAIR d~Fl, /1t~IP,HEl11 CITY PL~r1PIIPIG COMMISSIOhI
ATTEST:
~,G,t rr~ `~ ~;l-G-i~t.u:~.,
SECR[TA, Y, AIJAHE IM C ITY PLAWPIItJG COMPtISS 14tJ
STATE OF CAL ~ FORtJ IA )
COUNTY OF ORA~dGE ) ss.
C ITY OF ANAfiE IM )
1, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Plannin~ Cor~mission, do
hereby certi fy that tt~e foregoing resolution ~~ias passed and a~lcpted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on June 1, 1°31, hy thz folloaiing voee of
the memhers thereof:
AYE$; C~MMISSIOtiERS: E.~ftNFS, ROII~S, ^uUSf1~Rf., FRY, FIEP,f?ST, iCl~l~, TOLAR
~JOES: C0~INISSIOhlE°5: MOHE
A6SEMT: CDMHISSIOtJERS: NOhlE
IPI 1JIT~JESS WHE°EOF, I have hereunte set mv hand this lst ~fay of June, 3'~81.
~ ~ J
~ /~ i r~ _7 ~IR..t .+ ~
SECRE.TAkY, At!AHE1~1 CITY PLANNIPIf, COM.MISSIOM
-3- PC81-123