PC 81-127RFSOLUTIO~! '10, ?C~1--127
A P.ESOLUTIO~! OF T~IE AtJAH[I`1 CITY P;.Atl~~ItIG C~~~~115~i~tl
R~CO!1MF~1DItJG TQ TfIE f.ITY COI1~lCll THAT TIfE ACCESS P01"!TS
?0 S~1F1TA AP~A CA"1Y0~! R~AD l1S I~1DICnTE~ OH EY,HI~IT P;~, 7,
GY CITY COU'ICIL RCSOLUTIO': ~:0. ~(,•R-27 6E REVI~E~ T~ I'ICLI!~F
A~! FlCGf 55 P01 i!T ~ES I G'JATED AS ~~~ , AS SH01•1~1 Ofl EXF~ I P IT A
WhIE°E~S, t'~e prnpcrty o~-rrn~r has reque,t~d th~ CiT.y Planning CoMmission to
consirier access onto Santa Ana ~anyon P,oad for a ~~,( acre ,r.r~~osed commerci~l center
located on the south~•test corner of Santa Ana Canyon P,o3d an~1 Fairmont Roul~vard, said
aceess proposed approxi7ateiy 44? r'eet ~~~st of the cen[erline oT Fairmont P,oulevard;
and
k'hIEREAS, tne City Planning Corrnissior. did hold a ouhlic hearina at rhe Civic
Cent~r, in the City of Anahein on April 20, 1^n,l, at 1:3~ r.n., notir_e -,f said pub)ic
hearing havin9 6een duly given as reauired t~y lai~ and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1''.~;, to '~Par and consider
evidence for and against said pro~osed revision oF access ~~ints on Santa Ana Canyan
Road, in connection the;r~;~ith; and said he.ring ~-~as continueci t~ *he meetinq of June
1;. j~^j~ ,7ni
1J11ERE.45, said Commission, .~fter d~e inspection, investig~ti~n anrl study maje
oy 'ts~alf ~3nd in its hehalf, and ar*er due consideration of all evi~ir~nce and reports
G`fer~~ci at said heirinr,, d~es finri ~nd deternine the folloa~inn facts:
1, That it is dezn~cd aopr~priate and nr:.cessarv to imnrove access and
circulation in the stud;~ area and, more snecificall~, the south~•rest cnrner of Santa
Ana Canyon Road and Fairmon[ 3oulevard, because ~f futur~ ~~tential access problens
as ~ddirional devel~nment ~eciirs in ttie suF~i~cf ~rra.
2, That the Santa Ana Canyon Road ~ccess Point Study, as ado~ted by the
City~ Cuunty and State, designates limi:ed a~pro~~ed access pnints (il) along Santa
Ana Can;~an Road, said access points i•rere 7dO~~tP.C~ as a lonlcal method of providing
access to those properti~s fronting on Santa Ana Canyon P,oad at suc!~ t(r^e as sald
Ptoperties were to be devclopec for uses more intense were presently zoned,
Subseq~ent to approval, four revisiors Ga, ~a, 5a and l~a have occure~l,
3, That the Santa .4na Canyon ?oad Aecess Point Study foun~i that at sucFi
time as property o~:m ers choose [o develop their properties, they ~~~ould have the
responsibility of jointly solvinq their mutual circulation ~roblems sc+ as to conform
to Lhe prnposed ac~ess peints to Santa Ana Canyor r.oad.
4. That th€~ Circulation Element of the Anahe~m General Plan desiqnates
Santa Ana Canyon ,:oad from Cerro Vista Drive to Weir Canyon Road as a Seenle
EYPr'essway ~•~iCh •~ccess limited to those points as defined tiv the access point sTudy.
5, That anproxir~at~lv t.^.n (1~) nr~perty o~mrrs a~ne•~r:ci at s~id nublic
hearings in oppos(tion and a netition siGned f:y ao~roximitely one hundred, seventy-
~even (l/%) area property rn.mers ~•~as received in ~nposition.
I~pt,r, TI!EREFn':E~ fiF IT RESn~~'F~ TH.4T the AnaFeir~ Cit•,~ Plannin9 C~nr~tss:on has
revie+aed the proposal to construct access onto Santa Ana Canyon Road as a oart of ~n
overall access plan for ~ prop~se~l shonninn center on a F.~ acre narcel loc,ated c,n
PC81-127
thP south~•~est corner of Sarta ,4na Canyon Road and ~airmont "uulevard sai~l access to
be 1oe~ted approximately ~i4~ fect vrest of t~~e centerline of Fairmont ~oulevard; an~1
dces hereby aoprovc the Ilegative Decl3ratior. from t:he requirement to prepare an
environmrntal impact report on thr_ basis that there Y,ould be no si~nificant
individual or cumulative adverse environinental imnact due to the a~proval of this
"Jeg:tive Declarati~n; that no sensitive environment.~l i~^acts are involved in the
pro(~osal; that [he Initial Study suhmitted hy the petitioncr indicates n~ sianifieant
individual or cumulativ~ arive~rse env?r~nhental imnacts; and that the Plegative
D~_ti~ra[(~n substantiatin~ the foreg~ing `in:lin~s is or file in the City of Anaheim
Plannirg Department.
GE IT FURTHER RFSC_UFD that the Anaheim ;i*_v Pl:~nninn Conr~ission ~1oes herehy
reconm~nd t~ rhe City f.c~uncil ~~ the ~ity ~f „naheim a~l~nticn of the ~rr~posed
revision [o Exhibit ~~o. 7, adonted in c~nnectio~~,-,ith Sant~ Ana Canvon Boai Access
Points study, as sho~•m ?b on Exnihit A.
1. That an access point ne perc,itted apnrnximately !~f~~ feet west of the
centerline of Fairnount E3oulevard consistinn o~ a 1^-`n~t ~•iide, ~:S-foot long
deceleration lane for easthound traffic enterin~ the nropos~d certer and an 19-fo~t
WI(~@ right turn only `or traffic exitina the center.
2. Tha[ a traffic signal should he installed at Fairnont "oulevard and
Santa Ana Canyon Road a.,d [hat the property orm er shall c~ntrihutr ~, min(mum of
$2>,0~0 to~•~ards the cost of a traffic sianal.
3. That the exisYing openin~ 1n [he 1,~ndscaped ^~e~lian on Santa Ana Canyon
Road providing access to che nrop,<rty located immed(ately to the west shall he
closed.
~+. That the nrc,nosPd hicvclP ir,n.~ ah:,tt ti,. r~l~~.,~~,+ ~,. F.,ii,,,., ~ti.
proposed sidewalk onto the suhject pr •ty and sh~il n~t cross the access lane,
except at a designated crossoralk,
5. That ttie proposed equestrian trail shall he located on thP north side
of Rio Grande Drlve and the ~•~est side of Fairr~ont Bou'evard; also prov(~iira a trail
easemen[ 4~hich traverses the north~~~est boundary along the 5~1~11 Cznal which is
necessary `or connection to the Santa Ana Canyon trail extending from the west; that
the oamer(s) of subject property de_dicate ~n~i im~rove the eauestrian and hi;<inq
t~ails in accordance ~•~ith standard plans and specific~Cions on file in the office of
the City Enginecr; and that the rid?ng and hikinq trall remain adjacent to Santa Ana
Canyon Road, if the r^questr_d access onto Santa Ana Canyon R~a~1 is denied.
G. That pr;or to issuance of a buildin~ nermit, the doveloper shall submit
specific circuiatlun plans to the Traffic En~ineer for app m val.
7. That prior to ti~e (ssuanc~ of a hull~inn permit, thr• devcioper shall
submit specif;c p1,~ns to [hc P)~nnin_y Ccmr^ission for appr~val.
~~. That t'~e nei~ access point :~e ciesinn~te~l as ^h on tbe Santa Ana Cam~on
Access Point,, Study, as indicateJ on txhiblt A. ~
B[ IT rURTNER RF.SOL~~E~ t!,at t`~e Anaheim fitv Pianninct Co:^n(ssion does h~reby
find and de[ermine that th2 adontion of th~s Resoiution Is ex.prPSSly predicated uoon
-'- PCBt-~27
~pplicant's cempliance o-~ith each and all of the conditions hereinabcve set forth.
Should any condition or any part thereof, be ~eclared invalid or unenforceable by the
final judgment of any court of conpetent _jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any
approvals lierein contained, shall be deemed null and votd.
1931
THE FOR~G01~lG RCSOLUTIOh! is signed and approved by me this 1~th day af June,
~~~-~~a G~ . 1~~~~--~_
CfiA I RMFlN PRO 7EMPORE
ANAHEIM CITY PLA~dtJiNG COM!11S510N
ATTEST:
~~ ~° ~~.~:~..
SECfiETARY, ANAHE 1 M C I TY P!.A.tdN I MG CONN I SS I OPI
STATE OF CALIFORNIFl )
COUMTY OF ORADJGE ) ss.
CITY OF AIJAH'cIM )
I, Edith L, Harris, Sc~retary of the Anaheim Cit~ Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregcing resolution o~as passed and adopted at a meetinq of
the Anahetm Cit;~ Planning Commission held on June 15, 1~1`3i, at 1:30 p.m., by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARWES BOUAS, HERRST, Y.I~;G
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BUShORE, FRY
A~SENT: COMMISSIO!dERS: TOLAR
IPI WITtICSS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of June, iQQI,
~~~ ~ ~~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM C1TY PLAPIPIING COMMISSIOM
-3- PC81-127