PC 81-129r,~so~uTio~~ no. r~c~i-i29
A RESOLUTI01; OF TII[ A~I/111EIH CITY PLAtlII!I1G COh1111SSI0t!
TH/`,T PCTITIOI! FOR C0~lDITIOllP~L USE rrr,riir tl0. ?217 (3E GFA;ITED, ItJ PART
WfIERE/15, the ~naheim Cit•• Pl~nning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from SPE[CII AIID LAl1GU/IG[ DEVELOPII[~!T CE~IT[R
IIIC., c/o I~largret 41ati:ins, lJ. ;i. Daum ancl Staff, 14;1 Quail Street, PJea~port
l3each, Cai i fornia, 92i,G0, a~~ner, and OSC/1R [. bltIITED00K, P, 0, Cox 3i4, Yorba
Linda, California ~2CoG, a,ent, of cert~in rr_al pro~crty situatcd in the City of
Anaheim, County of Oranae, State of Californi~, descrihed as:
TIIE [/1ST 151.7.~ FEET OF TfIE SOUTfiEAST OU/1RTER OF TIIE ~IOP,TtitlEST
QUARTER OF TII[ NORTIIldEST QU/1RTER OF SEC?IOI7 1(~, TOLlPISIIIP h SOUTN,
RAt1GE 10 41EST, It! TI{E RA~1CH0 SAiJ JUAIJ C/1.i0fJ DF S/INTA AElA, AtJD
(3EING A PORTIOP! OF LOT G OF fiELEIJ A~JD LYNChI'S .4DDITIOt! TO AIJAIIElt1,
AS PER M~P THEREOF, R[CORD[D lil E001: i+42, PAGE 1;£~, UEGDS, II9 THE
OFFI CE OF TIIE COUtlTY FECORDER OF LOS A!lGELES COU~lTY. E:(CEPTIIdG
THEREFR0~9 TIIE SOUTFI 3o1f.13 FEE7 0~ SAI~ LAtJD. ALSO EXCEPTIIlf
TIfE~EFROti TIIE IlORTII 195.00 FEET OF ifiE REHAIPIDER OF Sf11D LA`!D.
S~ID L/1tJD IS AL50 SIiOWtI 0~~ ~ F!/1P OF SURVEl' FILED It! BOOK ?_8, P(1(;E
3, ?ECORDS OF SURVEYS, I ~l TfiE OFFI CE OF THE COUtITY RECn~;DE~ OF
SnID COU~;TY.
4111[R[,15, the City Plannin~ Corimission diJ schcd~lc a public hea~ing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheiri on ~tay 1~^, 1~E1, at ~:3n p.m., notice of said public
hearing haviny been duly ~iv~n as required by laa! and in accordance ~~~ith the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1F,'>>, to hear and consider
evidence for an~ against said proposed conditional use permit and to i~rvestigate and
make findings and recomr:iendations in conr.ection thereo-ri[h; said pubiic hcaring having
been continued to the Planning Cocuoission mectinq of June 15, 1981; and
WIIEREAS, said Cornmission after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, ancl after due consideration of all evidence and renorts
ui(ereu a~ saiu nearing, does tind and determinc the folloe~ing facts:
i. That the proposed use is properiy one for ti•~hich a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheiro Plunicipal Code Sectior 1".(1.050.070 to vtit: Tc
permit an automobile storage facility with a~aivers of [he follot•ring:
(a) S[CTIO~J 18.61.062.Q11 - hlaximum structural height.
0 feet permitted; 20 feet proposed)
(b) SFCTIOtJ 13.G1.0G3.020 - t1inimum sideyard setback.
,20 feet required; none proposed)
(c) SECTIOtI lu.G1.OG3.020 - Re uired site screeninq.
-foot higli block wall adjacent to
residentia' zone boundary required;
chainlin~: ence laith redr~ood siats
proposed
PC81-129
Z. That the ~,ro~osed use consi>tinq of an irn~ound yard for fi~ie (5) ears
is hereby granLed for ~ period of one (1) year >ubject L'o revie~.~ upon ~~ritt:en request
from the petitiuner tc~ ~Jeterriin~ ~~~hether or noC the use has cre~ted a parl;'ng ~;;oblem
in L'he area an~l if any adverse iei~~ac[s have been created in t!ie adj~cent school and
residential areas. IY aclditional and acceptable parkinq is ma~1e available to subject
property, up to ten (1~) cars r~ay be storecl at this iocatien.
3. That thc F~mposed use is herehy qr~ntecl a~ith six (6) parl:ing spaces
being cJesign~ted for the pro~csed industrial buil~ling ~•;hich ~•~ill be used for an
office, an asserblin~ operation and ~ ~•iarehnuse, and ~;~ith a maxinum c,f five (5)
parking spaces being utilized for tiie storan~ of repossessecl automobiles. !f the
petitioner subriits an executed anci acceptable parl:in~ a~reement to the City
Attorney's Office for approval, said a,reenent ~ermiting employee parking on the
adiacent residential prope:rty immediately to the south, the number o~= impounded
vefiicles may be increased to a maximum of ten (10),
4. That the re~uested ~•raivers (a) ard (b) are hereby granted on the basis
that d~nial ~~~ould deprive subject pro~erty or a privilegc enjoyed 'oy other properties
in the same zone and vicinity and that adjacent property te the south and wesr is
developed with a publit school altho~~qn the zoning is residential.
5. Tliat thc requested waivcr (c) is hcreby denied on the basis thaC the
petitioner stipulated at the pubiic hearin~ of Hay 7E to retain the exi,ting 6-`oot
h+c7h i,iasonry block ~~ral1 adjacent to ti~e sin~le-fami ly residential ~ore to the north
of subject propcrty.
~. That the pro~~osed use is hereh/ ~ranted subjert to the revised pian
relocaCing the proposed ~ate a minimum of twenty-five (25) `eet from the f ront
property line alony Loara Street.
7. That the proposed usc is hereby 9rantcd subject to the petitioner's
sti~ulation to Cerminate all e;<istinn conditional use permits and variances on
sub_iect nr~ncrr"
$. Th~t the ~roposea use, as grarted, ~-~i11 n~t adversely affect thc
adjoining land uses and the gro~.ath and development of the area in ~yhich it is
praposed t~ be iocateci.
9. That the s i ze anci sl~ape of the s i tE: p roposed for the use, as grantNd,
is adequate to allo~•r the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular arca nor to thc pcace, health, safety, and general
weifare of thc Ci;izens of tiie City of Anaheim.
1~• That tiie granting o` Y.he Conditional Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, will rot be dctrimental to the peace, neaith, safety ~nd general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of F~naneim.
11. That thc traffic ~crereit~.d by the proposed usc, as granted, wi11 not
impose an undue burden uron Che streets ~incl hi~~ha~ays d~~signeci and irmroved to carry
the traffic in the area.
-2- PC81-129
~ ~ _ _,
12. Thot onc person indicated t:hcir ~rc;cncc at >aid ~1ay 1~", 19111, public
hearing in opposition; anJ that no correspondence ~~iis receive~i in oppesiCion to the
subject petiti~~n,
EiNiRO~!hIFfIT/1L IIIPACT FIIIDI~JG; That the ~naheir City P)~~nning Commission has
revieo~ecl the proposal to permi± an ~utoi.;ob i le stora~c faci 1 i ty vii th waivers of
maximu~n structural heiglit, r,iinimuri sidcyard setbacl: and required site screer~ing on a
reetanyularly-shaped parcel of land consistin~ of ap~ror,imately 0,2 acre, havin9 a
frontage of approximatr.ly 72 f~et on the ~~.est side of Loara Street (13!; South Loara
Street); and does hereby approve thc ile~ative Declaratinn from the requirement to
prepare an envirc~nment~~l ir~pact report on the basis th~t ther~ would be no
significant individual er cumulativ~ ~dverse environmental impact due to the approval
of this tJegative Ueclar~tion since the Anahein General Plan designates *_he subject
property for mediurr density residenti~~l land uses corunensurate with the proposal;
that no sensitivic environmental impact=_ are invoived in the proposai; that the
Initial Study submittcd by the petitioncr indicates nn significan*_ individual or
cumulative adverse environnentai impacts; and that the Negative Declaration
substantiatirg Che foregoing findin~s is on filc in thc City of Anaheim Planning
Departnent.
t~OSI, TIIEREFOf'[, QE IT P,ESOLVED that thc Anancici City Planning Comnission
does hereby grant subject Petitior for Conditional Use Permit, upon the folluwing
conditions which are hereby founJ to be a necessary prerenuisite to the proposed use
of the subject propcrty in ord~r to presr_rve th~ safety and general ~•~elfare of the
Citizens of thc City of Anaheim:
~• Thit this Conditional Use Fermit is grantecl subject to the compietion
of Reclassification I:o. £;~-3t-3G, r,a,~ pendinq.
Z. That subject p mperty sh~ll be developed substantially in accordance
w~th plans and specifications on file ~•iith the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Plos. 1
and 2, Revision No. 1.
~• iiia~ Lonaition ~~o, Z, ~hove-mentioned, shall be conplied ~vith prior to
final building and zoning ins~~ctions.
4• That thc use is hereby ~ranteJ `or a period of onc ye~r subject to
review upon written request from the petition~r to uetermine ~~~hether or not Che use
has created a parking problem in the area and if there have been any adverse im~acts
on the adjacent school anci residential areas.
BE IT rIlRTIIER RESOLVED that the Ar.ah~im City Pianning Commission does hereby
find and detcrmine that the adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compiiance ivith each and ail of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Shouid any condition or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the
final judgr,ient of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any
approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
TIIE FOREGOING RESOLUTIO;! is si~nccl ~nd a~preved by me this 1!;th day of June,
1~"ul.
l';. ,~~ ~~~- ~, ~
,'.~R~~~~ I~ . ~~
~.1C_." o- `~-. S~_
CfIAi R!illtl PR~ 7Ef'PORC
AI~AIiEIM CI7Y PLAil~lftlG COMMlSSIO!!
~3 PC81-12y
ATTEST:
(~ ~ .l~ ~'.' ~ '
t~.
SECRETARY, A,JANEIPi CITY PLAtdNIIIG COMMISSION
ST/1TE ~F CALI FOR~II/1 )
COUIJTY OF ORnlIG[ ) ss.
CITY OF AIlAflEltl )
I, Edith L. Narris, Secretary of t~ic Anaheim City Planning Conmission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution v~as passed and auopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commissi~n held on June 15, 1~31, at 1:3~ p.m., by the
following vote of the members tlicreof:
AYES: C011MISSIONEKS: LiARIlES, [30UhS, QUSHO;[, FP,Y, HCRu~T, t:IliG
NQES: CON~~1iSS10~1[ftS: ~lO;JE
A[3SEIlT: C011t11SS10(lERS: TOL/1R
111 411TIi[SS 4JIIEREOF, I have here~n set my hand this 1;th day of June, 1931,
~ ~~~~n t ~
SECRETA?Y, ~tIAIIEIN CITY f'l.F1Nt~ltlG COMMISSIO!!
I
-4- PC81-129