PC 81-150i;rsoi_~~~ io~i ;:o. Pcs'.i-,5~
~ R[SOLI!TfOtl OF TI!F n!1hHEl~! CITY PL~~J"It~l~ C~'!!~I~SIn~i
TiiAT °ETITION F~R R[CL!`,SSIFICC~TI(?'! ";~. ~3~-3?-!:~ [3E G~11!1TF~,
llHEREAS, t`ie ~1nahein City Planninc, Cornission did recciv^ a verifier;
~et i t ion i'or Rec lass i f i cat ion f ron LES~:Y DF.VF! f?P~?Ft!T C(1. , P, 0. Box 5~2 ~, 310~
Wilshire 6oulevard, 8ever)y I;ills, California ~~21~, o~-mer, and GEORf,E A. LPS~Y, VICE
PRESIDE'JT, CDATS b tlALL.1CE DCVELOFPI~~JT CO., Itl~,, ~~71 Slater Avenue, Suite 240,
Hu~tington Beach, California ~32~i1f7, agent, of certain real prooerty situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orarsge, State of California, ciescrtbed as:
The tJorth li-4 fAet of the South 323 feet of the Northeast quarter
of [he Mortheast quartcr of the Northeast quarter of Section 2~i,
Tormship ~E South, Range il 'dest, in th~~ Rancho Los CoyoCes, in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Cali`ornla, as per map
ra_cordr~d in ~o~l< 51, Paoe il of Miscelianeous Maps in the office
of tne County Recorder of said County. EXCEFT the ':lest 132 feet
tiiereof.
WHEREIIS, t7e i,ity Planning Conmission ~iid hold a auhlic hr.arino at the Civic
Center ir~ the City of Anahcim or~ July 13, 1'~~t, at 1:3^ n.r., noticr_ of said public
hearing having been duly qiven as requir~d by la~•~ anci in accord~nce arith t'ie
provisinns of the Anaheim Hunicipal Code, C~a~ter 1'.'!3, to hcar and consider
evidence For and against said proposed ~nrlnac.jfi~~r~~~ ~-;r+, ";,-,vr;tiqate and make
flndings and recommendations i~ connection ther~~•~ith; an~l
WNEREAS, sald Commission, after duc insoection, investi9aiion and study made
by itself a~d in its hehalf, and after dun considr.rati~~n of a11 evirfence and reports
(~ffnrr~l :7~ c~ir1 I~n~ri ~in..r. f7n-1 .,a .I.,f-. ..t... C..,~i.' c'_
~ _ , . . ... _.,.. ... __.. .. _ . ... , .. ~,..., ':~ ~ ~,..~~.
1 That the petitioner proposes r~classification of subiect property from
the RS-A-43,'100 (Residential/Agricultural) Zone [o the RN-3~On {Residential,
Multiplc-Far~ily) Zone.
2. That the Anahein General Plan d~signates suhj~ct oropPrty for medium
density residential. and general commercial land uses.
3. l:,at the proposed reclassification of subject pronerty is necessary
and/or desirablc for the orderly and proper developraent of the comriun?tv.
4. That the proposed reclassfficatlon of subject property does prop~rly
rela[e to the zones and their permittrd uses locall;~ estahlished in close proximity
to subject propt,rty and to the zon~s and the~r permitted uses 9enerolty establ(shed
ti,roughout the corrrnunity.
5. That the preposed reclassi`(cation oF ~uhi~ct proo~rty requires th~
dedication ~ind imr.rovement of ahu[tine str~~c•cs in acc~~~lanr.~ a:ith *~~ Circulation
Pf.~1-150
El~.ment of tne Gener~l pl~n, due to the nnticin~tec; increa;e in traff~e 4ihieh ~•~ill bc
generated ~y thc inten~i~`ic~tion of lnnd usc.
~. Tnat no ~ne indicated their ~rr.sencc at sa;d public hearing in
oppos(tion; and that no correspondcnc~ t:~a; rcr_~i~i~~ in ~pp~si inn to the subjer.t
pe[ition.
E'~VIRONfiEt1Tl11. I'iPACT FI!ln~;l~: T~~~ t~e .4natieim City Planning Commission has
revie«~ed the p~opo,~~ to r~~~issify suhjec[ prnperty ~ron the °S-A-4
(RESI~ENTI~VAGRICIJLTU3AL) ZOIIE to the R!~-3~~p (nESIDE~!TIAL, !ii 3'~~~
construct a 25-lot, Zli-unit condoninium suhdivision ~•~it'i aniversPLufFArequ(red'JFio~t
frontage and mininum landsca~ed setback on a rectangularly-shaped oarcel of land
consisting of approximately 1.~5 acres, havin~~ a frontage of anproximately i(4 feet on
the arest sidc of Magnolia ,4vr_nue, approxinate~y ;l,n fe~t south of the centerline of
Ball Road; and does hereby approve th~ Negative Declaration fron the re4uirement to
prepare an envir~nmental imnac[ report on the hasis that there would be no
significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental innact due to the approval
of th(s ~tegative Declaration since the Anaheim General Pla~ designates the subject
?roperty for general corrnerc(al and rnPdium-density land uses commensuratv wf*h th~
proposal; tiiat no sensirjy~ ~.~,;i.;;~-~rntal ir,~nacts are involved in the proposal; that
the Initial Study subnitted by t!ie petitioner indicates no signiricant individual or
eumu~ative adverse ~-nvironnental imnacts; and that [he Neaatfve Declaration
substantiatin, thc foregoing findings is on file in the Citv of Ananeim P)annfng
~epartment. '
~~~~J, TfiE~EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED chat [he Anaheim i:ity Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition fo~ Reclassification and, by so doing, that Tftle
13-Zon(ng of the Anaheim Municioa) Code be amended to exclude the above-described
property fron the RS-A-43,000 (R[SI'~;-;1TIAi/nr,p~rniT,;~~~~ ,
~~
"~`~;`~ ~ N~un~~-ty into the RM-12~0 ~ `~ "'.` d1U «~ incorporate said
following conditions which are hereby foundctoDhe+T~3F~Lnecessa~LE-FAMILy) ZOp;E upon th~
proposed use of suhject property in order to preservA th~ s~fetPran~l~uisite to the
of the Citizens cf the City of Analicim; Y general ~•~elfare
~ That an ordinanc~ reronin~ t'~e sut~ject prnperty shali in no event
become effectfve exce~t upon or fo~)oi.~~~9 tliA recorciation of Final Tr~;ct Nap No.
1156L~ ~vithin the time specified In Governnent Code Section ~•L4,53,5 or such further
tine as the advisory agency or C1ty Council may ~rant.
2. That the o•Nner(s) of suhject pro~ert,• ~h~ll deed to the City of Anaheim
a strir or land 53 feet in ~~icith frnc; the centerlinn of the street aionq ~Magnolia
~venue for stree[ ~•~idening purposes.
3. That all engincerfnr, ;,~q~~r,,n;ents of the City of Anaheim along Magnolia
~lvenue includinr, pr,~par~~tion of ir~nrovement plans and installation of all
improvements suc'~ as curf~s ar,d ~u[ters, si~1~~•r~li:s, s[rPe[ nradinn ancl pavinn,
drainage facilitics or o~I,,,r appurterint ~:orl, s,~; )1 h~. ~nr;~~I^,1 t•~ith as reuuired b
Ch~ City En~ineer ind in accordance ~•ri[h saeciFicitions on file in the ~`fice of the
City En~~inccr; ~n~t ;trcci ligi,iinq f~~Ilitie~s alon~ Magnolla Aveni;e sha11 be
installed as requirec! by the Office of Utilitfes Gener~l "tanac~er, and in aceordanee
-2- PC31-150
with specifications on file in the Uffice of l;tilities ~enerai Manag~r; and/~r that a
bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credtt, ar cash, in an amount and form
satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the C'ty to guarantee the
installation of the a,.~ove-mentioned requirements prlor to occupancy.
4, Prior to issuance of building permits, the ~pplicant shall present
evidence satisfactory to the Chief Building Inspector that the units ~+~ill be in
conformance with Noise Insulatien Sta~dards specified in the California
Administrative Code, Title 25.
5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall present
evidence satisfactory to the Chief Building inspector that the proposed project is in
conformance a~ith Council Policy Numher 542, Sound Attenuation in Residential
Projects.
6, inat subject property stiall be developed suhstantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on ftle aiitli the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1
throu~h 5.
7. Prior to the introduction or an ordinance rezoning subject prof~erty,
Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 3, ahove-mentioned, shall he completed. The provisions or
rights aranted by thls resolution shall becone null and vold by action of tl~e
Planning Commission unless said conditions are compiied with ~~rithin one year from the
date hereof, or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant.
8, That Condition Plo. 6, above-menttoned, shall b~ complied o-~ith priur to
final building and zoning inspectior,s.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that tl~e Anaheim Citv Plan~in~ Commtssion ~oes hereby
find and determTne that adoption of this P,esolution is e~nressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be deciarEd invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOI~IG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by ~e this 13th dav of July,
1981. .
~~ ~ ~ ~.
CHAIRMAN, APlAHEIM CITY PLANNING CONP~ISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~ ~ /
SECRETARY, AtdAHEIM CITY LANNING COMMISSIO~!
-3- PC8t-15o
STATE OF C~~L I FORPI IA )
COUNTY OF ORAPJGE ) ~s.
CITI' OF AtJAH[IM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the .4naheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the fore9oing resolutian was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held o~ July 13, 1481, by the folloa~ing vote of
tha members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIOPfEP,S: QARPIES, BOUFlS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, KiNf;
NOES; COP1111SSIONERS: PlOIJE
ABSE.NT: COMMISSIOt•IERS: TOLAR
ID! WIT~lESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of July, 1Q41.
~~ ~ ~.,~,
SECRE7ARY, ANAHEIPI CITY PLANNIPl~ COMMISSION
-/#- PC31-150