PC 81-153^ESOLUTI~t! ~d0. PCIII-1;3
A R[50~.!1TIOPi OF TfiE A~IANEi~1 CITY PL~tI^ll!lr. ~nH~~ISS1~~1
TI1AT PFTiT10~1 FOf? COtlDITIO!7/1L USF. PER'11T ~JO. 22',? BF GRANTED
WHEP,E~S, th~ Anaheim City Pianning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Corditional Use Permit from Dn~~~L~ R. CURCIE, ET AL, 1301 North
Jefferson, Anaheim, Ca1Pf~~rnia 92~~7, o~aners, and 41ESTFP,t1 EX?ERMI~JATItlG CO!1PANY, 1321
~lorth Jefferson, Anaheim, Calirornia 978Qj, agent, of ccrtain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State ~T Cali`ornia, descrihed as:
That portion of lot ~:2 of Flazard's Suhdivision, in the City of
Anaheim, as sho~rn on licensed surveyor's map filed in bool; l, page
26 of Record of Surveys, in the office of the recorder of said
county, describ~d as: Parcei 1, as shoam on a Parce' Map filed in
E3ook 117, page 47 of Parc~i 11a~+s in the office of the County
Recorder of Orange County.
l'HEi;EAS, *.he City P1~nnfnq Con~mission did hold a puhlic hearing at the Civic
Cente~ in the City of Anaheim on July 13, 1~;1, at 1:3~ p.m., notice of said publqc
hearing having been duly 9lven as required by 1a~~ and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter i".n3, to hear anci cansider
evidence for and against said proposed condit+onal use pcrnit an~l to ir,vestigate and
rr~ake findings and r~ccm;mendations in cnnnection there~~~ith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investiqation and study made
by itself and in its hehalf, and after due consideration of ill evidence and reports
offered at said hearin~i, does fin~i an~i d~rPrmr~., ~ti„ r„i,,,...c__ ~__,. .
1. That the proposed use is properly one for ~•ihich a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 1~'~,~:1,~5~,(-,~F to wit: to
retain an existing exterminatin; service in rhe !1L (Industri~l, Limited) Zone.
2. 'ihat the proposed use is hereby granted subject to the petitioner's
stipulation tliat the storage of all chemicals and all over-night storage of vehicles
shall be wholly inside the huildinn.
3. That the oroposed use ~~~ill not adversely affect the adjoini~9 land uses
and t~~e growth and development of the area in iahich it is preposed to be located,
4. That the siz~ and shape of tne site proposed for the use is ade~uate to
allow thr fuil development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to ;he peace, her•irn, safet•r, and qen~ra~ ~•~elfare of the ~itizens
of the City of Anahefm,
`:. That the grantinq of the Condi[ion,~i ilse Pernit under thr_ cunditions
imposeel, if any, a~i 11 not :,e detrimental to tl~e pc~ace, health, safety anrl ~eneral
::ci;are of the C%tizens of thc Clty of Anahefm,
PC81-t>3
G. That tlic trnffic gcnernted by tl~e pronose~; usc ~~i 11 not inpose an undue
burden upon the st~eets ~nd high~.•:ays ~'esic~nerf ~~nr; im~rnv~•d t~ c~rry th~ traffie in
the arca.
%. That no one in%lieated their nresenc.~ :~r. said publie hearing in
opposition; and tha*. no correspondence ~;~o; rr_ceived in ~~p~sition to the suhject
petition.
E!dVIR~N.^tEr1TAL IHPACT FI~J~I"1G: The Plannin9 D•,recter or his autharized
representativc has d~termined that the proposed prcject f,-~lls ~~~ithin the definitiort
of Categorical E:cemptions, Class 1, as dcfined in Che State EI? ~:,uidelines and is,
therefore, cate9or'cally er.empt frcn the requirern~nt to prepare an E!°,
NO~d, THEREF~RE, BE IT RESULVE? that the Anaheim Citv Planring Co~nmission
does hereby grant: subject Petition for Conditional Use Perciit, upon th~ fol:oti~ring
conditions o-rhich are herehy found to he a r,ecessary prereauisit~ to the proposed use
of [he subject property in order to preserve t'~e safety ar.d ~enerni ~•~elfare of the
Citizens of the Ci*yo u` Anaheim:
1, Thet the o~,•rner(s} of su!:ject property s~iall pay the difference between
the industrial arid cor.~riercial traffic si9nal :~ssessnen[ fees (,~rdinance ?!o. 3~39~) in
an amount as de[crnined by t'~e City Council, :iithin a neriorl of sir.ty (~~1) days from
thc date hereo`.
2. That subject prr,nerty shall he develoned sub=tantiaily in accordance
vilth plans and specifi~at?ons on file ~,ith the City of Anahein markerl Exhiblt ~los. 1
and Z.
BE IT FURTIIE^ P,ESOLVED tnat the Anaheim City Planninq Commission does hereby
find and determine that aioption of this Resoluti~n is expressly ore~iicated upon
..t i,- _,
~rr"~-`~'•~ - ~-~~r~~~~~ •- ~•~~~~ ~-~~-~, ~f~u .:ii ~ i.iir. i.U~luiLiUltS ilCl'einilDOV@ SCt TOfCh.
Should any such condi[ion, or any part therecf, ne decl~red invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any c~urt of comoetent jurisdiction, then this ('.esolution,
and any approvals herein cont:ained, shall 6e deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOIhif, RE:OLUTIO`: is signed and a~proved by ne this 13th day of July,
1g81.
ATTEST•
~ .ti-,--,-m-~~- ~ .~ ,a.o.~,,.s ~
CIi~IRNA"t, A~lAHEI!t CITY PLAP~~!ir~r; CO~iM155lON
- ~~ -~ 7~.~ :_.~
SECRETARY. ANANEIM C11"Y PLA~1N1~lr, COMNISSIO~!
-~- PC81-1~3
STATE GF CALlFORIJIA )
COUNTY OF ORFl~IGE ) ss.
C ITY OF AHIINF IN )
I, Edith L. Ilarris, Secretary of the Anahnim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that *_he foregoin9 resolution i~,as passed and arlopted at a meeting of
the Anahcin. City Plannin9 C.ommission held on July 13, 1°"1, hY the follo~•~inq vute of
the members thereof: ~
AY~S: C011"115510PIFP,S: DARt1~S, GOUAS, 3USI10P,E, F°Y, NER:'.ST, I(INr.
~OES: COP1,MlSS(O~IEP.S: NO~It
.1CS[.'!T: CONMIS510~IERS: TOL.A!?
II! 4lITtJ[SS ~'HEREOF, I have hereunto s~*_ my hand this 13rF day of July, i981.
~~'~ ~ ~1~,.~.
SECRETPIRY, A~!;1HE I'! C ITY PLANP!I PIG COM!11 SS IO~J
-3- P(:£i1-153