PC 81-183RESOLUTIO'! 'I~. PCS1-1:;~?
A RESOLUTI~'I OF TtiE A~;i1HEl!1 CITY PLl:'1!!i'I~ C~'~~!ISSI~!I
THAT PETITIO~! F(1' CONDITIO'IAL I~SE PC!?N1- 'I~, 221~^ CE GR!!'~TF`), II: Pl1pT
WFIEF,EAS, thc A.nancim City Planninri Cumroission di~i receive a verified
Petiticn for Ccnditional Use Permit from ~L(~RIl~ RO',JE, 1~11 CI iff Crive, Ne~iport
Beach, Cal i fornia, ~2 i~5;, o~~iner, and ~l1VID 5. C~LLINS, 1~77 l•lest aal l Road, Anaheim,
California '~2~02, a9ent, of certain r~a) nr~perty si[u~ted in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, SCatc of California, Jescribed as:
PARCEL t, Itl THE CITY OF ANAHEI"1, CQl'~lTY l1F 0^A'IGE, STATE OF
LALIFOP.NI{'i, AS St10;!'r! bti A PARCEL "•AP FILED I.'J BOnt; 1lln PF~~ES 1?_
AND 73 OF PARCEL MP,"r$, I"! ThiE OFFICE OF T!iE COII~ITY RECQR~ER OF
SAID COUtITY, and
That eertain parcei of land lyirg ~:~~t~~in ~ nortion of Parcel 2, as
sho~.yn on a nap reeorded in °oo.~ i~E^~, oaae 1?, Pareel Maps, Records
oF said Orange County, descrihecl ~s f~llo~•;s: E?e~~nnina at the
nost north~resterly corner of said °arcPl 2, ns sha~m on sair)
parcel map; thencc '1 53° 2;' 3~" t, 1, ^' feet; thence 5 3~0
31'22" E, 1~:,^.`1j feet to ttie beginninq nf a tan~ent c~irve concav~
north~•~esterly and having a radius of ?j,4^ feet; th~nce SouthCrl)•
and So~~thiiesterly alonq said curve tLrough a central f3f1C~n ~f °"~~
00' ~0'' an arc distanee of 3?.^7 feet; thence S 53° '"' 3^" 41,
113,63 feet t~ an in[ersection ~~~itii a iine para11F1 ~~ith ~nd ~rl~.^"~
feet easterly of the centerline of Fairi7ont Eoulevar:l; thence '1 '7°
i,i,' ~,~,:~ W~ ~.,~J ieeC; [nenc~ ~~i j>~ [.,: Si" t, I i j./'~ rc•e[; [hence
~~ 32° 52' 42" 1/, 200.~') feet to the point of heginnina.
UHEREAS, the City Planning ~ommission ~id hold ~ ptih~jC hearinq at the City
Hall in the City af Anah:im on Auqust 7_~~, 1='31, at i:3'~ p,m„ notice of said oublic
hearing having been duly given as reouired by lao-~ and in accordance with t`ie
provisiens of ihe Anaheim Municipal ~ode, Chapter 13.:~3, to hear 3nd consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use nermit and to irvestigate and
ma:e findin9s and ~ecommendations in connection th~re~•ritfi; and
l-lI1E('.EAS, said Commission, after due i~,pection, investi~ation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of a11 evidence ~nd reports
offered a[ said hearirc!, does fin~1 and de[erciine the following facts:
1. TnaC the proc~osed use is properly one for whirh i conclitj~~~i use
permit is au[hori~~.d '~y Anaheim ltunicipa' Code Section 1",!!~,'1,~.i3^ an-1
~~.l;ir.q~,~.12~ [o wit: co perrnit ~i churc:~, prrsc'ioc,l, ,~r.d office comoler, taith ti•raivers
of:
(A~ SEf.TI~t, ~ t ?h .~~.~_~lo _ •~inir.iuri lan:isc:pr.:! ~ctti~c!:
i ~0 eet requir~d adjacen*, to an
irterial hiq!~~:;~y;
't; fcet oropose:i)
PC31-183
li;) SECTI~!! 1' ~L,rh'~.;);1 -'t~r.irnun~ ~tructur~l heir~ht.
3'~ eCt (>I?fPlittrrJ;
1'1..'. eet pMpOSr~;~
(C) SECTIO!! 1.,..ii~,~~:),'1~12 -!tinimum numher of narL•in~ snaees.
?71 spaces rcquire-i;
1'~ sp7cr_; prn~nc~d)
~~) SECTI~)tl 1~.~5,~.~1.~~1") - Pcrr,ittcd numt~~r, tv,~e, .~nc~ sizn of sions
lone 7'1 s i~lentiric~~tion si~tn nerr+itted
:: Tonumcnt sians (1'!; anc! 1'~ sf ~~roposr_d)
7. That the orop~~sed use cnnsistin~ of a church an~f or~;chool is hr_reby
granLed suhject to the petitinner's sti~ul~,~inr at the nuhlic heariig t~ eliminate
the northerly nost e~rr_ss driveti;av Incated ap~~ror.imatelv il~~ feet south of Santa Ana
Canyon Road on Fairnont [3oulevard; and that th~~ center arcess drive nn Fairmont
Boulevard shail he ~ ~utual drive~iay sh.-~red 'y t'-e churci~ and comnercial o:`fiee
buildirg(s).
3. That the requested ~.~aiv~r (P,) i; herehy qranted on the hasis that the
reques[ is ri~j~~~~ and denial~.~oi:ld de~rive ;uhject nrnnertv ~f a nrivilece ~njoyed
by other preperties in T.he sa^~^ zene .inrl virinity,
f~. Tliat Chc rrqur.,tcd ~»iv~r (i;) i; iier~•by nrartcrf, in oart, nermittina a
efiurch sie~:ple no higher t'r,an ~t5 feet as r~ea;ured fre~ t'~e finished arade l~ve1 at
the hase of said st~eplc on [he ha~is of t`•c surroundinn hilly tononran~y and that
denial ~rould deprive su;;ject prn~ert~~ nf n ~rivile~ir~ enjoved Ly ot`~er nr~nerties in
the sanc zonc ,~nd vicinitv,
~. That the -c~qucst~•d ~~aiver (C) is hcrehy nranted on the hasis that a
recinrocal parkinc7 coven~nt for •~;e joint use of the parki~a facilities bv both ihP
~:~u~ ~~~ :, ~ L~~~ ~u.,u,~C~ ~i~ i ui f• ;n~ I i :,c apprrnien hy the Ci ty Aitorney's offic? and
reeorded prior to subdivision of su!,ject pro~er*y into 2 or nore parcels.
G. That the request~.d ;•raiver (G) is her~hy ~'~nied on the basis that
subject property is located in t~e Scenic Corridor Overlay lone and a nardship ~.~as
not demonstrated uy the ~etitioner and t'~~t apornval could set an undesirable
precedent.
7. That [fie proposed use, as ~ranted, ~iill not adv~rsely affect the
adjoining land uses and the ~ra~~t`~ ~nd develonm~n[ o~ t'~e arca in a~hich i[ is
proposed to he located,
~. That the size and shapc o~ the sitc prop~s~ri r"~,r t~~c use, as granted,
is adequate to allotir [he full development of [tie prc~~os~ci USP in a manner not
detrimental to the particular ar~a nnr t~ t'~r ^c~c^, health, sarety, and generai
we 1 farc of thc C i t izens of [he C i[y n{ Af1~f1C1~'1.
~. T~»t [hc Cor,c!ition~l ~~sc~ P~~rmi
t~~n~l ~in.i.,r tli~~ ~~n•ii i ir.ns i^inosed, i f
~nti• w( 11 not Lc detric~crt:•I n~ -
, t .,~_ace, hc~i[n, tit~r~tv inci or~nernl :velfare of the
Citi~~n, nf rir, ('ity oF ~.n::hci^.'
PC?1-1•93
1Q. That the traffic cierer~ted try the nrooosed use, as nranted, will not
impose an undue burden upon the streets and high~•!ays desi~ned and ;mproved to r_arry
the traffic in the area.
11, That no one indicated their presence at said ~ublic hearing in
opposition; and that no correcpondence ~ias rec~ived in oppc~sition te the sub;ect
petition,
Et:ViR0~JPIEMTAL IMPACT FIPIDI'rJ~: That the Flnaheim City Planning Commission has
revie~•~ecJ the proposal to reclassify sul~ject property from the RS-A-1!~,Opp(SC)
(Residential/AgriculCural - Scenic Corridor Overlay) Zone to the CO(SC) (f.ommercial,
Office - Scenic Corridor Ove!'lay) Zone to permit a church, preschool, and office
compl2x ~~ith ~aaivers of minimum landscaped setbacl;, maximum structural heinht,
minimum number of parl<in9 spaces and permitT.ed number, type ~n~l size of signs on an
irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of ap~roximately 5.( acres located at
the southeast corner of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Fairmont Boulevard, having a
frontage of approximately 13') feet on the south side of Santa Ana Boulevard and a
frontage of approximately S00 feet on the east side of Fairmont Boulevard; and does
hereby approve the Piegative Declaration fro~n the requirement to Arepare an
environmental impact report on the basis that there would he no slg~ifi~an*
individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this
Wegative Declara~ion since the Anaiieim General Plan designates the suh_ject property
for general commerciai land uses commensurate ~oith the proposal; tFat no sensitive
environmental impacts are involvecl in t~~e prnposal; that the Initial Study submitted
by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental ~mpacts; and that the Pleg~tive Declaration substantiatina the foregoing
findings is on filA in ~he City of ~nahei~n Planninc~ Department.
~1C1t:~, 1'i~EP,EFO^E, DE IT RESOLUED that the Anahein City Planninc~ Commission
does hereby gran+_, in part, subject Pet;tion for Conditional Use Permit, upon the
following conditions ~~~hic!i ~re hereby found to be ~ necessary prer~quisite to th~~
rrn~r,qr;~ ~~c~ ~f «y, ~~- • ~ ^ i -
~ ~-' :-...~j ~ .~vj~Ci"~`.~j i Cii uGi lCl ;/1 r7CrVl, I.I1,: Sd I C:~~/ anci yenera ;
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That this Cor.ditional Use Permit is arante~l suhject to the comnleticn
of Recir:issification ~lo. 31-82-h, no~~i pendin~.
2. That suhject prorerty shall be developed suhstantialiy in accordance
with plar.s and specifications on file ~~rith the City of Anaheim narked [xhibit idos. 1
through ~~; provided, hot•~ever, that the northern most egress driveaiay located
approximately 110 feet south of Santa Ana Canyon Roaci on Fai~-mon,t Boulevard shall be
eliminated, and that the church steeple shall be no higher than 1+3 feet as measured
from the fin9shed grade level at the I~ase of said steeple.
3. 7hat Condition fJo, ~, above-mentioned, shall be complied ~•~ith prior to
final buildir.g and zoning insp?ctions.
RE IT FURTIIER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plannin~7 Commisslon does herehy
find and deCermine that tlie adoption of tfiis Resolution is e;;~ressly predicatecl upon
applicar.t's compliance rrith each and all of the conciitions hereinabove s~t forth,
Should any conditiun or any part thereof, L-e declared invali~l or unenforceable !ry the
final judgment of any court of comoetent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any
approvals herein contained, =hal1 be deemed null and void,
-3- PC81-t~i3
TIIE FOREGQI~d~ P,ESO~JJTION. is signed and approvc~d by me this 7_4tn day of
August, 1981,
~f~',~%~i-
H ,MA~J PRG T[MPORE ~
ANAIiE I M C i TY PLIINN I Nf, C0~(N,~ I 0~!
ATTEST:
ln d2.r~. ~ a ~a.c^ ~
SECRET/1RY, AWAHE 1~1 C ITY FLAMN I"!G COF1;11 SS 10!J
, STATE 0~ CALIFORflIA )
COUWTY OF ORAtJGE ) ss.
, C ITY OF ANAIiE IF1 )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Plannino Corr~nission, do
heref~y certify that tiie foregoina resolution ~~as passed and ado~ted at a meeting of
' tiie Anaheim City Plannir.g Commissior, held on August 2lt, l~l~~i1, at 7:;0 p.m., by the
` following vote o` the memhers thereof:
i
; AYES: COMHISSIOtJERS: DFlP,NES, 60UAS, FRY, HEP,[?ST, h~rir,, Tflf_AR
NU[S: COMF115SlONERS: NONE
; AGSEh1T: CO~iMIS510'lERS: BUSt10RE
~ iN 411TMESS IJHEREOF, I have hereur~ to set my hand this 2!ath day of August, 19$1.
~//_~~~,r ,v /
_ (JGL(.l~v ~C - ~/l~ti .
, SECRETARY, ANAHE I H C I TY PLAMN i Nq CQM!1 I SS I(1^l
-~F- PC81-183