PC 81-190RESOLUTIO'I i10. PC ~1-1~~0
A f~;_SOLUTIn~! oF T~IE ~'1f:ilElt~ CITY ~~Lr.~l~ll~ir. rn11~'.I ;Slll!I
TiIAI fETITIOf! F01~ COill~l l'IfiPlI1L l!~E ('FR!1iT ~1(?. 22!~:i Si_ ~.R!\ilTCD
llil[REAS, ti~e /`,naheim City f'i~nninc7 C~~r.unission dici receive a verified
Petitic~n for Cc,nditicn~l Use Permit `mrn Cf10!IG SU'I P/1E1;, ~. C`. 3ox 1~5], Do~•mey,
California ~10240, oti•mer, ~~ncl JU~11:0 i)RIL[Y, 925~ ~rchid ^rivc, '.Iestminst~r,
L'alifornia ~;G~~, anent, of c~rt~in rcal prn~erty situated in the f,ity of
An~iheim, County of Oranqe, ;taCe oi Cnlifornia, described r,s:
Parcel I, in the City of f~nahcirn, C~unty of Crange, St~te of
Ca 1 i fo~'n i a, as sho~rn on a Pa rce 1 11ap ~- i 1 ecl i n Goo~. 1 1 c Pactes 7 and
3 0` Parccl F1~ps, in the office of the C~unty P,ecc~rder of said
County.
IJIIEREnS, tiie City Plannin~7 C~mmission did hold a public hearin9 at the Civic
Center in the City of (~naheim on Septemher 9, 1'lul, at 1:;~ p.m., notice o~ said
public nearing having been clul;i ~iven as re~uired by lai•r and in accordance arit;~ the
provisions of the ~naheim liunicip:~l Code, Chapter 18.Q~, t~ hear and consider
evidence for an~ aciainst said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
riake findings and recornmendati~~ns in connectiori there~aith; and
1ltIFREAS, said Cor:unission, after clue ins~ection, investi9ation and study made
by itself ar,;l in its hehal~, and after due consideration of all evidence anci reports
offered at said hearinc~, does find an:l determine the folloo-~in~7 facts:
1. That the proposed use is nro~erly one for ~~~hich a conditional use
permit is a~rthorized l~y Aralieim Munici~+al Code Section 13.~+~i.~5~.01~ to arit: to
permiC on-sale beer and ~•iine in a proposed reskaurant.
2. ihat the pr~~~osed use ~:~ill not aclve~rsely affcct the adjoining land uses
n_a ,,,+ r,~ h~ lnr.~tr~+rl.
and Ciie yr~o-,[i, dnu uevu i~~~~~n,~~L ~~~ ~~~~ ", ", ~ ~~ ..... - ~ . ~ ~ _ , ,
3. That the size and sna~+e of the site pre~osed for the use is adequate to
allow the full cJevelo~ment of the pro~oseu use in a manner not detrirnen+~~i to the
particular aro~ nor to the peace, health, safety, and ~tener~l ~,!~liare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
4. That the nr?ntinq of the Cnnditienal Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, wiii not be detrimental to the peare, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That the traffic generated by the ~roPosed us~ ~~~ill not impose an undue
burdan upon the streets and hi9hti•~ays desirined ancl ;mproved to carry ~he traffic in
the area.
G. ihat no one indicated their presence ar said public hearing in
opposition; anu that no cc~rresoondence ~•ras received in opposition to L'he subject
petition.
PC&1-190
[PlUIR01lMEt1Tl1L 111P/1CT FIPIf]Ildf: 'fhe Planning Director or his ewthorized
representative has determined that rha nro~osed project falls ~•~ithin the definition
of Catcgorieal Exemptions, Class 1, as defined in thc Statc ~IR Guidelines and is,
therefore, eate9orically exempt from the renuirement to prepare an EIR.
ti0ll, TIfEREFORE, CSE IT RLSOLVE~ that the Anaheim Ci*_y Plannir,g Commission
does hereby c~rant subject Petition for Conditional lise Perrnit, upon the foliotying
conditions ti:hich are her~by found Co be a necessary ~re re~tuisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in orcJer to preserve the safety and gene,•al aielfare of the
C i t i zens of the C i ty of /\naiie im:
1. That trasn stora9e areas shall he provi~ed in accordance o~i?h approved
plans on file a~ith the Office of the [xecutive Uirector of Public 6lorks.
2. That th~ owner(s) of suhject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
a fee, in an anount as determined by the City Council, for street lighting along E3a11
Road.
~. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
~rith plans and specifications on file ~~vith the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. l,
and provided, ho~~ever, tnat 25:.'. oY the floor area of the proposed restaurant shall be
devoted to food productian areas.
~s. That f,ondi tion tlo. 2, above-mer.tioned, shai 1 be comnl ied with prior to
the comnrncement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or nrior to the
time that the buildinc, perr~iiC is issued, or a~ithin a period of one year from date
hereof, ~vhichever occurs first, or such further time as the Planning Conmission may
grant.
`;. That Condition FJcs. 1 and "j, above-mentioned, shall be comolied with
prior to final building and zonirg inspections.
f3L' IT FURTRER RESOLVED that the ~;naheim City Planning Corimission dues heraby
i-inei anu uctermine thaC aaoption or this hesoiution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's cornpliance ~~~ith each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgn~ent of any court of c~mpetent iurisdiction, tlien this Resolutian,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be dceried null and void.
THE FOR~G01 IJG R[SOLUTI OtJ i s s i gned and approved by roe th i s 9th day of
September, 1~II1.
~~~ ~ .' ~~Pa'~^-O"'~
CHAI Rh1At~ , nilAhlE I M C I TY PLAl1~~ I NG COIIMI SS I ON
ATTEST:
`~ ~~ ~ ~ti.~,
5E CRETARY ,/1tlAlIE i M C I TY PL~~JtI I tdG COt1111 SS I 01i
-~- PCB1-190
ST~1TE OF C/1L1 FORIJ I A)
COUtlTY OF OR~tlGE ) ss.
L'ITY OF ANAIIEIH )
I, Edith L. Flarris, Secretary o( the Anaheim City Planning Cammission, :10
hereby certify that the foregoiny resolution 4~as passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on September ~, 1~331, by the follcx'ring vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: CO'•IMISSIOIJERS: f3/1RtlE5, L'OUAS, [3USIIORE, FRY, IIERCSSi, KItJG
tJOES: COMMISSIONERS: WOtlE
{16S[~JT: LOh1P11SSIOi7ER5: TOL11R
it! IJITIIESS 41ilEREOF, I have hereunto set ny hand this 9th day or S~ptenber,
1~31.
~~~~ ~ ~~~~~
5[CRETP,RY, AtIAI Elt1 CITl' PLAN(IIt;G C011NISSIOPJ
°3- PC~I-l~C