PC 81-212RFSOLUTIOi! U0, PC~1-7_12
A RESOLUTION OF THE AIJAHEIN CITY PLAPRdIIJr, CO!1MISSIO~d
TFIAT PETITI01! FOP, CONDITIONAL USE PERItI'f M0. 2?6!! BE GP.A~ITEf7
WNEREAS, the Anaheiin C.ity Pianning Commission did receive a verTf(ed
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from THE GALLFRY PAF,TMEP,SfiIP, 17?5 South Douglass
Road, Anaheim, Cal~fornia 92f306, o~mer of certain real property sit~ated in the City
of Flnaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
Parcel 1, in the City of Anaheim, County of Oran~e, State of
California, as shown on a Map rilecl in book 1~6, pages 12 and 13
of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder• of said
Orange County.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a pulilic hearing at the Civic
Center in the City or Ana!ieim on October 1~!, 1931, at 1:3~ P.m., notice of said
public hearing l~aving heen duly given as required by la~•~ and in accordance with the
provislons of the Anaheim Plunicipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear ancf consider
evidence for and against said proposed conriitional use perr~it and to investigate and
mal<e findings and recornnendations in connection thereo-~ith; anrl
WHFREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, inv~stigation and stuciy made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and re~orts
offered at said hearing, does find and determine tne following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for a~hich a conditional use
permit is autnorized by Hnaheim r^unicipai Code ~ection iu,~.i3. i~!i.~iiu anci i<,.-,?.u3i; eo
wit: to retain a massa9e service in an existing recreational facility.
2, The Ptanning Commission does herehy approve this use based on the
petitioner's stipulation that only one masseuse ~•iill be conCracted to work on the
premises at any giver. time.
3, That the proposed usE ~~+ill not adversely affect the adjoinina land uses
and the growth and development of tlie area in wliich it is proposed to be located.
4. That the size and shape of the sitc ~roposed for the use is adequate to
allow :he full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimentai to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general ~aelfare of tfie Litizens
of thE C?ty of Anaheim,
5, That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the con~iitions
imposed, if any, ~aill not be detrimental to the peace, hea~th, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anai~eim.
6. That the traffic generated by t,ie proposed use ~iill not impose an inidue
burden upon thr_ streets and hi9h~rays designecl and improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
7, That no one indicated their presence at said puhlic hearing ir~
opposition; and that no correspondence ~.vas received in opposition to the subject
petition.
E~IVIROPJME~ITAL I?1PACT FIN71tIG: The Planning Director or h's authorized
representative has deterr~ined that the proposed project falls i-~+thin the definitlon
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1, as defined in the State EIR Guirl~llnes and is,
therefore, categorically axempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOl•1, TFIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim CiCy Planning Commission
does hereby grant suhject Petition for Conditional Use Permlt, upon the Tollowing
conditions ~~hich are hereby found to be a necessary pr~requisite to the proposed use
of the subject property i~ order to preserve the safety and general welfare of t`ie
Citizens of the City of Analieim:
1. That suhject property shall be •~eveluped s~ihstantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Rnaheim r~arl;ed Cxnibit Nos. 1
through 5.
2. Tlia*_ only one (1) masseuse ~vill be on the premises at any given time.
liE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Conmission does hereby
find and deter•mine that the adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant~s compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any condition or any part thereof, be declared invalicl or unenforceable by the
final judgment or any court or conpetent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any
approvais herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
TIiE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOPJ is signed and approved by me this t~th day of
October, 1981.
~
CH I t~1AN PRO TEMPORE
ANAHEIM CITY PLAMPJIPI~ CO ., SSI0~1
ATTEST:
;~~-
`(.~ i i~':.'~ - _ i. . . ~21~
SECRETARY PF;O 7EMf'OftE,
AblAHEIM CITY PLAWNIP~f, COh1~41SSI0M
'~' PC81-212
STATE OF CAL1FORqIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF APlAHEIM )
~, Pamela H. Starnes, Secretary Pro Tempore of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certif
a meeting of the Anahein City~planningoCommissionsheld'on Octobers~d andnadopted at
P•m•~ by the fo)lo~aing vote of the memhers thereof:
_, t ~1, at 1:30
AYES: COPiMIS510NEP,S: BOUAS, FRY, KIPJG, TOLAR
~uOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOFlE
ABSEtJT: COPUIISSIOt~JERS: BARNES, E3USfi0RE, HEF,C~ST
~~1 WITNESS lJfiEREOF, I have hereunto set m
y hand this 1~3th day of October, 1981,
'r'./.:!.;:i : ~ ~ :!l~- ~ /
SE RETARY PRO TEMPORE./ ' ,. •~~'~~
ANAHEIM CITY PLAFWIFIf, COM,MISSIOti
-3- pcsi-~i2