PC 81-226RESOLUTION NO. PC81 -226
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 81 -82 -3 BE GRANTED.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from THE FIELDSTONE COMPANY, 17911 Mitchell Avenue,
Irvine, California 92714, owners of certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH,
RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCH LOS COYOTES, AS SHOWN ON A MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 3 AS
SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 150, PAGES 7 TO 11 INCLUSIVE OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on October 19, 1981, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; said public hearing having been
continued to the Planning Commission meeting of November 2, 1981; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property from
the RS- A- 43,000 (Residential /Agricultural) Zone to the RM -3000 (Residential,
Multiple- Family) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for low -
medium residential land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary
and /or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the
dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation
Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase In traffic which will be
generated by the intensification of land use.
6. That 10 persons indicated their presence at the November 2, 1981,
public hearing in opposition; and 30 persons indicated their presence at the October
PC81 -226
19, 1981, public hearing in opposition and that no correspondence was received in
opposition to the subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That Environmental Impact Report No. 113 was
previously certified by the City Council on March 16, 1974, in conjunction with the
approval of the Anaheim Shores Planned Community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title
18- Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above - described
property from the RS- A- 43,000 (RESIDENTIAL /AGRICULTURAL) ZONE and to incorporate said
described property into the RM -3000 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE- FAMILY) ZONE
upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite
to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
a fee, in an amount as determined by the City Council, for tree planting purposes
along Romneya Drive and Coronet Avenue.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Executive Director of 'Public Works.
3. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement
of structural framing.
4. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
5. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
6. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the
City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued.
7. That all private streets shall be developed in accordance with the City
of Anaheim's Standard Detail No. 122 for private streets, including installation of
street name signs. Plans for the private street lighting, as required by the
standard detail, shall be submitted to the Building Division for approval and
inclusion with the building plans prior to the issuance of building permits.
(Private streets are those which provide primary access and /or circulation within the
project).
8. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordinance No. 3896) in an amount as determined by the City Council,
for each new dwelling unit prior to the issuance of a building permit.
9. That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Office of
Utilities General Manager shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
-2- PC81 -226
10. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall present
evidence satisfactory to the Chief Building Inspector that the units will be in
conformance with Noise Insulation Standards specified in the California
Administrative Code, Title 25.
11. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall present
evidence satisfactory to the Chief Building Inspector that the proposed project is in
conformance with Council Policy Number 542, Sound Attenuation in Residential
Projects.
12. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1
through 7.
13. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition No. 1, above- mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights
granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the Planning
Commission unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the date
hereof, or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant.
14. That Condition Nos. 2, 4, 5, 7 and 12, above mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicants compliance with each and all of the conditions herelnabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 2nd day of
November, 1981.
ATTEST:
Ottcz Y.44,„
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on November 2, 1981, by the following vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
1981.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 2nd day of November,
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3 - PC81 -226