PC 81-231RESOLUTION NO. PC 81 -231
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 3242 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Anahelm City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Variance from DOUGLAS E. JONES, ET AL, 2045 South Harbor Boulevard,,
Anaheim, California 92802, owners, and VAUGHAN HERRICK, 7803 East Compton Boulevard,
Paramount, California 90723, agent, of certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California described as:
PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH,
RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA, CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SAID SECTION IS
SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF HARBOR
BOULEVARD AND ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, AS SAID INTERSECTION IS SHOWN ON
A MAP FILED IN BOOK 117, PAGES 35 AND 36 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS
OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY: THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF SAID
ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, SOUTH 89 43' 48" WEST 666.80 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 1 12' 57" WEST 353.05 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A LINE
PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 353.00 FEET NORTHERLY MEASURED AT RIGHT
ANGLES FROM SAID CENTER LINE OF ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, SAID POINT
BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE
NORTH 89 43 48" EAST 265.04 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE NORTH 1
12' 57" WEST 106.00 FEET; THENCE PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTER LINE OF
ORANGEWOOD AVENUE; NORTH 89 43' 48" EAST 400.72 FEET MORE OR
LESS, TO SAID CENTERLINE OF HARBOR BOULEVARD; THENCE ALONG SAID
CENTER LINE NORTH 1 20' 55" WEST 192.86 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER, AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAPS; THENCE SOUTH 89 54' 22"
WEST 665.28 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 1
12' 57" EAST 300.90 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 2: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH,
RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA, CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SAID SECTION IS
SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF HARBOR
BOULEVARD AND ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, AS SAID INTERSECTION IS SHOWN ON
A MAP FILED IN BOOK 117, PAGES 35 AND 36, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS
OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF SAID
ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, SOUTH 89 43' 48" WEST 666.80 FEET; THENCE,
NORTH 1 12' 57" WEST 353.05 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A LINE
PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 353.00 FEET NORTHERLY MEASURED AT RIGHT
ANGLES FROM SAID CENTER LINE OF ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, SAID POINT
BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE
PC81 -231
NORTH 89° 43' 48" EAST 265.04 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE NORTH 1
12' 57" WEST 106.00 FEET; THENCE PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTERLINE OF
ORANGEWOOD AVENUE; NORTH 89 43' 48" EAST 400.72 FEET MORE OR
LESS, TO SAID CENTER LINE OF HARBOR BOULEVARD TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING, THENCE RETURNING FROM SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THE
FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES; SOUTH 89 43' 48" WEST 400.72
FEET; SOUTH 1 12' 57" EAST 106.00 FEET AND SOUTH 89 43' 48" WEST
182.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1 12' 43" WEST 125.64 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 89 54' 22" EAST 582.75 FEET TO A POINT THAT BEARS NORTH 1
20' 55" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 1 20'
55" EAST 17.82 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on November 2, 1981, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings
and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a waiver of the following to permit a
free - standing sign:
SECTION 18.05.093.023 - Permitted location of freestanding sign.
(77 feet from south property line required;
(23 feet proposed)
2. That the above - mentioned waiver is hereby denied on the basis that the
petitioner has not demonstrated that a hardship exists due to the size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings of subject property.
3. That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property
that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and
zone.
4. That the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
5. That the requested variance will be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone
in which the property is located.
6. That one person indicated his presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: The Planning Director or his authorized
representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition
-2- PC81 -231
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 11, as defined in the State EIR Guidelines and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby deny subject Petition for Variance on the basis of the aforementioned
findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 2nd day of
November, 1981.
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on November 2, 1981, by the following vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
198 1.
! a R. �-¢-
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 2nd day of November,
ttice
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
PC81 -231