PC 81-25RESOLUTIGhI t10. PCl31-?.
A RESOLUTIO~~ OF TIIE AtJAHEIPt f.ITY PLl1t!P;ING C~r1~11SS1~!I
TNG1T PETITIO:'1 FOR RFCLASSIFICATION F10, u"0-%;1-22 PE ,f?/~i;TFD,
WHEREF~S, *_iic /lnaheim City Planninn Comaiission di.' recr~~ive a verified
petition for Reclassification from EILEEI! A. DRUIFF, 31G tlorth Siesta Street,
Maheim, Caiifornia ~2fi01, o~:~ner of certain real pro~erty situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Drange, State ~f Cali`ornia, described as:
Parcel ? of Parce~ Map rio. 7g-23~; in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of Californfa, as per ma~ filed in Book 13r~
Pa9~=5 ~E~ and 50 of Parcel Maps, ir~ the Office of the County
Recorder of said County.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a puhlic heartng at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on January 25, 19~1, ac 1:;0 o.m., ~otice of said
pubi ic hearing having been duiy given as rec~uired by lai~~ and in accorciance wit!-~ the
provisions of the Anaheim htunicipal Code, Chapter 1P,,03, to hear and con~;ider
evide~ce for and against said proposed reciassification and tn investi9ate a~d make
findinqs and recomnendations in connection there~,~ith; and
WIiCREAS, saici Corxnission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due c~nsiJeration of a11 evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find anci determine the fo~lov~in~ facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subjAct proverty from
the RS-j200 (Residentiai, Single-Famity) Zone to the R"1-240Q (kesidenttal, Multiple-
Family) Zone to construct a du~,lex.
2. That the Anaheim f,enrr~l Pln~ ~I~si,...-.~..~ ,.~,: ~ ~
density residentiai land uses. ° " •'~""~"` '""'~"' ~y ~~,r inr.dium-
and/or desirableafortthe orde~lydandcproperfdevelopme~t ofhthercommunity,~s necessary
~+. The.t the proposed reclassification of sub_ject prcperty does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally estahli,ltr_d in close proximity
to subject property and to the zon~s and th~ir oermitted uses generally established
throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of suhjPCt property requires the
improvement of streets in accordance ~•~ith the Circulati~n Eiement of the General
Plan, due to the anticipated i~crease in traffic ~~:hich ~~iili be qenerated by the
intensification of land use.
G. That ; persons inrlicated their presenc~ at said puhllc hearing in
opposition; and that a petition cuntaining 15 signaturos ~~~as rereivc~d in opposition
to the subject ~etition, anci ~ oetition cont~inin~ 1~~ sianatures ~:~as received
supportina subject request. ~
FC~iI-2~~
ENVIRQPiME~`JTAL IMPFlCT FIr~uIPlG: That the /lnaheim City Planning Commission has
revie~~red the proposal to reclassify su~ject propert~~ from the RS-j?.00 (Residential,
Sing;e-Family) Zone to the R^f-2'E~0 ~R~sidential, Hultiple-Family) Zone to construct a
du~lex on a rectangularly-s':aped parcel of land consisting of approximately 0.15
acre, having a frontage of approximately ;0 feet on the ~~,est side of Grand Avenue,
and located approximately 365 feet south of the centerline of Lincoln Avenue (123
South Grand Avenue); and does F~erehy approve the ?~e~ative Declaration from the
requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the hasis that there aloulrl
be no significant individual or cumulative adverse envir~nmental impact due to the
approv~l of this Me<;ative Declaration since the /lraheim Ganeral Plan desiqnates the
subject prooerty for medium-density r•esidential l~nd uses commensurate ~~~ith thr_
p roposa); that no sensitive environm~ntal impacts are tnvolve~J in the proposal; that
the Initiat Study suhmirted by the petitioner indicates no siqntficant individual or
cumulative adverse environmentai impacts; and that the Neqative Declaration
substantiating the foregoing findin~s is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning
Cepartment.
~O~d, THEREFORF., DE IT P,ESGLVED that the Anaheim City Planninq Commission
does hereby grant suhject Petltion for P,eclassification and, hy so dcing, that Title
18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code he amenied to exclude the above-describ~d
property from the RS-7200 (R[SIDEt1TIAL, SIN!;LE-F!1~11LY) Z~MF ar,d to incorporate said
described property into the R14-21~~0 (RESIDEPITI/;L, MULTIPLF-FAMILY) ZONE upon the
follo~~ing conditions ~-~hich are hereby found to hA a ncce.sary prerequisite to the
proposed use of suhject property in order to preserve the safety an~l general ~•ielfare
of the Citizens of the City of Anaheirn:
1• That the oamer(s) ot subject pro~erty shall pay to the City of Anaheim
a fce, in an amount as determined I,y the City Councii, for street lic~hting along
Grand Flvenue.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shail pay to the City of Anaheim
a fee, in an amount as determined by the City Council, for
al~nn Gr,r~+ n;,~;.~~. tree nlnnrt.,~ ,..
3. That sideivalks shal) he installed along Grand Avenue as required hy the
City Engineer and in accordance a~ith standard plans and specifications on file in the
Office of t`~e City Engineer,
~E. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
5. That the owner of subject prooerty shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appronrfate bv the
City Council, said fees to be naid at the time *he huildin~ permit is issueci.
~. That the o4mer(s) of suhject p~operty shall pay the trafflc sional
assessment fee (Ordinance No, 3896) in an amount as determined hy the C;ty Council,
for each new dwellinn unit prior to the issuance of a~~ui)ding permit.
7. That a~~propriate ~•fater assessnent fecs ~s determined hy the Office of
Utilities General Manager shall he paid to the City of Anaheim prfor to the issuance
of a huilding pcrmit; provided said pr~p~rty is to Le =erved hy City water.
-2 Pc3i-z5
~, That subject property shall be devei<~ped precisely in accordance viith
plans and specifications on file ~•,ith the City of A.naheim ma;•E:ed Exhibit Mos. 1
through 1+.
9. Prior to the introJuction uf an oidinance rezonin~ suhject pro~erty,
Condition t~os. 1 and 2, ahove-mentioned, shall he compl.^ted. The orovisions or
rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by aetion of the
Planning Commission unl~ss sairi conditic~ns are c~mplied i~~ith ~~ithin one year from the
date hereof, or such further time as the Planning Commission may arant.
10. That f,ondi~ien ilos. 3, 4 and 3, above-mentioned, shall he complied a~ith
prior to final I~uilding and zoniny inspections.
BE IT FUP.TFIER P,ESOLVED that tne Anaheim City Plar~ning Cormission does herehy
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance ~•~ith each ard all of the conditions hereinabove set fcrth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, he declared invalid ar unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, th=n this Resolu;:on,
ard any approvals herein contai~ed, shall be deemed null and void.
TI1E FQREGOI~~G P,ESOLUTIO~! is signed and avproved by me this 26th day of
January, 19u'1.
. ,,
_~ /
- ' ~
Chl~ I-R~1/1N,~ A!IAHE I H C I TY PL/1MN I MG CO'~~1 I SS 10~!
ATT[ST:
~~-~. ~ rda,~.~.~.
SFCRETARY, AN~HE I t1 C I TY PLAPlPJ I t!G COt•1M I SS I OU
STATE OF CAL 1 FORPI IA )
COUPJTY OF ORAPlGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEi~t )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim Citv Ptannina Commission, do
hereby certify tliat the foregoing resolution ~~~as passed and ado~ted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Plannin, Commission held on January 26, 1931, by the followin~ vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COP1h11SSI0PlERS: DAR~lES, BOUAS, rCY, rir~c, TOLAR
NOES: COt1F11S510NERS: BUSHOP,[
ABSENT: COMMISS10~9[RS: HEREiST
I~I WITNESS WIIEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thls 2Gth day of January,
1~~31.
(, C~:~ ~ /~.~.~„
SECRETARY, A~lAHFIM CITY PLA"!"ll~l~ ~COMNISS1l1N
-~- 2Cg1-7i