PC 81-27RESG~UTI~N tl0, pCP1_; ~
~_~
A RCSOLUTIOPi OF TFiF /1"lP,FIE!'1 f,ITY PI.AI;~II',~ ~nrp~IS^I~FI
THAT PETITI~~! FOR CO~IDITIO~IAL l1SE PER.'fiT rl,~, : ~r^ ~~ GRP,`ITF7
41HERE/1S, the Anaheim Cit•r P-~n~inn Comiission ~lid receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Pernit from J. I;EN? L;~td~~y, ET ql_, ~.7_1] Hii) llvenue,
4/hittier, California, 9pG~~~ o~;~n~,rs, .,nd !;f,LPH F, LE-.Pf',F, 1?7 South tdesr.ern Avenue,
Anaheim, California 92L'~1E, agent, of certain real nroperty situated in the City of
Anaheim~ County of Orange, State of CaliFornia, descr(bed as:
PARCEL 7_, Itd Tt1E CIiY OF A';~1HEIfd, CC~C~;TY OF OCP,P!GE, STAT[ OF
CALIFORiJIA, AS SfiO,,N 0;1 /l PARC.EL Pt./~P FIL!~ IN BO~Y, 7, P~r,E 1', pr
PARCEL FtAPS, It1 THE OFFIC[ OF THE C~U~!TY REC~RnER pp SAID u01!Pl?Y,
41HEP,EAS, the City Planning Comnission did hold a puhlic he~-(~q at the Civic
Center in the City of Anahei^~ cn January 2u, 1~31, at 1;~~~ p,r~,~ notice of said
pub)ic hearing having heen duly given as rec,uired by ia~•, and in accordance wirh th~
provisions of the Anaheim ;tunicipal Code, Chapter i:;,'~3, t~ !~~;~; and consider
evidence for and aqainst said pro~osed conditional use permit and t~ investinate and
maE:e findings and reeorvnendations ... conr,~c~;oi; Li~ere~vitii; anri
llHEP,EAS, s~id Commission, after due insoecti~n, investic~ation and study mad,
by itself and in its behalf, and after due considerar.ion of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearir.u, does finci anci determine the `oll~~~inq facts:
1. That the proposed use is pronerly one for ~•~Fich a con~iitional use
pern3t is authorized hy Anaheim Municipn) C~d~ C~,-~;..., ~~ r.~. ,
~~~~t«
_ " ~'-""° uCer ~n~ ':~ine in an exis*ing dr(v~-t~;r~u~h~r?staurant i~ntthe CL
(Commercia), Limited} Zone ~:~it(~ i•raiver of the fo11o~,,inq;
SECTI0~1 10,06,~90.~20 -!tinimum distance of drive-throuoh lane.
1~~ ~nt requir~d ber,.~Een orderinq
devtce and servic~ ~~iind~v,;
50 feet existina)
2• That the requested oraiver is he,-ehy qrantcd on the F,asis that the use
is existing ~nd the drivc-through lane was estahlished prior tn [he ado~rion of the
current code requirements.
subject to.revleatp~re nroposed use is hereby gr~n[ed for a peric:d of five (5) years,
petitioner, and if i~t,sis, ietermi~~~~nt`~~[ themuseUh~s notlhacina~raQVerse effect~hn
nearby businesses,
4. That no on-sal~ beAr or t~ine sh~~il be solcl at c.'~e dri~:e-throuq'~ a~indo~•~,
as clarificd by rh~ ~etition~~r at the puhl;~ hearinq,
5. That the proposeJ usc i~~i 11 not adversel•,• affect the adjc,f~i~c~ )~~~{ uses
and thc qra,~th ~nd d~~ve 1 opment oF the. area i n~•:!~ i ch i t i s rrn~c,sed c~ he located,
PC~ 1-?.7
(,. That tiie sizi: and shnpe of Liic ;iCc pro~~;ed for the use is ~dequate to
a11o~,a the fu1) devel~pment of thc p mnosed usc in a manrer not detrimental to the
partieular are~ nor *_o the ~~cace, !iealth, safety, and qcneral •v,e1;a~^ ~,f the Citizens
of the City of Fnaheim,
imposed, if anyhav i I1},notnrendetQimer,talletoot`~cl~tpe~ce,1l~hcalTh!t safetytf~and~nacne~ral
welfarc of the Citizens of the Cit~~ ~f ,lnaheim.
~%• That thc traffic aenerated f,y the prooosed use ~.•i~ll not' impose an undue
burder upon the streets and hi~!n•~avs designe~+ an~i im~roved t~ cirry the traffic in
the area. ~
9. That 1 person indicated her nresence at said public hearing in
opposition; and [hat no correspondence ~-ras r~ceived in opoosition t~ the subjeet
petition,
['JVI~~t,'tE`JiAL IMPACT FItl~1!!G: Thc Pl~nninn Direct~r ~r his authorized
representative has deterninc~ that the proposed prr~jPCt `alls r~ithin the definition
of Categorieal Exemptions, Cl~ss 1, a, rfefired in Paraaraoh ^ of [he City of Anaheir~
Environmental Impact Report Guidelines and is, there`ore, cate~~r~~a~t.. c~`~.^~ '
t'tc requlrenant to prepare an F:I~, ra~
'IOIl, THER[FORE, 6E tT RF~OLVEi~ that thc Anaheir~ City P?anning Commission
docs ~ierei.y grant subject Petition f~r Conditional I)SC~ Per'nit, uoon the follaaing
cunditions ~•~hich are here6y found to he a necessa rv prere~uisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to areserve t`ie safety and c~eneral ~-lelfare of thn.
C i t i~ens of the C i ty or Anahe ici:
~ 1. That subject pr~pe~[y ,~ia1~ be cJ~v~~~p~~ 5ubstantially in accordance
ly i t h P~ ~ fl S 9 nc~ c n~+ ~ i f i ~~ r i n.. ~ r~ i_
-' -~~~ ~~- ~~~~~~ ~'~~ ~i~y ur r~nahetm markeci Exhihit Plos. 1
and 2,
Z. That no on-sale bc•~r or a~ine sha11 he s~ld at ti~e driv~-throunh t•rindo4i.
3. Tha: the use is gr~nted for a period of five ~Sl ye~rs at ~vhich time an
extension may be grante~+ hy the Planning ~omnission upon i.~ritten request by the
petitioner.
EiE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
fin~ ancl determine that adoption nf tfiis Resoliition is exnressly predicated upon
applicant's campliance ~-~ith each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such eondition, or any ~ar[ [hereof, be declared invalici c,r unenforceabte
by the final jud~„ient of any cour•t of comp.stent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein ccntained, shall b~ Jeeme~i null and v~'~+
(NE F~r,Er,~;r~c 2FSOL!JTIO~! is ;ierr~i and a~pr~ved hy nu this 2!.th day of
January, 1~31, ~
CHAIRr+q~~, p~!qNF1~1 CITY~PL~1!J~lltir. C~'4115SiOM
ATTEST:
SECRET~RY, AWAHEI'd CI~PLA~IIUG C0;IMISSION
-:?- PC~`~1-27
STATE ~F C/1L I F~~!I I,~. )
COUt1TY OF O~P~FIGE ) ss.
C ITY OF AIl/+,H[ I!? )
I, Edith L. Harri>, Secr•~t:irv r,f [he l~n:ihcim Citv Fianninn Commission, ,1~
her~~'~v c~~r[ify that the forr~qning r~.~,luticn ~:-,~ n~;sr~u ,i~~: :r+~nt~~l .~t a^1Pntl(1Q of
thc :lnahcim City Plar~ning Commi,si~n hcld on J:~nu,~r~ "', 1 1, hy the Follrwino vote
of tl.c cicnbers ther~,oF:
AYEi: COry,'11SS10`;E~S: !3l~R~!ES~ BOfI~.S, P.USN(lc'F~ F^Y~ I:I'I~, T~~LA^,
~~QES : CO!1r1 ~ SS 10~lEP,S: ~JO~lE
A[35Et:'T: CO`11115510'lERS: F!ER.nST
I!1 ld1T`;ESS Wl~c"RE~F, I have hereunto set ~-~y hand this 2~th day of Januar~,
1~~1.
/
~~ .
SEC~ET,h?Y, A'dP,HEU CI?Y PLA.'l~~i~ar, cn'1NISSfO~!
-3- PC31-27