PC 81-29~
RFSOLUTIO'J t•!0. PC ol-2~
RESOLUf I OF; OF TIi[ Flt1/1HE I!1 C I TY PLA~~!I! I~1r, C0~1~1 I5S ! 0~!
TIIAT PC-iITIOtJ FOR UlaRIAI~CE :JO. ~i~h BE GR.~PITED
WN[REAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petitio~ for Variance from AFlAHE111 INSUR,4t1CE LE/1SFC0, i01 41est Fifth Street, Suite
1200, Los Angeles, California g0017, oa~ner, and E. E. ROUFIDS, LE ROY D. O~dEN COMPANY,
500 South 11ain Street, Suit~ 50G CT, Orange, California ?2~G`-;, aaent, of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheirt~, County of Orange, State of ~alifornia
desr,r i becJ as:
That port+on of fractional Southe.ast quar2er of Section 2~;,
To~Nnship it South, Ranye 10 41est in the P,ancho Ca_jon de Santa Ana,
as shown on a map thereof recorded in hook 51, page 10 of
Miscellaneous ~4aps, records of said Orange County, California,
described as follo~•~s: Beqinning at the most Easterly corner of
Parcel 1 of the iand descrihed in cieecl to Seventh and Olive
Corporation, recorded December 2.2, l~lo'~, in hool: ~11G~, page u07 of
Official Records of said County, said corner heina n point in a
curve concave Southt•resterly having a radius of 770.(ln fret, a
radial line of said curve passing through said point bears, North
42° 3~~ 53~~ East; thencs leaving •.~id curvey South i2° 23~ 4>"
41e;t 251.1 i fcet; tliencc P!crth 17~ 3~~ 75" !dest 150,00 feet;
thence ,dorth i2° %3' ~t5" East 13~.;1~ feet to a point in aid curve
mentioned above, a radial line o` said curve passin~ through said
last mentioned point bears ~orth 23° !17' 23" East; thence
~outheasterly ai~ng said curve to the poin2 of beginnina.
LdHEREAS, the City Planning Coromission did hoid a puhlic hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on January 26, 1931, at 1:3~ p,m „ notice of said
public hearing havin9 been duly given as required hy law and in accordanc= with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Cnapter 1~.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said pruposed variance and to investigate and make findings
and recommendations in connection theretivith; and
4lHEREAS, said Commission, after due ins~ection, investigation and study nade
by i*_self and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reNorts
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the follo~•~ing facts:
canooy:
1. That the petitioner proposes a~~aiver of the folto~Uing to erect a
SECTIOPI 13.1~~t.063.01~ - Minimum landscaped setback.
10 eet required; none proposed)
2. 7hat the above-mentioned waiver ~s hereby granted on the basis tha': the
canopy a~hich is located ~.iithin the setbark arer~ is not a permanert structure and on
the basis of the irrequiar shape of the property.
PC31-'~
3. That there are exc~ptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property involvcd or to the intended use o` the properl-y that do
not apply 9enerally to ehe property or class of use in the sam~ vicinity and zone.
!i. That the requested variance is necessary for the ~reservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other prooerty in the same
vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
5. That the requested variance ~•~ill nnt bc materially detrimental to the
pubiic a~elfare or injurious to the property or improvenents in such vicirity and zone
in wt,ich the property is located.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
oppositian; and that no correspondence v~as received in op~osition *_o the subject
petition.
E~!VIROI:ME'JTAL It1PACT FI?IDitIG: The Planninn Director or his authorized
representative has determined that the proposed project falls i~rithin the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 5, as derined in Para9raph 2 of the City of Flnaheim
Environmental Impact Report Guideiines and is, therefore, categnrically exempt from
the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT P.ESOLVED that the Anihelm City Planning Commission
does hereby grant suLject Petition for Variance, upon the follnwing corJitions vihich
are nereby found to be a necessary prer?quisitF to the proposed use of the subject
property in order to preserve thr_ safety and yeneral ~•~elfare of the Cittzens of the
C;ty of Anaheim:
1. That subject property sha11 be devel~ped substantially ir accordance
with plans and specifications on file 4~ith the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Plo, t.
BE IT FURTfIER R[SOLVED that the Anahei;n City Planning Commissio~i does hereby
find an~l det~rmin~ that adnption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance ~•~ith each and ali of the conditions hereinahove set ~~or~h.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurlsdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein rontained, shall be cleemed null and void.
TtiE FOR[co t rir R.ESOLU?10~! ; s s i gred and a~pro~~ed by me th i s 26th day of
January, ~9g1, ,
; ~. ~ ~ _ -~ ~
ChI~IRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLAIlMI~lG C0~IMISSIOP!
ATTEST:
'~,~,~~ ~ 1 .~~..~..,
SECRETAP,Y, ~NAHEIM CITY PLFNNING COMMISS!ON
_~_ PC31-7.9
STATE OF CALIFORNIA j
COUNTY OF OP,A~JGE ) ss.
CITY OF /\~JkHEI~i )
~~ Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commisston, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission lield on January ?_6, 1901, by the following vote
of tlie members thereof:
AY[S: COMNISSIOPIERS: BA~FlES, E30Ul1S, ~USfIORE, FRY, HEF65T, TOLAR
NOES: COMIqISSIONEftS: MONE
A[iSENT: COMPIISSIONERS: iJOtlE
IPl WITHESS I;HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 26tfi day of January,
193~.
~~-~ ,z~ ~/.. •
~t~ttE~ARY, Ap;ANEIM CITY PLA?lNIFlG C011MISSIQP!
-3-
PC31-?.~