PC 81-49N.14 ° 32'24 "W., - -- -72.00 FEET;
N.14 32'24 "W., - -- -88.00 FEET;
N.14 FEET;
N.14 ° 32'24 "W., - -- -63.27 FEET;
RESOLUTION NO. PC81 -49
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2179 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from WATT COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, INC., 2716 Ocean
Park Boulevard, Santa Monica, California 90405, owner, and TWO GUYS PIZZA GRINDER,
202 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California 92805, agent, of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
PARCEL 3: ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING: THAT PORTION OF
BLOCK E5 OF THE LANGENBERGER TRACT, PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1,
PAGE 550, MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA;
THOSE PORTIONS OF BLOCKS I AND K OF THE NEW SUBDIVISION OF
VINEYARD LOT D5, PER MAP RECORDED IN B00I< 17, PAGE 72,
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF SAID LOS ANGELES COUNTY; THOSE PORTIONS
OF BLOCKS D4 AND E4 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF THE PROPERTY OF THE LOS
ANGELES VINEYARD SOCIETY PER SKETCH RECORDED IN B001< 4, PAGE 630
OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAID LOS ANGELES COUNTY; THOSE PORTIONS OF
LINCOLN AVENUE (FORMERLY CENTER STREET), CLEMENTINE STREET
(FORMERLY CLEMEPITINA STREET), LEMON STREET, THE ALLEYS IN SAID
BLOCK 1<, AND THAT PORTION OF THE FIRST ALLEY NORTH OF SAID LINCOLN
AVENUE, LYING BETWEEN ANAHEIM BOULEVARD AND LEMON STREET, ALL OF
WHICH WERE VACATED BY RESOLUTION NO. 79 R306, RECORDED ON JULY 26,
1979, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 3495, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE
COUNTY, INCLUDED WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND: BEGINNING
AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE
NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF OAK STREET (50 FEET WIDE), FORMERLY FIRST
STREET SOUTH, WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LEMON STREET (49.50
FEET WIDE) AS SAID STREETS ARE SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF THE
LANGENBERGER TRACT; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION
AND SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF OAK STREET SOUTH 75 27' 59" WEST
128.38 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL 3,
THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
5.75 ° 27'36 "W., - - -- -5.00 FEET;
N.75 ° 27'36 "E., - -- 265.38 FEET;
5.75 ° 27'36 "W., -- -1 57.44 FEET;
5.75 ° 27'36 "W., - - - 102.56 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A RADIAL LINE, NORTH 31 27' 16" WEST, 119.31 FEET TO
A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF
945.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 55' 28 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 15.25 FEET; THENCE
RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE, SOUTH 30 31' 48" EAST, 1.00 FOOT TO A
POINT ON A CONCENTRIC CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A
RADIUS OF 944.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASERLY ALONG SAID CARVE,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 32' 44 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 3.99
FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND
PC81 -49
HAVING A RADIUS OF 10.13 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50 26' 08 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 8.92
FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY
AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 21.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID
CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 97 5' 18 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF
35.91 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE
SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 10.13 FEET; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50 26'
08 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 8.92 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COMPOI:NID
CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 944.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
0 32' 44 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 8.99 FEET: THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID
CURVE NORTH 26 33' 22" WEST, 1.00 FOOT TO THE BEGINNING OF
CONCENTRIC CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF
945.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 27' 40 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 7.61 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A
RADIUS OF 16.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 101 36' 37 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 28.38 FEET;
THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY
OF SAID PARCEL 3, THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
S. 14 ° 32'24 "E., - -- -89.91 FEET;
S. 14 °32'24 "E., - -- -73.98 FEET;
S. 14 ° 32'24 "E., - -- 136.29 FEET;
S. 14 ° 32'24 "E., --- -75.00 FEET;
S. 14 ° 32'24 "E., --- -25.00 FEET;
S. 14 ° 32'24 "E., - -- -59.68 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
N. 75 ° 27'36 "E., - - 50.06 FEET;
N. 75 °27'36 "E., --- 160.64 FEET;
N. 75 ° 27'36 "E., - -- - 80.33 FEET;
S. 75 ° 27'36 "W., - -- -25.08 FEET;
S. 75 °27'36 "W., - -- 207.60 FEET;
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on February 23, 1981, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section Nos. 18.44.050.010 and
18.44.050.300 to wit: to permit a semi- enclosed restaurant with on -sale beer and
wine.
3. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses
and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
{articular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
-2- PC81 -49
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
reviewed the proposal a semi - enclosed restaurant with on -sale beer and wine on an
irregularly- shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 10.5 acres located at
the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard (202 West Lincoln
Avenue); and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration from the requirement to
prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that there would be no
significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval
of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject
property for general commercial land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no
sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study
submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative
adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating the
foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1
and 2.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 23rd day of
February, 1981.
ATTEST:
het A�'r4/i/i.GEv„,
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3-
CHAIRiAN, ANAHEIi CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
PC81 -49
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on February 23, 1981, by the following vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
1931.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of February,
SECRETAR ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-4- PC81 -49