PC 81-57RESOLUTIU~I PlO, PC31-57
A RESOLUTiOId OF THE AIIAHEIr1 CITY PLAIINI!lr, COt?~11SSIOt1
TIiAT PETITIOPI ~OR RECLASSIFICATI0~1 il~. 80-81-27 DF DE~lIFD.
IJhIEREAS, the F~naheim City Pianning Commission did receive a verified
pet i t ion for Rec lass i f i cat i on f rorn R I CHARD FltdTIIONY APlD LUCY A~;TNOtIY, 17~0 West Ba 1 1
Ruad, Anaheirn, Caiifornia ~28'12, ot•mers of certain real property situated in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Califo~nia, described as folloa~s:
LOT 1 OF TP,ACT IlO. 1981 , AS SH041H ON A t1AP P,ECOP.DED I tJ DO~Y. 67,
PAGES 2(i, 27, 23 AMD 29 OF t1i5C,ELLAtJEOUS MP.PS, P,ECORDS OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALlFORNIA.
W4EREF~S, the City Planning Commission did hold a pui~lic hearing at the Civ:c
Center in the City of Anaheim on March 'L3, 1981, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by la~~ and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1~.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate ~nd make
ftndinas and recommendations in connection there~•~ith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investlgation and s~udy macie
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the followin~ facts:
'I. That the pe!itioner proposes reclassification of subject property from
tiie RS-7200 (Residential, Single-Farrily) Zone to the C~ (Commercial, Office and
Professional) Zone.
2, That the Anaheim General Plan designates suhject prooerty for lcw-
density rPSidential land u~es.
3. That tfie proposed reclassification of subject property is hereby denied
on the basis that it woul~l be "spot zoning" ~,ahich ~rould have a detrimental effect on
the surrounding residen*_tal area and, furthermore, ~•rould set an undesirable
precadent.
'v. That th~ proposed reclassification of su'~ject ,~ro~erty is not necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of tFA community.
5. Tha; the proposed reclassification of subject property does not
properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close
pr~ximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally
es~ablished throughout the community.
6. That no one indicated Cheir presence at safd public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence t•ras received in opoosition t~ the subject
petition.
E~IVIROP~FIE~~TAL IMPFlCT FIFlDIWG: That the Anaheim City Planning Commissior, has
rnviewed tFie proposal to reclassify suhject property fror: the RS-72^~ (Residential,
Sirtgle°Family) Zone to the CO (Commercial, Ufftce anei Professional) Z'one to permit
PC81-5;
commercial use of residential structure witn ~•raivers of permitted location of
required parking and minimum landscaped setback on a rectangular]y-shaped parcel of
land consisting of approximately 0.1~ acre located at the southti•~est corner of Ball
Road and 4lalnut Street (1200 41est E3a11 Road), and does hereby approve the Negative
Der_iaration from the requirement to prepa re an environmental impact report on the
basis that tliere a~ould be no significant individual or cumu)atfve adver=_e
environmental impact due te the apFroval of this Negative Declar•ation since the
Anaheim General Plan designates the subject pr•operty for loa~-ciensity residential land
uses commensurate with the proposal; that no senslYive envlrqnmental lmpacts ar~
involved In the propas~l; that the lnitial Study su~nitted by the petitioner
indicates no significant individ;ial or cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and
that the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoinq findings is on file tn the
City of Anaheim Planning Department.
NO't~l, TfiEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plannirg Commission
does hereby deny suf~ject Peti[ion for Re~lassifica*_ion or, the basis of the foregoing
findings.
THE fOP.EG01PlG RESOLUTIOF: is signed and approved by me this 2jrd day of
Plarch, 1~81,
ATTEST:
~. ,~ ~~~~
SECP,ETARY, APIAHE IN C ITY PLANN IA~G COMM ISS IOhI
STATE OF CALIFORWIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
C ITY UF APIAHE IM )
I; Edi;•h i. u,..~;~ ScG-c`~r•. ._c ., .
. ~. y..~ ~„c: ruidiieiin i,ity riannine l:ommission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution ~fas passed and adepted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on Harch 23, 19~1, hy the following vote of
the membe~s thereof:
AYES: COM1115SIOPdERS: BAP,NFS, ~USHORE, HERBST, TOLAR
NOES: COMHISSIOIJERS: QOUAS, FRY, KING
ABSEtJT: COPIMIS510;lERS: ~JOt1E
IW 411TtiESS WFIEREOF, I have hereunto set my hancl this 7_3rd day of March,
1931.
~CY.L.X--~C.~ ~ r~(~ J
SECRFTARY, ANAHFI~~1 CITY PLA,dNI,i~ co~+rtissiorr
~ ~-~/~ :(~~l l:~ -~(~- L
CF!AIRI4AN, A~J/1HEIM CIT PLAtJPlIF1G COMMISSIOM
-2- PCIIt-;7