PC 81-58RESOLUTI011 ~JO. PCi~I-53
/1 R[SOLUTI011 OF THE Ati/11iE1'1 CITY PLAMPIItdG C0~?Hi551~N
THAT PET~TI0~1 FOR CONfJITIOFIAL l!SE FERMIT "J0, ?138 L[ D~P!iED
WNERE.4S, the Anaheim City Planning Cvmmission rlid receive a verified
Pet i t i on for Cond i t i cna 1 Use Pe!-m i t from R I CFIARD A~ITFfOMY AND LUCY A~ITHONY, 1 2'1~ 4lest
t3a11 Road, Anaheim, California, 92302, oti~mers of certain real property situateci in
the City of ~jnaheim, County of Orange, State of Calirornia, descrlbed as:
LOT 1 OF T'ACT PJO. 1 ~31 , AS SNOWPI OP~ A h1AP R[CORf1ED I t~ B0~1< 57,
PAGES 7_E, 27, 2S3 AND 29 OF ~11SCE~LANE0~15 h1APS, RECOR~S OF ORAPlGE
COUtaTY, CAL I FOf;~I IA.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on March 23, 19$1, at 1:30 p,m., notice of said pubiic
hearing having been duly given as required by la~.~ and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1°,c?3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said ~roposed conditional use ~ermit and to investi;ate and
make findings and recommendations in connection there~•~ith; and
lJH[BEP,S, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offereo at said hearing, does find and determine the fo11o~~~inq facts:
1, That the proposed use is properly one for a~hich a conditional use
permit is authoriz~d by Anaheim Hunicipal Code Section 13.41.r5n,i3~ to ~~~it: to
permit thP commercial office use of a residential structure ~•~ith waivers of the
fol loi-~i ng:
(a) SFCTIO~J 1o.41.n5~.13`i - Permitted location of re uired parkfng.
Parkinq at rear o resi~iential structure
required; parl~inq at stdes oroposed)
(bj SECTIOP! 18.41,n5o.~34 Minimun landsca ed setb,icE•.
and lc",.1+1,OE3,010 - 10 feet required from arterial highw.ay;
~ 5 fee~ existirg)
2. Tnat the proposed use is hcrehy denied on the basis ttiat the requested
conjunctive reclassificati~n wes den(ecl.
3. That :he requested ~yaivers are herehy denied on the basis *nat the use
was denied and that the petitioner did not demonstrate hardsfiips appitcable to the
property including size, sh~pe, t~poaraphy, location or surrcundings which ~1o not
apply to otlier ~rooerties in the same zone anc; vicinity,
4, That the proposed use o~ill adversely affect the adjoining land uses and
the gr~~~~th and aevelopme~t ofi th~ area in ~vh'ic.h it is propnsed t~ he located,
S. That the size and shape of the site a m nosed for the use is not
adequate to ~i1o~•~ the fu11 develo~ment of the prooosed use in a manner not
P~81-5~
detrimentai to the particular area nor to thr_ pear_e, health, safety, and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim,
6. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit ~~rill 6e detrimental to
th~ peac.e, healtn, safety anu general welfarP of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
7. That the traffic generated by tne prooosed use wiil lripose an imdue
burden upon the streets and higho-,ays designeri and improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
8. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no corres~ondence was received in opposition ta the suhject
petition.
EtIVIRONt1E~JTAL I,MPACT FIt1DING: That the Anahe;m City Planr.ing Commission has
reviewed the proposal or reclassi ication of sul~ject ~ro~Prty from the RS-7200
{Res(dentiai, Single-Family) 7..one t~ the CO (Commercial, Office and Professional)
Zone tu permit commercial use of residential structure ~•fith ~•raivers of pernitted
location of required parking and minim~~m landscapeci se.thack nn a rectangularly-shapeci
parcei of land consisting of approximately 0,1; ac.re located at the s~uthwest corner
of Ball Road and 41aln~t Street (1200 West Ball Road), an~i does hereby anprove the
Wegative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an envirnnmen*_al imp~ct report
on the basis thaL there ~•rould be no significant ind~vidual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the
Anaheim General Plan designates the suhject property for stngle-famtly residential
land uses commensurate rr9th the proposal; that no sensitive environmentai irrpacts are
involved in the proposa;; that the fnitial Study ,uhr~itte~! by the petitioner
indicates no ,ignificant individual or cumulative adverse environr~entai impacts; and
that the PJegative ~eclaration substantiating the foregoinc fin~ings is on f(le in the
Ci;.y of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOId, THFRFFt1RF rtc ~T nr~ni ~~~.. ,
-` ~ ~i~d~ ~ii~ Hnaheim i,ity Ntanning Cornmission
~!oes hereby deny subject Petition forVConditional Use Permit on the hasts of thP
aforementioned rindings.
T4E FOFEG01~•IG R[SOLUTIOtI is sig~ed and a~proved 6y me this 23rd day of
March, 1901,
~ ~ / i '
i'%~~ C ~ ( ~ ( t.. ~ ( . ~ /'C'. ~
cH~. i R.Mari
ANAhiEiM CITY PLA~JN1~~6 r.n~+M~sslnri
ATTES7: ~ '
/~16~G,~ ~,~ ~ ' ~
SECRFTARY, APJAHEIM CITY PLA~lNING COM~iISS10`1
°z- PC81-5~5
STATE oF CAL I FOf;r~ I A )
COUtJTY OF ORA~JGE i ss.
CITY OF AWAHEI~i )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the An~heim Cit~r Plannin~ Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoir~~ resolution ~•~as passed and ad~pte~1 at a meetin~ of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on hiarch 23, t~~l, hy the follotding vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIOPlERS: BARPIES, iiUSHORE, HERBST, TOL:R
NOES: CO!1t115510!IFRS: GuUAS, FRY, Y.I"1G
A[3SEPJT: CO!1~11SS10;!ERS: iJ:)'!E
IFI 4JIT~lESS 4iHE^EOF, I have hereunto set my han~I this 23rd day of March,
1931.
~~ ~ ~~
5ECREI:ARY, ,~~;,AHEIN CITY PLAM~JI?~G COMFIISSIOta
-3- PCf31-5~