PC 81-68RESOLUTIO~~ rao. ~c8i-G^
A R[SOLUTI01~ OF THE APdAIIEli1 CITY PL~!.'IJI~;G C0'1t1!SSIO'•I
THAT PETITIO~J FOR C0~lDtTIOIlAL USE PEk~11T P:O, ?iR~ aE GP,ANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City °lanning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditiunal Use Permit from ALAtI SEG,1L., ET AL, P. 0. Box 193, La 'lirada,
California, 9u637, ovmers, and CYt1TNIA f30GA~J, 27.27. 41est Oran9e Aveni.ie Boulevard,
Anaheim, Caiifornia 92~0>, agent, of certain real property sit~i~+ted in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State or California, described as:
Parcel 1: That portion of the Idor~heast quarter o` the Southeast
quarter of Section 1i3, Tafmship 4, South, Range 1n :!est, in the
P.ancho Los Coyotes, City o`.Anaheim, as per map recorded in book
51 page 10 of 'liscellaneous t1aps, records of said Oranae Countyy
Ca. Shown as Parcel 3 on a map recorded in boo4; 5~~ page 2~ of
Parcel P1aps, in the office of the County Recorcier of caid County.
41HEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hoid a public hearing at the Civic
Center in tne City of Anahein on April G, 1~31, at 1:3^ P.~., noticA ef said nuhtic
hearin9 having been duly given as required hy ia~•~ anrl tn accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Hunicipal Code, Chapter 1.'~,03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate a~d
mal:e findings and recc~nmendations in connection there~-iith; and
WHEREC:S, said Commission, after due inspection, ~nvestigation and study made
by itself and in its hehalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said ;iearinq, does find and deterrine the fo)loo-~inc~ facts:
1, That the proposed use is prc,perly one for ~~~hich a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Plunicipal Code Section 10.41:,~50,~1'1 to permit on-
sale beer and ~yine in an existing restaurant.
3. That the proposed use i~~ill not adversel~~ affect the adjoining land uses
and the grc~~rth and development of the area in ti~~iich it is proposed to Ue located.
lt, That tlie size and sha~e of the site prooosed for the use is adequate to
allow the full development of thc proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general o~elfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
5, That the granting of the Conditiona~ Use Pernit under the cond:tions
imposed, if any, ~:~ill not be dFtrimental to the peace, :~ealr.h, safety and general
wrlfare of the Cit~zens of the City of Ana(ic:im.
G, That the trarfic generated by the proposed use a~ill not imoose an undue
burden upon the streets and higin~ra~~s desi9nerl an~i If!1!?1"QVP.(j t~ carrv the traffic in
the area.
PCIIt-(8
I. TI»t no one indicated their ~~r~,ence at ,aid
opposition; and t~iat no corres~ondencr_ ~ia; r~ceived
petition. ~~ o f~ublic hcarin~ in
~~'OS~~~~~ t~ the subject
EflVIROf~P1E~1T:1L 111P/1CT Firl~I'!~: Tl~e Plannin p;
represeniativc~ has determined that the propos~~ `~ r~:ctor nr
of CaCeyorical Exemptions, Class 1 as def~ nrOJect fa~~; ~;~ithin h~~ ~uthorized
therefore, cateeorically ' ~~~ in the Sta?~ ~ th~ definition
exempt from the requirement to prepareCan E'fRdeiines and i~~
N01•!, ~HE~EFORE, CsE IT RESn~~rEp tfi~t ttie qnaheim Cit Plannin r
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit u on
conditions i. Y 9 ommission
~hich are hereby founcl to he a necessar ' P the followi~q
of the subject property in order to preserve thc safePrerequisite to the proposed use
Citizens of the City of Anaheim: Y a~~ 9eneral iyelfare of
t~tF
~• That subject property sfiall 6e deve)oped su~~stantially in accordance
and 2
with plans and specirications on file a~it!i the City of Anaheim ma~ked Exhibit Nos. 1
f~~d and determineTthat~adoptEonto~pt tiie Anaheim C?
aopiicant's compliance ±•~ith each tY P~~nnin~7 CommissP~~ ~oes hereby
this P,esolution is expressly predicated upon
Should any such cond:tion, or ~~~ ~~~ a>> of the conditions hereinabove
bY the final iud~ment of any courtroft~~~m~~etent~ deCl~red inLaiid or Set forth.
and any approvals unenforceable
herein corttained, sha11 be deemedurisdtction, then this Resolution,
nuli and void,
~_°~1.
T!IE FpREG01^1G RESOWTIOtI is slyned and apprqved 'uy me this Gth day of ,qPri~~
~ "' l i
~~~! i . ~ : ~ ~ ~ / . '~ ~ ~ .i
!.
~TTEST: CHAIRM,4~;, At~qNE,l~1 CITY PLANNItJG C0~1!415SION
`~~~ D ~~~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEI!I CITY PLA~J~lT I~~~p~1'11SSIOF!
STATE OF CALIFOR!JIA )
COU~lTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY Or ANANEIM )
~' Edit~ L. Harris, Secre.Yar of the
hereby certify that the foregoin re y A~ahein City P1anning Commission, ~1~
the Anal7eim City Planning Commission~held~on~~qpr~~SSE~~ ~~d ad°~~e~{ at a
the members tliereof: meettnc~ of
~~ 31+ ~~Y the folloti•~ing vcte of
AYES: COM?1ISSION[RS; E3qR~lES, 6CfI~S, BUSffO;F FRY ~
NOES; COF1~•IISSIO~JERS; ;~O~JE ~ H~P,PST, P;I~Jr, TOLA~
ABSENT: COPIMISSI~;~~FRS; ~~~p~E ~ '
IN WITI~ESS 41hER~UF, I have her~unto set ny hand t!~is (nc ~l~}, ~f ~oril. 1"^1.
SECRETA^Y, A~dq~,~~ ~ J~^'
, . M ± ,~
'~-
Pr.st-r,;;