PC 81-92RESOLUTIO'I M0. PC21-97_
A RESGLUTI~N Of THE Ai9AHEl~1 CITY PLlltitdi~;r C~~~'11SSInPI
ThIAT PETI-i 10'1 F~R COt1DITI0i1FlL USE PFR~~i i'd0. 21°~ BE G~P~.^1TFf1, I~! P~.R.T
',JFiERE/~S, the Anaheim City Planninq f,ommission did reccive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from tS. J. BROCK & S0~!S, IPIC.y 1~.~? Greenbriar
Lane, Brea, California, ^2:';21, o~•mr_r, of certain real property situatecl in thP City
of Analieim, Count, of Orange, StaCe nf California, described as:
LnTS 1 T~ ; IPJCLUSIVL, LUTS 13 TO 2~: INCLUSIVF ArJn LOTS 3~ T~ <<3
It1CLUSIVE, ALL OF TE;ACT N0. u79u, A~ S!i0411J Otl A NAP RECO?.DED IP!
[3001; 1F3~E, PAGES 24 I1tJD 2~ OF ~11SCELLkFIEOUS MAPS, REC0~~5 OF QRA'JGF
Cn~~~~TY, CAL I FORrI IF1.
WNER[AS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearinci at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on llpril 20, 1^ul, ~t 1:3~ P.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required hy la~:~ and in accordance with the
provisi~ns of the Anaheim "tunicipal Code, Chapter 1?.~3, to I~ear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use perm~t and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection thr_re~.~rith; saicl p~~hlic hearing havin9
been continued to the °lanning Commission meeting of F1ay ~, 1'~'1; and
W'rIEREAS, said Comr~ission, after due inspection, investiqation and study made
by itself and in its hehalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the foile~~~ing `acts:
1, That the proposed use is properly one for t~~nich a conJitional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim MunicEpal Co~e Section 1".'130.f?'~~,~1Q to arit: to
oermit a hosoital oarkinn ini ~•!iih ~•,aiv~r nf;
SECTIO~IS 13.04.J~i3.102 and 1'~.32.~6~E,07~'1 - Maximum fence heiaht.
Z. That the requested waiver is herehy denied on the basis that revised
plans were srbmitted deleting the need for said ~~afver.
3. That tl~e proposed use, as granted, ~yill ~~~t adversely affect the
adjoining land uses and tne gro~,tl, and development of ttie area in aihich it is
proposed to be located.
4. That the size and sl7ape of the site pro~osed for the use, as yranted,
is adequate to allo~~ the full development of the prooosed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and qeneral
welfare of the Citizens of the City or Anaheim.
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the condittons
imposeC~ l'Ji~~ not be dcr_rlmentai to the peace, heilth, sa~ety and general arelfare of
the Citizens of the City nf ,4naheim.
PC81-92
~
6. Tf;at the traffic gencrated by th,e prn~osed use a~ill not inpose ~n undue
burden u~on the streets and hight•~ays designed anci improvPd C~ carr~~ the traffic in
the area.
7. That (. ~ersons indicated thefr presence at saSd public hearinn in
opposition; and that no correspondence i•las received in oppo,ition to the sub.iect
petition.
E"~VIROtlHENTl1L 1~1PFlCT FItIDIPIG: That tl~ie Anaheim ~ity Planning Comnission has
reviewed the oroposal to perroit a hospital parkinc~ lot ~~ith ~raiver of maximum fence
height on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting o` approximately 2.9 acres
having a frontage of approximately 350 feet on tlie south side of Romneya Drive,
having a maximum depth of approximately 4G0 feet being located aoproximately 1650
feet from the cer.terline of Euclid Street; and does hereby aporove the Negative
Declaration from the requiremc;nt t~ prepare an environmental impact report on the
basis that there arould !;e no slgnificant individuai or cumulative adverse
environmental iinpact due to the approval of this Pleyat?ve D~c)aratic,n since the
Anaheim General Plan designates tlie suhject prooerty for loro-medium density
residential land uses c~mnensurate v:ith the ~ronosal; rhat no sensitive environmental
impacts are involved in the pro~osal; that the ~nitial Study submitted by the
petitioner im.iicates no significa~t individuai or cumulative adverse e m~ironmental
imoacts; and t~iat the PJegative Declaration suhstantiating the foregoinq findin~s is
on rl~n in tlie City of Anaheim Plann`ng Ueoartnent.
N01J, THEREFORE, BE 17 RESOLVED that the AnaLeim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant, in part, subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the
follcwing conditions wh~ch are here!:y found to be a necessary prerer7uisite to the
proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and oeneral
~~elfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That appropriate a~ater assessment fees as determined by the Office of
Utilities General Manager shall be paid to the Citv of Anaheim nr(~r tn an~rnval nf ~
rinal tract map,
2. lf~at fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary hy the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement
of ehe intended use of the property.
3. That suhject property shall be served by underground utilities.
4. That a modified cul-de-sac, or other cnnfi~~~ration as approved hy the
City Engineer, shall be constructed at the easterly terminus of Outrigger 4!ay (P~rcel
1 an!i Parcel 2), and that a bond in ar amount and form approved by the City of
Anaheim shall be posted with the City of Maheim oriorto 3pproval of ,hc flnal pirce',
map to gi.iarantee the construction prior to heginnin4 the inten~ied us~~ nf the
property.
5 That streer_ names he reassi9ned as apo m ved by the Planning Denartment
prior to approval of the final parcel map.
-2- PC31-92
G. In the ev~nt tl;at sul~ject pro~erty is to be divided for the purpose of
sale, lease, or fin~ncing, a parcei map, to record the a~proved division of subiect
property shall ue suLmitted to and approved by thc City of Anaheim and then be
recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder.
l. ThaC subject property shall be de~•eloped suhstantia!ly in accordance
taith plans ~nd specifications on file iiith the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1
and 2.
~. That Condition Nos. 3, ~i, and 7, above-mentioned, shall be comolied
~~+ith prior to final building a~d zoning inspections,
[iE IT ~i1RTI1ER RESOLV[D that the Anafieim City P)anninc~ Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is ex~r~ssly predicated upon
applicant's compliance tivith each and all of the condittons hereinabove set forth.
Should any sucfi condition, or any part tt~ereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of conipetent jurisdiction, then this RPSOlution,
and any approvals (ierein contained, shail he deemed null and void.
THE FORFG01~l~ RESOLUTIO~! is signed and aoproved by me this 4th day of May,
1 ~181 ,
ATTEST•
~/ ~~
CHA~I°MA~l, At1AF!EIM CITY PLAPIt!Itd_r, C~M'11SSIOH
~~~~ ~ ~~~J
SE~RETARY, ~AtJAHElt1 CITY PLA~ItdI~J, C0~IHISSION
STATE OF CALlFORNIA )
C~UrITY OF ORA~•IGE ;~ ss.
~ i i r i~F HNNHE l rt )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning C~~mission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was aassed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on ~1ay 4, 1~;i1, by the folloU~ing vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, FIERBST, KItJr,, TOLAR
i~lOES: C0~1t•115510NERS: BARMES, ~USNOFE
AEtSFtdT: COIIMISSIONERS: FRY
I(1 WIT~dE55 4IHEREOF, I have hereunto set ny hand t!;is Irth day of '1ay, 1qR1,
~~.~.~ .~ ~
SECRETP.P,Y, Fl~AHEIFI CIiY' PLA~1NINf, COHHIS510N
-3- PCc~t-~i2