PC 82-12s
RESOi_uriori r~o. Pr,^a..-i~
a
A RESOLUTIO^! OF TNE At•lAHEIM CITY PLAMNI~J~ COMMISSI~M
THAT PETITIOPJ FOR CONDITIONAL USE PFR!11T N~). 22~3 '3E GRA~ITED
WfiEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Co~nmission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permtt from Elhert L. and Lida L. Smith, 12921
Wheeler Place, Santa Ana, California, 97_7n5, owner, and Budqet Rent-A-f,ar of
Orange County, 404~ Campus Drive, Ne~~~port Beach, ~alifornia 976I,~, agent, of
certatn real property situated in t!ie City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of California, described as:
PARCEL 1:
THAT PORTIOM OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION ??, TQWPJSHIP ~c
SOUTH, RANGE 1Q WEST, IP! THE RAhlCHO SAN JUAPJ CAJ~N DF SANTA AN/1,
AS SAID SECTION !S St10A~N ON A MI1P RECORDFD IN B~~K ~1, P~^,E 10, OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, ItJ THE ~FFICE OF THE Cl?Ur~TY RECORDFR OK SAID
COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOIJS:
BEGINNINa AT A POINT Old THE SOUTHERIY LIME OF T!iE LAMD DESCRI~3F!1
IN DEED TO THE STA7E OF CALIFORNIA, RFC^RDED t1AY 5, 1^5!1, I~~ BO~K
2008, P~;ES 5II6 A~JD 538, QF OFFICIAL RFf,ORnS, EASTERLY 21~,n0 FEET
FROM TH[ CENTER LI~lE OF HAFBOR BOULEVARD; THENCF SOi!TH n nEr,, 1h~
25" EAS? 150.00 FEET, PARALLEL blITI-I SAID CE`lTER Ltr•IF 0~ HAP,BbR
BOULEVARD; THENCE SOUTH 8~ DEG, 57' 00" 4/EST 150.0~ FEET TO A LIMF
P/1RALLEL lJl TFi A~,ID EASTERLY C0. ~D FFET FROM SA I ~ CENT~R L I ~!E OF
HARBOR BOULEVARD; TNEPJCE NORTH O JEG. 1.5' 2S" 4IEST ALr?Mr. SAI~
PARALLEL LINE, 144,55 FfET 70 SAID SOUTHERLY LI~IE OF THE LAND T~
THE STATE OF Cl1LIFORNIA; THE~dCE COPJTINItiN~ ALONG S/11~ SOIITHER~Y
LINE NORTH ~~E DEG. 11' 29" EAST ~3.18 FFET A~1D PdO~TH 89 DEG. 57~
00" EAST 1~F3.B3 FEET TO THE PO I ~JT OF BEr, I Iati I ~dr,.
IJHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a puhlic hearing at the City
Nall in the City of Anahcim on February 3, 198?, at 1:3~ p.m., notice of said public
hearing having beert d~ly given as req~ired by iaw and in accor~ance with the
provisions of the Anaheim ~lunicipal Code, Chapter 1'.(?3, to hear and consider
evidenc~ for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investtnate and
mal<e findi~gs and recommendations in co~nection there~•/ith; and
WHEREAS, satd Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due considerati~n of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the prc,posed use is properly one for a~hich a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim !1unicipal Code Sectton 1R.r13,0;n,01n to ~vit: to
retain an automobile rental agency in the RS-A-43,000 zone.
2. That the proposed use is hereby granted for a period of ten (10)
months, unttl December 31, 1932; at ~~~hich time said use a~ill be subject to review for
possible extensions of time. If an extensior is granted, it shall be requlred that
the westerly driveway on 1•lanchest~r Avenue and the northerly drive~oay on Harbor
Boulevard be removed and replaced ~~tth a standard curb, qutter and sidewalk.
PC~;2-12
r::
'>:.;, .
~n srma ,.. ..._ , .. ....... .. ..
r_..` ,
3. That th~ proposed use, as grantec), ~~~ill not adversely affect the
adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in wl~ich it is
proposed to be located.
i+. That tlie size and shape of the s(te proposed for the use, as granted,
is adequate to allow the full development oP the prop~~sed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim,
5. That the granting of the Conditlonal Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, tivill not be detrimental to the peace, liealth, safety ancl general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anahr_im.
6. That the traffic generated by the pro~osed use, as granted, will not
impose an undue burden upon the streets and high~oays designecl and improved to carry
the traffic in the area.
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence ~aas received in op!~osition to the subject
petition.
EWVIROP111ENTAL IMPACT FIIJDIt~I,: That the Anaheim Citv Planning Commission has
reviewed the proposal to retain an automobile rental agency on a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately 0.5 acre located at the southeast corner
of Mancnester Avenue and Harbor Boulevard (1~E00 South liarhor P.oulevard); and does
hereby aPP~'ove the Plegative Declaration from the requirement to orepare an
environmental impact report on the basis that there ~yould be no signtficant
individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this
Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan deslgnates the sub.ject property
for commercial-recreation land uses commensurate ~•lith the proposal; that no sensttive
environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted
by the petitioner tndicate~ no significant indivi~lual or cumulative adverse
environmental impacts; and that tlie Negative Declaration substanttatin9 the foregoing
findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Pianning Departr~ent.
IJOIJ, THEREFORE, BE IT RFSOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Condittonal Use Permit, upon the followtng
conditions whtch are hereby found to be a necessary prereouisite to the proposed use
of the suhject property in order to preserve the safety and general ~~elfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1, That the otdner(s) of suhject ~ropertY shall submtt a letter requesting
termination of Conditional Use Permit Plos. 1735 and 1835 to the Planning
Department.
2, That subject property shall be develoned substanttally in accordance wtth
plans and specifications on file e•iith the Citv of Anahetm marked Exhibtt
Nos, 1 :nd 2.
3, That Condition Nos, 1 and 2, above-menttoned, shall he completed within a
period of sixty (60) days from the date l~eretn.
-2- PC8?-12
BE IT FURTtiER RE50!VED tliat the Anaheim City Plannin~ Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoptfon of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinahove set forth.
Should any sucli condition, or any part thereof, be declared invaltd or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals lierein contained, shall be deemed null and vofd.
THE FOREGOING RESOLiJTION is signed and approved by me this ~th day of
February, 1992.
~~- ~. ~~r~'
CHAIR~1AdJ~ APIAHEI'1 CITY PLP~I~IINr., COM'11SSION
ATTEST:
`~~.c~ ~ ,~~..
SECRETAf?Y, APJAHEIN CITY PLANNIN~ COMMISSIOPI
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUPITY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF Af4AHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of tF~e Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hero.by certify that tlie foregoing resolution ~•ras passed and a~fopted at a meetir~g of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on February 3, 19°7_, hy the followinq vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARPlES, BOIJAS, QUSHORE, FRY, HERPST, KIPI~, FiC, BURNEY
tJOES: COM!11SSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIOr1ERS: h1~NE
1932.
IP~ IJITPJESS IJHEREOF, I I~ave hereunto set my hand this 3th day of February,
~~ .r`- ~,,.,,.~,
SECRET~",RY, ANAHEI~1 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- Pc82-12