PC 82-14.-~~,
RESO~uTior! r~n. Pr.82-~~.
A RESOLUTION OF THE AtIAHEIM CITY PL/!NrIINr cn~~~~~sstnr~
THAT PETITIOrI FOR RFCLASSIFICATION N~. g1-32-12 BE GRArITED,
61HEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission di~i receive a~ierified
petition for Reclassification from SUMSET OF Cl1LIF~R^!IA H~MES, IPIC., a
California Corporation, 1?55 E. Valley Qoulevard, Rosemead, California Q177~,
owners, and GERl1LD REb1ER5, 1~t771 Plaza Drive, Suit° A, 7ustin, California ,
92G$D, agent, of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California, described as foll~ws:
PARCEL 4, Ir~ THE CITY OF AtJAHEIM, C~UrITY OF 0!tANGE, STATE OF
CAL I FORN IA ~ AS SH01•RJ OFI PARCEL 11AP N0. 8~-237_, F I LE~ I ~•I B001< 15~,
PAr,ES, 7 TO 11, I~ICLUSIVE OP PARCEL MAPS, t~~ THE OFFICF OP THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS~ the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on Fc:hruary ~3, 1982, at 1:3~ ~.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by laa~ an~f in accordance a~ith the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1S.n3, to hear and consider
evidence `or and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
IJHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investi9ation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and af~er due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the folloaiing facts:
1. That the petitioner pr~poses reclassification of subject oroperty from
the RS-A-~~3,~Q0 (Residential, Agricultural) Zone to thr_ R~~!-3~Q~ (Residential,
Multiple-Family) Zone.
2 Tha[ the Anaheim Generai Pian designates subject property for fow-
medium densitv residential land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of *.lie community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly
reiate to the zones and their permttted uses locally established in close proximity
to s~bject property and to the zones and their permitted u,es generally established
throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the
improvement of abutting streets in accordance ~aith the Circulation Element of the
General Plan, due to the antictpated increase in traffic which will be qenerated by
the intensification of land use.
6. That 1 person indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence i•~as received tn oppo,ition to the subJe~t
petition.
PCII2-1tE
r"~ ..-.,
ENVIROtR•fENTAL I~•iPACT FIN~i"J9: Environmental Im~act Report No. 113 a~as
previously certi ted by the City Council on 'larch 1(, 1~7~~ in conjunction with the
approval of the Anaheim Shores Plann~d Community. (Reclassification No. 73-74-3,),
NQW, THEREFORE, QE !T RESQL'iED that the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commtssion
does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, hy so doing, t`~at Title
13-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Cod~ he amended to excl~ide the above-described
property from the RS-A-h3,000 (Residential, Agrlcultural) Zone to the RM-3~00
(Residenttal, Multiple-Family) Zone, upon the following conditions ~•ihfch are hereby
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposr_d use of s~~hject property 1n order
to preserve the safe:y and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of llnaheim:
1. That sidewalks shall be installed .,long Romneya Drtve as required by the
City Engineer and in accordance ~~~ith standar~l plans and spectfications on
file in the Office of the City Engineer,
2. That the o~vner(s) of sub,ject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim a
fee, in an amount as determined by the City Council, for tree planting
purposes along Romneya Drive and La Palma Av~nue.
3. That any ~ntrance security gates shall he controlled by a nur~erical sequence
reader, as specified by Streets and Sanitation Division of the Pubiic lJorks
Department.
4. That trash storage areas shall he provided in accordance ivith approved plans
on file with the Office of the Executive ~irector of Public 4dorks.
5. That fire hydrants shall he installed and charqed as required an~1 determined
to be necessary hy the Chief of the Ftre Department nrior to commencement of
structural framing.
6, That subject propr_rty sliall be served by ~.~nder9rr~und utilities.
7. 'fhat drainage of suhject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
8. That the o~,m er of suhject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determtned to be appropriate
bY the Ctty Counctl, said fees to be paid at the ttme the hiiilding permit is
fssued,
9. That ali private streets shail be developed in accordance i•~ith the City of
Anaheim~s Standard Detail Plo. 1?2 for private streets, including
installation of street name signs. Plans for the private street lighttng,
as required by the standard detail, shall be suhntttr_d to the Building
Dtvision for approval and lnclusion with the building plans ~rior to the
issuance of bui)ding permits. (Private streets are thnse ~•~hich provide
primary access and/er circulation ~aith-n the project.)
10. That the oam er(s) of ,ubJect p mperty shall pay the traffic signal
assessment `ee (Qrdi~ance No, 3°9G) in an amount as determtned by the City
Council, for each new d~aelling unit prior tn tI~P iscuance of a building
permit.
-2- PC32-14
~LPw'.anla.[M~•~. .. . . .. .. . ..
11. That appropriate i~~ater assessment fees as determined by the Office of
Utilities General ~1anager shall be paid to the City of Ana'ieim prior to the
(ssuance of a building permit.
12. That the o~•mer(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim a
fee, in an amount as determined by the City Council, for street lighting
along La Palma Avenue.
13. Prtor to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall present evidence
satisfactory to the Chief Builcfing Inspector that the units ~vill be in
cenformance o-~itli Ploise Insulation Standards snecified in the California
Administrative Code, Title 25.
14. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall present evidence
satisfactory to thc Chief Building Inspector that t!~e proposed pro,ject is in
conformance o-rit}i Council Policy Plumber 5i2, Sound Attenuation in Restdential
Projects.
15. That subject property shail be developed substantially in accor~ance with
plans and specifications on file alith tl~e City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nos, 1 through 5.
16. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject prooerty,
Condition Nos. 2 and 12, ahove-mentioned, shall be completed. The
provisions or rights granted hy this resolution shall become null and void
by action of the Planning Commi_sion unless satd conditions are complied
with within one year from the date hereof, or such further time as the
Plannina Commission may grant.
17. That Conditfon ~Jos. 1, 4, ~, 7 and 15, above-menttoned, shall he complied
with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predtcated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition~ or any part thereof, be declared invaltd or unenforceabie
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals I~erein contained, shall be deemed null and vold.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIO~d is signed and approved by me this `?th day of
February, 1992,
_,~__~_s~_~~.
CHA I MAN, qPIAHE I M C 1 Y LA"lNTMf; COMti t SS I ON
A1'TEST:
`~ .
SECRETARY, ANAHE I t1 I TY PLl1NN I W6 C0~4M I SS I Otl
-3- PC92-14
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
ClTY OF APIAHEI~1 )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretarv of the Anaheim Cttv Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution ~aas passed and adopted :~t a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on Fehruary 3, 19$?, by the following vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARMFS, BOUAS, BUSHOP,E, FRY, HERBST, IUP~r,, MC BURNEY
NOES: C~JMMISSIO~lERS: PJOPlE
ABSENT: COMI115S I O~IERS: NONE
1~82.
IN WIT!JESS tJNEREOF, I havn here~nto set my hand this ~4th day of ~ebruary,
(~ DC.u~~.~ ~C , a'~itit~..~
SECRETARY ~ APdAHE I i1 C I TY PLA'JN I IJG CO"1!1 I SS I ON
-1F- Pf,82-14