PC 82-155~~
RESOLUTION N0. PC82-155
~
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 3282 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Peti~ion for Variance from SHELL OIL COMPANY, 511 North Brookhurst Street,
Anaheim, California 92803, owner, and D. LINDSAY & J.B. HIRD, 511 North
Brookhurst Street, Anaheim, California 92803, agent, of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California
described as:
PARCEL 1~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CCiJNTY OF ORANGE~ STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 17 PAGE 12 OF PARCEL
MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THF. COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planninq Commission did hold a public hearing at
the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on August 9, 1982, at 1:30 p.m., notice
of said public hearing having been duly given as require3 by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consiRer evidence for and against said proposed variance and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offer.ed at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes waivers of the following to retain
two canopy signs:
(a) SECTION 18.05.093.021 - Maximum number of freestanding signs
{or_e perr~itted; three er.isting)
(b) SECiION 18.05.093.0231- Minimum distance between freestanding
signs. (300 feet required;
45 and 120 feet existing)
2. That the above-mentioned waivers are hereby granted for two
signs mounted on a gasoline pump island canopy on the basis that the Planr.ing
Commission interpreted these ~igns to be informati~nal/directional type signs
and not typical free-standing advertising signs since said signs will read
"self serve" and "open 24 hours".
3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use oE the
property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the
same vicinity and zone.
4. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment o" a substantial property right possessed by other property in
the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the p.ropert,y in question.
PC82-155
.-~
,_
5• That the reque~ted variance will not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare ur injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
6• That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no cox•respondence was received in oppos::tion to subject
petition.
EAn7IRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: The Pla~ining Director or his
authorized representative has determined that the ro osed ro'
within the dafinition of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1 p P Ject fall.s
State EIR Guid=lines and is, therefore, categorically exemetined in the
requirement to prepare an ~Ig, P from the
NOW, THEREFORE, gE =T gESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1• That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the
Office of Utilities General Manager shall be paid to the City oi
Anaheim.
Z• That plans for the existing canopy signs shall be submitted to
the Building Department to show compliance with all applicable
City Codes. Permits shall be obtained as required.
3• That subject property shall be
accordance with plans and specificat ons ~ondfileb ith theyCity
of Anaheim marxed Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
4• That Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall he
completed within a period of sixty (60) ~ays frc~ the date
herein..
BE IT FURTHER R~SOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unen£orceable by the final judgment of. any cottrt of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
~.
-2- 1
PC82-155
i
~
.-.
~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 9th day of
August, 1982.
~. ~A''~~~
CH I N~ ANAHEIM CITY NNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~~ G ~ ~4~.t., ~.~.
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAIv"NING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNTA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
2, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was pas~ed and adopted at a
meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 9, 1982, by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSTONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HEREST, KING, LA CLAIRE,
MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOI~E
ABSENT: COMMISSION~RS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHErZEOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 9th day of August,
i982.
~~ ~° ~.:.
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_g_ PC82-155