71R-053
RESOLUTION NO. 7lR.-53
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETEID4INING
THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ill~AHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE ~mNDED
Al~D THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGED.
miEP~AS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
An~1eim did hold a public hearing in Reclassification Proceed-
ings "No. 70--71-25 to consider an amendment to Ti.t1e 18 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code relating to zoning, and to consider a
change in the boundaries of tile zone or zones hereinafter men-
tioned and described, and at said hearing did receive evidence
~,d reports from persons interested therein and from its staff;
and
WHEREAS, within a period of forty days fOllowing said
hearing the Planning Commission did duly adopt a resolution con-
taining a report of its findings, a s~~ary of the evidence
presented at said hearing, and a recommendation that the proposed
amendment be adopted by the City Council and that a certain zone
or zones be changed as hereinafter set forth; and
~~iEREAS, upon receipt of said resolution, summary of
evidence, report of findings and recommendation of the City
Planning Commission the City Council did fix the 2nd day of
February, 1971 as the time, and continued to the 9th day of
February, 1971, and the City Council Chambers in the City Hall
of tlle City of Anaheilu as the place for a public hearing upon
said proposed amendment to Title 18 of tile Anaheim Municipal
Code, and the exclusion of said property, hereinafter described,
from the zone or zones in which it is now situated and the in-
corporation thereof in the zone or zones hereinafter set forth,
and did give notice thereof in the manner and form as provided
in said Title 18 of ~~e Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEP~AS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City Council did hold and conduct such public hear-
ing and did give all persons interested therei.n an opportunity
to be heard, and did receive evidence and reports, and did
thereupon consider the summary of evidence presented at said
public hearing before the Planning Comrnission, its report of
findings and recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council does find and determine
that the ~~endment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code
should be adopted and that the property hereinafter described
should be excluded from the zone or zones in which it is now
situated and incorporated in the zone or zones as hereinafter
set forth.
NOW, THEREFOKE, BE IT ID~SOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code
be, and b~e same is hereby, amended and that the following
described property, situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of California, to wit:
-1--
70-71-25
.--.-....-.... ."'.."....-.. ....-...... -- ......_.4 --" ..re.II. . .............. - "-..1-". -...............__........._...-.-...."'~I'..............---...~4;._..........a-.l.. ........:~
..._._.~..___....~.........~..
Beginning at the southeasterly corner of that certain
annexation to the City of Anaheim entitled iiEsperanza-
Rotll'~; thence along the easterly line of said annexation
being also the easterly line of the land described in
the deed to Samuel Kraemer recorded September 18, 1915,
in Book 270, page 7 of Deeds, records of Orange County!
North 10 311 44:; East, 2,214.53 feet to the non-tangent
intersection with a curve in the southerly line of the
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Company right of
way, 100.00 feet in width! being concave southeasterly
and having a radius of 3,769.83 feet, said 100.00 foot
strip being shown on Orange County Surveyor's File Map
&0. 3369, said southerly line being parallel with and
120.00 feet southerly from the centerline of Esperanza
Road, as monumented and noted in Orange County Surveyor's
~ransit Book lOS, pages 17 through 20, a radial line of
said curve to said point bears North 480 35' 52B West;
tl1ence ~ortheasterly along said curve and southerly line
through a central angle of 420 451 33" an arc distance
of 2,813.38 feet; thence tangent to said curve and con-
tinuing along said southerly line North 840 09 I 41 il East.r
1,131.92 feet to a tangent curve concave northerly and
having a radius of 2,914.93 feet; thence Easterly along
said curve and said southerly line through a central
angle of 120 27 I 00 ,; an arc distance of 633.40 feet to
the tangent intersection with a course in said southerly
line, shown as having a bearing of North 7lo 04' 33u East
on a map filed in Book 37, page 33 of Records of Surveys,
records of said County~ thence along said course North
710 421 41'; East, 1,508.91 feet to the easterly line of
the property described in Parcel 1 of a deed to Virginia
Richards, recorded September 28, 1960, in Book 5438: page
79 of Official Records of said County, said easterly line
being shown on said Record of Survey. thence along said
easterly line South 60 401 31.3:: East,.. l..,286.89 feet to
tile southeast corner of said Richards propertYf thence
along the southerly line of said Richards property South
620 231 4911 west,. 1,239.37 feet to an intersection with a
line shown as having a bearing of ~'Iorth 290 22; 00;' ~vest,
and a length of 126.53 feet on Orange County Surveyor's
E"lile i:1ap Ho. 9870, sheet file number l8907."Ci thence along
said line North 290 22 I 00 i: West, 126.53 feet to a non-
tangent intersection with a curve, concave southeasterly
and having a radius of 10,220.00 feet! as shown on said
File Map No. 9870, a radial line of said curve to said
point bears l~orth 190 44il 071~ West; thence Southwesterly
along said curve t..~rough a central angle of 90 37i 53u an
arc distance of 1,717.98 feet to a tangent line, as shown
on said Pile Map uo. 9870, thence along said line South
600 381 00" VJest, 3,430.26 feet to t11e point of beginning.
be excluded from Orange County A-I, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, and
incorporated in the City of Anaheim R-2-S000 - ONE FAMILY ZONE,
subject to the following conditions:
1. That a final tract map of subject property shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be record-
ed in ttle uffice of the Orange County Recorder.
-'2-
_......:I~ ."-,: ...... ~ __... - ....:.... 4- .~ .~. n._. -. - ......... ................ _.'_~ .'-..'_.'I;"~"'.""'lI.._.....~.........--.._____.....__,,.~.. _~...__.._
2. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning
subject propertYl Condition No. 1 above mentioned shall be
completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution
shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless
said conditions are complied with within one year from the date
hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the"
City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in--lieu fees
as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees
to be paid at the tinle the building permit is issued.
4. That these reclassification proceedings are granted
subject to the completion of annexation of subject property to
the City of Anaheim.
5. That subject property shall be developed in accordance
with standards as follows:
1) That prior to the introduction of an ordinance reclassi-
fying subject property: a specific plan shall be required
for any use, subdivision, site design or the construc-
tion of any building, fence, sign or structure, or the
removal or deposit of natural material. Plans shall be
submitted indicating front, side and rear elevations,
plan view and a cross section through the proposal and
through sufficient adjacent properties to indicate the
relationship of the proposal to those properties. Plans
or drawings should also show proposed building or struc-
ture locations, and in reasonable detail walls, walks,
topography, existing vegetation, proposed parking lay-
out and location, landscape and irrigation proposals,
building and roofing materials.
2) All buildings or mobilehome coaches along La Palma
Avenue, A.T. & S.F. Railroad right-of-way and Fairmont
Boulevard, shall maintain a landscaped setback area
having a minimum depth of 50 feet. Said setbacks
shall be measured horizontally from the planned highway
right-of-way lines as indicated on the Circulation
Ele:nent of the General Plan to the building. The 50-
foot setback may be reduced to 40 feet where variations
in wall designs are provided. Variations in the re-
quired solid wall that are designed to include such
decorative materials as wrought iron, wood, stone or
landscaping are encouraged, provided that no more than
ten percent of tile required wall length consist of
variations and that no variation have a width greater
than 5 feet.
3) The entire required setback area except where driveways
cross said areas, shall be landscaped as follows:
landscaping shall consist of lawn, trees, shrubs, ground
cover and certain architectural features as listed
below. All landscaped areas shall be permanently main-
tained in a neat and orderly manner as a condition of
use and shall be provided with hose bibhs, sprinklers~
or similar permanent irrigation facilities.
-3~
.,t~... I .......... . ..on _ .'. .. .~... ......... . .~... .":100.....:, ....-~h.....-r......... .................,&............_..._. .......... ...... ...._..._......_........ .~
The following architectural features, structures, and
accessways may be permitted in the required setback
area:
a. Fountains, ponds, pools, sculpture, planters and
open or covered walkways where they are an integ-
ral part of a landscaping scheme comprised prim-
arily of plant materials.
b. Decorative screen type walls.
c. Flag poles. (Maximum of 25 feet in height)
4) Where a building site is adjacent to the A.T. & S.F.
Railroad right-Of-way, a solid decorative masonry wall,
an earthen berm or combination of the two shall be pro-
vided parallel to the right-Of-way line. The wall or
berm shall be at least six (6) feet high as measured
from the high grade side of the property line. In
order to insure privacy to the dwelling units, a wall
or berm in excess of six (6) feet in he.ight may be
approved. Adequate landscaping to fully screen to a
height of ten (10) feet the subject property from the
railroad within two (2) years, shall be provided adja-
cent to the right-of.-~way line.
5) ~Vhere a prospective building si te and/or subdivi.sion
contains a Eucalyptus tree windbreak, the developer
shall either, (1) leave the windbreak in its natural
state; (2) prune the trees to a height of not less than
25 feet 1 or; (3) reraove the existing trees and replace
them, one tree for every three trees (not necessarily
in the same location) with windbreak substitute trees.
Trees shall be at least eight (8) feet in height at the
time of planting. \ihere a prospective building site
and/or subdivision does not contain a Eucalyptus tree
windbreak, the developer shall plant trees. in windbreak
fashion along a convenient property line at the rate
of ten (10) trees per gross acre. Trees shall be
selected from the list of windbreak substitute trees at
the end of this chapter and must be at least eight (8)
feet high at the time of planting.
Any prospective building site and/or subdivision shall
not be required to have more than ten (10) windbreak
trees per gross acre.
6) All natural terrain or areas left in an undisturbed
state shall contain or shall be planted with adequate
native plant material. An irrigation system shall not
be required for these natural areas.
7) All cut or fill slopes shall be planted with adequate
plant materials and irrigated with an irrigation system
to protect the slopes against erosion. Said planting
shall consist of at least one (1) tree per 300 square
feet and one (1) shrub per 150 square feet of actual
bank slope area and a ground cover to completely cover
the bank wi thin two (2) years from the tilne of planting.
"~4-
. ..L __.... ........... "__".. _.. ~:r ..":,"... a..a,;.o;!:r.:.............,..~H...~.....-..._............l......._...._.___........~'.......~.
8) The maximum overall height of any building shall be
25 feet measured from the hi.ghest .portion of structure
to the highest finished grade level at the foundation.
9) Roof mounted equipment including exterior mounted and
ground mounted radio and television antennas shall not
be pennitted.
6. That with the exception of Condition No. 5(1), above
mentioned, all other elements of Condition No. 5 shall be complied
with prior to final building and zoning inspection.
7. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be
adopted as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertain.-
ing to such parcel, provided, however, th.at the word :1parcel Ii
shall mean presently existing parcels of record and any parcel or
parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Attorney be, and
he is hereby auulorized and directed to prepare and submit to
the City Council an ordinance amending Title 18 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code to accomplish the objects herein found and deter-
mined to be necessary and proper.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
thi.s 9th day of February, 1971.
ATTE.sT~
~'.
" ~,:f)~~ ;s~_____
CI CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
-5-
WPH:rns
.~_.. :._~. ." ..<.r . _. ~ .,. _ ~_..... for .~......... . ....~.: -::"+ ~~.. _....,. ._.'.__...~_"'_._.._I"_"""""-''''',~_,~_____-""-"-""",,,, .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 55 .
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
-"'''.
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 71R-53 was
passed and adopted at a ----- regular meeting of the City
Council held on the 9th_ day of February , 19.?L, by the following
vote of the members thereof:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thorn and
Dutton
COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT:
COUNCIU~EN: None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim
approved and signed said resolution on the 9th day of February
19 7l.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the seal of the City of Anaheim this 9th day of February __, 1971 .
~.,
! hr. U~/2.. ;~
CI CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAfmIM
(SEAL)
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby
certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 71R-53 duly
passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on February 9, 1971.
~ )no ))~~-: .~,--~
City Clerk
-".