Loading...
PC 82-156.... _.,.. RESOLUTION NO. PC82-156 R RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHF,IM CITY PLANNZNG COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 82-83-2 BE GRANTED WHEREP.S, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified petition for Reclassification from PABLO V. AND LAURA KNOWLTON DOMINGUEZ, 1523 East Santa Ana Street, Anaheim, California 92:J05, own~rs, and J.B. BIRD, ~11 North Broukhurst Street, Anaheim, California 92803, agent, of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: THE NORTH 2O3.00 PEET Or TH~ WEST 203.00 FEET OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA, CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE UF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51 PAGE 10, OF DIISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 9, 1982 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provi~ions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence £or and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports nffered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property from the RS-A-43,000 (ResidPntial, Agricultural) zone to the CL (Coaunercial, Limited) zone. 2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for general commercial land uses. 3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community. 4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community. 5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General ~lan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the intensitication of land use. PC82-156 /~- ~r~n. 6. That no one indicated their presence at said publi.c hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposit'.on to subject petition. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has r.eviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property from the RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agricultural) zone to the CL (Commercial, Limited) zone to permit two signs mounted on a gasoline pump island canopy with waivers of maximum number of freestanding si.gns and minimum distance between freestanding signs on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consistinq of approximately 0.5 acre located at the southeast corner of Ball Road and State College Boulevard, and further described as 1200 South State College Boulevard (Shell Service Station); and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that there would be no significant in3ividual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for gener.al commercial land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the initial Study submitted by the petitianer indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 2T RESOL\lED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification anu, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described property from RS-A-43,000 (P.esidential/Agricultural) zone to the CL (Conmercial, Limited) zone upon the following conP.itions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: 1. That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Office of Utilities General Manager shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to adoption of an ordinance rezoning subject property. 2. That the owner(s) o.f subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim a fee, in an amount as determined by the City Council, for tree planting purposes along Ball Road and State College Boulevard. 3. That subject property shall be ~leveloped substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. 4. That prior to the introducti~n of 3n ordinance rezoning suSject property, C~ndition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provisio~~s or rights granted by this resolution ehall become null and void bp action of the Planning Commission unless said conditions are conplied with within one year Erom the date hereof, or such further time as the Planning Comcc;ission may grant. 5. That Condition No. 3, above-mentioned, sliall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. -2- FC82-156 ,.~ BE IT FURTHER REgOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of iy expressly hereinabove set forth. Should any such condit_on, or an the conditions declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgemnt of rt thereof, be competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution anY court of contained, shall be deemed null and void. ' and any approvals herein THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this gth day of August, 1982. ~~~ ~tiAIRMAN. ,~pgEIM C7:°Y NNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY ~~ ~ ~ . ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CAI,IFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF AN~IM ) I. Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foreqoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 9, 1982. by tha following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMNIISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST MC BURNEY . KING, LA CLAIRE, NOES: Cp~y2SSIONERS: NONE AHSENT; COMbiZSSI027~RS; NONE =N WITNESS WHEREOF, I Have hereunto set my hand this 9th day of August, 1982. SECRETARY ~ p~~CITY~LAIVr7~ ^ w " NG COMMISSION -3- PC82-15h rM~w~s »v.:ti 4. 4 ~,.~...~.~ ~ ;" . ::... . . .........._..~. ~.