PC 82-162~
RESOLUTIUN NO. PC82-162
A RESOLUTION OI' THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT P~TITION FOR CONDTTIONIIL "SE PERMIT NO. 2366 BE GiZANTED, TN PART
~dHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from ANTONIO f3. RANGEL, ET AL., 318 North
Stardust Avenue, Placentia, California 92670, owner, and STEPHEN W. BRADFORD &
ASSOCIATES, P. O. Box 148, Placentia, California 92670, agent of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described as:
PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 6 OF THE GOLDEN
STATE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MTiP RECORDED IN BOOK 4 PAGES 66
AND 67 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY SHOWN AS PARCEL 2 ON A MAP RECORDED
IDi IIOOK 1 PAGE 38 OF PARCEL MAPS RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE
COUNTY.
ppigC~, p: THE SOUTHERLY 130.00 FEET OF THE F7ESTERLY 148.63
FEET OF THE SOUTHERLY 156.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 438.63
FEET OF LOT 1, IN BLOCK 6 OF THE GOLDI:i3 STATE TRACT, AS
SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGES 66 AND 67,
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID O1tANGE COU'NTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on September 8, 1982, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use
permit and to investigate and make findinqs and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the proposed use is pro~,e:ly one for which a conditional
use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.61.050.502 to
wit to retain contractors' storage yards with waivers of the following:
(a) SECTION 18.01.130 - Required Lot F.tage.
(A21 lots required to abut a public
street or alley; 2 lots not abutting)
(b) SECTION 18.61.063.013 - Minimum LandscaFed Setback.
(5 feet requirzd from local streets;
none existing)
#0193I PC82-162
~~
(c) SECT~ON 18.61.064.020 - Maximum Fence Hej.ght.
(30 inches permitted in front setback;
6 foot existing)
(d) SECTION 18.61.068.030 - Required Enclosure of Cutdoor U~es.
(Chain-linY, fence with redwood or cedar
slats required; unslatte~ chain-link
fence existing)
2. That the proposed use is hereby qranted subject to the following
stipulations made by the petitioner at the public hearing:
a. That the existing 6-foot high plywood fence adjacent to Red Gu~
Street shall be removed and replaced with a new fence
constructed at the required 5-foot wide setback; and that the
5-foot wide setback shall be irrigated and landscaped, as
required by Code.
b. That all outdoor ~torage areas sha21 be screened with slatted
chainlink fencing from adjoining properties and Red Gum Street,
as required by C~de.
c. That all inoperable vehicles shall be removed from the premises.
d. ?.,at there shall be no persons living in camper snells on the
Fremises.
e. That miscellaneous piles of debris shall be removed from the
premises.
f. That there shall h~ nn ):~~P~n3 ~f ~'+'^^ 1n `:igttZ; ur,cznit3ry and
odorous conditions on the premi~es.
g. ihat all structures shall be brought into conformance with
building code.
3. That the requested waiver (a) is hereby granted on the basis
that denial would deprive subject property of a pri~~ileqe enjoyed by ~ther
properties in the same zcne and vicinity.
4. That the requested waivers (b), (c) and (d) are hereby denied on
the basis that the petitioner stipulated at the public hearing to comply with
code requirements pertaining to minimum landscaped setback, maximum fence
heighL and required enclosure of outdoor uses; thereby eliminating the need
for said waivers.
5. That the proposad use, as granted, will not adversely affect the
adjoining land use~ and the growth and development of Lhe area in whiv-ti it is
proposed to be located.
-2- PC62-162
~
6. Th~t *he ~izP a~id suape of the cite proposed for the use, as
granted, is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a
manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the City o_° Anahein.
7. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed, if any, w.ill not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
8. That the traffic generated by the proposed u~e will not impose
an undue burden upon the streets and hiyhways desiqned and improved to carry
the traffic in the area.
9. That no one indicated their pre~ence at said pubiic hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the
subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL It+~ACT FZNDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the propocal to retain contractor's storage yards with
waiver of required lot frontage, minimum landscaped setback, maxinum fence
height and required er,closure of o~.'oor uses on a rectangularly-shaped parcel
of lan8 consisting of approximately 1.5 acres, haviny a frontage of
approximately 150 feet on the east side of Red Gum Street, and fusther
described as 1450 North Red Gum Street; and does hereby approve the Negative
Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on
the basis that there would be no significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental iapact due to the appro~al of this Negative Declaration since
the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for generaZ
industrial land uses commensurate with the preposal; that no sensitive
environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study
submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative
adver~e environmental impacts; and that the Negativ~ Declaration
substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim
Planning Department.
NOW, TH~REFORE, BE IT RESOL\lED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby qrant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the
following conditions which are herebp found to be a necessary prarequisite to
the proposed use of the subject property in order to prerequisite to the
proposed use of thc. subject property in order to preserve the ~afety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, along Red
Gum Street, including preparation of improvement plans and
installation of all improvements such as curbs and gutters,
sidewalks, street gradinq and pavement, sewer and drainaqe
facilitfes, or other appurtenant work, shall be complied with as
required by the City Engineer and in accordance with specifications
on fil.~ in the Office of the City Engineer; that street lighting
faciliti~:s alonq Red Gum Street shall be installed as required by the
~ffice of Utilities General Manager, and in accordance with
specifications on file in the Office of the Office of Utili~ie~
General Manager a~d/or that security in the form of a bond,
-3- PC82-162
~. r-~.
certificate of deposit, letter of credit or cash, in an amount and
form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the
City to guarantee the satisfactory installation of the
above-mentionad improvements. Said ~ecurity shall be posted with the
City prior to approval of the final map. The above-required
improvements shall be installed prior to commencing the ac.tivity
authorized by this zoning action or within a period of ninety (90)
3ays of approval by the Planning Commi:~sion, whichever occurs first.
2. Tnat fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
3. That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Office of
Utilities General Manager shall be paid to the City of Anaheim.
4. In the event that subject property is to be divided for the purpose
of sale, lease, or financing, a parcel map, to record the approved
division of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by
the City of Anaheim and theri be recorded in the office of the Orange
County R~corder.
5. That the panhandle of Parcel 4 shall be a minimwn of 30 feet wide for
a minimum of 50 feet from the right-of-way line of Red Gum Street.
6. That reciprocal access agreements shall be submitted te and approved
by the City Engineer prior to approval of the final parcel map.
7. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accor3ance with
approved plans on file with the Office of the Executive Director of
Public 47orks.
8. That the owner of subject property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordinance 3896), in an amount as determined by City
Council for the 1.25 acre outdoor storage area.
9. That subject propert,y shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit No. 1, provided however, that a five foot (5) fully
landscaped and irrigated setback shall be maintained along Red Gun
Street and all outdoor storage shall be fully enclosed by chainlink
fencing interwoven with redwoo9 or cedar slats, as required in Code.
10. That subject property shall be cleared of any and all outstanding
Code violations including illegal use of camper shells as residences,
keeping swine, and other nuisance conditions.
11. That the existing structures shall be brought ug to the minimum
standards of •the City of Anaheim, including the Uniform Building,
Plumbing, Electrical, Mechanical and Fire Codes as adopted by the
City of Anaheim.
_q_ PC82-162
rw.
~~•
12• That Condition Nos. ],, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 shall be completed
prior to approval of the final parcel map or within a period of
ninety (90) days of approval of thiG condit:onal Sse permit by
Planning Commission, whichever occu.rs first.
gg IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Ana~:zeim City Planning Commission doea
he~ebY find and determi:~e that adopti~:.i of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon aoplicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
y3er01habo~e set forth. Should any su~h condition, or any part thereof, be
dec7-a:ed invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
comPerent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any aPPr~vals herein
~ontained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLL'TION is signed and approved by me this 8th day of
Sep~e~e:r, 1982.
~~ ~~i'y~'~
~HA RMAN, AN EIM CIT ANNZNG COMMISSION
ATxEST;
~G7G~ ^ ~ /'+~v ~ i ~
SE TARY, AN~EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STAT~ OF CALIFORNIA )
CO~TY OF ORAN~E ) ss.
C=SY OF p~7AHEIM )
2~ Edit1'1 L. Aarris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
heYeby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
Zneeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on September 8, 1982, by
~he ~ollowing vote of the members there of:
AYES= COMM=SSIONERS: BUSHORE, FRY, HERHST, KING, MC BURNEX
DTOES~ COMM=SSIONERS: NONE
~gENT: COMM=SSIONERS: BOUAS, ~1 CLAIRE
p,$S`rAIN: COMMISSIONERS: HE~ST
IN WITP+ESS WHEREC~F, I have !:ereunto set my hand this Sth day of Septeatber,
lgg2.
~ ~ ,~ ~~~ :
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANN=NG COMMISSION
-5- PC32-162
~
~