PC 82-163r .~~
--~ .
RESOLiTTION NO. PC82-163
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOh CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2368 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Condiiional Use Permit from PREDERICK R. AND RUTH I'. SACHER, Box
249, E1 Toro, California 92630, owner, and UONAVON A. VAN OVER, 11691 New
Zealand, Cypress, California ~0630, aqent of certain real property situated in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 22 IN BLOCK IC OF THE KR]~ENiER TRACT~ AS
SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BUOK 12, PAGES 87 AND 88 OF
MISCELLANBOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CP.LIFORNIA~
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCLZ B~ AS SHOP7N ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 60, PAGE 45 OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE
C7UNTY~ CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the City Hall in tl,~ City of Anaheim on September 8, 1982 at 1:30 p.m., notice
of said publir_ hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with ~e provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use
permit and ~o investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by its~lf and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and 3etermine the
following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional
use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.61.050.605 to
wit to permit retail sales of sporting goods in the ML (Industrial, Limited)
zonp•
2, That the proposed use is hereby denied on the basis that it does
not primarily serve and is not compatible with the surrounding industrial area.
3. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land
uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be
located.
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is not
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particul.ar area nor to the peace, health, safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That the qranting of the Conditional !JSe Permit under the
con~itions imposed, if a•~y, will be detrimental to the peace, health, safety
anu general welfare of the Citizeas of the City of Anaheim.
#0194I PC82-163
6. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will impose an
undue burden upon the streets and highways desi.gned and improved to carry the
trafPic in the area.
~• That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the
subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to permit retail sales of sportinq goods
in the ML (Industrial, Limited) Zone on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land
consisting of approximately 2.0 acres, having a frontage of approximately 375
feet on the south side of La Palma Avenue, and further described as 2872 East
La Palma Avenua; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration from the
requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that there
would be no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact
due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General
Plan designates the subject property for general industrial land uses
conmensurates witr the proposal; that no sensitive envi-onmental impacts ?re
involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study subm~tted by the petitioner
indicates no siynificant individual or cumulative adverse environmental
impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing
findings is on fiZa in the City of Anaheiin Planning Department.
NUW; THE~EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does he=eby deny subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit on the
basis of the aforenentioned findings.
THE FORE~OING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 8th day of
Septeatber, 1982.
r t al sl .ned y G! - n Fry)
N, ANAHEIM CIT ING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
(Original s'~ ~'i ~'~~~~~ ~ flars;~~
~ ~~~~
SECRETARY, 1~NAHEIM CIT.Y PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a~eeting of the Anahei.m City Planning Commission held on September
8, 1982, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSFIORE, FRY, HERHST, KING, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: CO_MMISSIONERS: LA CLAIRE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of
September, 1982.
ll Ci ';,p~ c;' ~ i.., ~.. . ;~
~LC.(rl~J i .. y-; i! I~i: ./f~~~A/V~Gt/
Ov
SFCFtETARY, ANAHESM CITY PLANNING CO.MMISSION
-2-