PC 82-174' ~ ' . .:~..nAdR
. ,
r.:"a'y
l'~~', ~ . ~J. ~..
_~ ' ~%
RESOLUTION NO. PC82-174
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY YLANNING COMMTSSION
THAT PETITION FOR VARITiNCE NO. 3289 BE GR2INTED
WHEREAS the Anahein City Planni.g Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Variance from ROBERT M. & GLORIA H. MILLER, 1530 Soutli Harbor
Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92802, owners, of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California
de~cribed as:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUAP.TER OF SECTION 22,
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN
JAUN CAJON DE SAIdTA ANA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF
ORANGE COUNTY~ CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF TAE SQUTHEAST
QUARTRR OF SAID SECTION 22, SOUTH 0° 14' 30" EAST
128.40 FEET FROM THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 22, SAID
CENTER POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE
OI' CERRITOS AVENUE, FROM THE WEgT, WITH THE NORTH AND
SOUTH QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 22, SAID
POINT OF BEGINNING B~ING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE
LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO ROBERT H. INGRAM, ET AL.
RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1958 IN BOOK 4213, PAGE 81 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 89° 56' 00" EAST 660.70
FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID ENGRAM I,ANp;
THENCE NORTH 0° 15' 00" WEST 85.75 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO
CARMEN SCAL7,0 ANA WIFE P,ECOFL?ED FEBRUARY I3, 1958 IN
BOOK 4194, PAGE 511 O~' OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SCALZO LAND,
660.65 FEET i0 THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 0° 14' 30" EAST ALONG SAID
w~~ LINE OF SECTION 22, A DISTANCE OF 85.87 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
WIfEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hald a public heariny at
the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on August 23, 1982, at 1:30 p.m., notice
of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the grovisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and cor,aider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith;
said public hearing having been continued to the Planning Commission meeting
of September 20, 1982; and
#02232
PC82-174
°~' ~°,
WH~REAg, said Commission, after duP inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a waiver of the following to expand
an existing motel:
SECTIONS 18.48.066.050 - Minimum number of parking spaces
and 16.06.060.0243 (125 spaces required; 79 s aces
_ P proposed)
2• That the proposed varian~ e is hereby granted on the basis that
the petitioner stipulated at the publ..: hearing to eliminate the automobile
rental agency.
3. That the above-mentioned waiver is hereby qranted on the basis
that the petitioner demonstrated that a hardship exists in that parking demand
studies of motel parking in the Disneyland area indicate a certain percentage
of guest arrive by transportation modes other than private automobile and that
the proposed parking appears to be adequate.
4• That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the
property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the
same vicinity and zone.
5• That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in
the same vicinity aad zone, and denied to the pr.operty in question.
6• That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
~• ^_'hat no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subject
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to expand an existing motel with waiver
of minimum number of parking spaces on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land
co:~sisting of approximately 1.2 acres, having a frontage of approximately 85
feet on the east side of Harbor Aoulevard, being located approximately 780
feet south of the centerline of Manchester Avenue, and further described as
1530 South Harbor Boulevard; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration
from the requirement to prepare an Qnvironmental impact report on the basis
that there would be no significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since
the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for commercial
recreation land uses commensurate with the proposal; that that Initial Study
submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative
adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration
substantiating the foregoing Pindings is on file in the City of Anaheim
Planning Department.
-2-
PC62-174
1 : _ .
• :~
• ~,,~,~ ~~,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim CiLy Planning
Commission does hereby grant yubject Petition for Variance, upon the followinq
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of An~heim:
1• That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the Office of the Executive Director of
Public 47orks.
Z• That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Grdinance No. 3896), in an amount as determined by
the City Council, for commercial buildings prior to the issuance of
a building permit.
3• That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
4. That a passenger loading area for buses be provided on-site in
accordance with the recommendation of the City Traffic Engineer.
5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 and 8; provided, however, that the automobile rental
agency shall be eliminated.
6• That Condition Nos. 1, 3, 4 ancl 5, above-mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
7• That there shall be no on-site automobile rental agency.
BE IT FURTIigR RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Coamiission do~s
hereby Pind and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expresaly
predicated upon applican~~~ compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court o~
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any apgrovals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 20th day of
September, 1982.
_11/ ~~'~"~~-`
c.U 1 N,~ANAHEIM CITY PLANN G COMMISSION
ATTEST: /~ • •
~J{,
(0 ~I.C~i , iC . /oFC~~.~ ~
SECRETARY, AN~EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3-
PC82-174
;;~.
~~
• ~ ~°1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on September 20, 1982, by
the following vote of the members there of:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, LA CLAIRE,
MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONF.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 20th day of Septeatber
20, 1982.
~ ~ •
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-4-
PC82-174
. . ., . . . .... ... ,.,nc
~Y