PC 82-2RESOLUTIO~I I10. PC3?_-2
A RFSOLUTIO~i OF TIIE r111AHElF1 CITY PLA~ltJitlG COt1MISSIOPI
TiIF1T PETITION FOR CO~IDITIOWAL USE PERNIT tJO. 228, BE DEt~IED
~lHEREAS, the Anaheim City Plannin~ Commissi~n did receive a vertfied
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from The Southland Corporation, P, 0, E3ox
719, D~ilas, Texas 75221, owner, and Glenn ~. Llasiien, i2<<0 S. State College
doulevard, llnaheim, California ~2~06, agent of cert~in real property situated in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orarr,e, State of California, described as:
Lot G of Tract P~o. ;Q91, as per map recorded in Oook ~2. " qes 48
and 1E9 of ~1iscellaneous Itaps, in tfie Office of the Count ~ scorder
of said County.
ldIIEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hoid a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Rnaheim on January 11, 1~82, at ~:3o p.M., notice of said public
hearing having been duly ~iven as re~uired by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Ftunicipal Code, Chapter 1$.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection there~•lith; and said public hearing having
been continued from the meeting of December 28, 19F31; and
WfiEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigatinn and study made
by itself and in its behatf, and after due consideration of all evidence an~ reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for ,~hich a conditional use
permit is authorized by A.naheim Municipal Code Sectdon 1f~.n3.f13~.010 to wit: To
permit a convenience market a~ith gasoline sales.
2. Ttiat the proposed use is hareby denied c~n the basis tliat approval coutd
set an undesirable precedent and on the basis that the size of the parcel (135'x135')
is not adequate to accommodate the dual use of a conventence market and gasoline
sales.
3. That the proposed ~se will adversely affect the adjoining land uses and
the growth and dcvelcnment of the area in o-~hich it is proposed to be located,
~!. That the size and sh~pe of the site proposed for the use is not
adequate to allow the full development of the proo~sed use in a manner not
detrtmental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Ananeim.
5. That the granting of the Conditianal Use Pernit will be detrimental to
the peace, health* safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6, That the traffic generated by the proposr,d use wtll impose an undue
burden upon the streets and higtx~ays designed and improved to carry tne traffic in
the area.
PC82-2
7. That no one indicated their prr.sence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was n.ceived in oprosition to the subject
peti tion.
ENVIRONt1EtlTAL INPACT FItdDItIG: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
revie+~~ed the proposal to permit a convenience market a~ith ~asoline sales on a
rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately .45 acre located at
the north,west corncr of 13a11 Road and C,i lbert Street (7-Eleven) (at 2~t~3 I~lest E3a11
Road); and does hereby approve the flegative ~eclaration from the requirement to
prepare an environmental impact report on tl,e basis that there would be no
significant individual or cumulativc aciverse environm~ntal im~+act d_ie to the approval
of this Ilegative Declaration since the /lnaheim General Plan designates the subject
property for general commercial land uses commensurate with the ~~roposal; that no
sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study
submitted by the retitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative
adverse environmental impacts; and that the 17egative Qeclaration substantiating the
fc~regoing findings is on file in the City of llnaheim Planning Denartment.
tlOll, THEREFOP,E, CE IT P,ESOLUED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby deny subject Petition for Conditional t~se Permit on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
TIIE FOREGOIPJf RESOLUTIO'I is signed and approved by me this llth day of
January, 1982.
~~~~.~.~ ~% . ~ ~..~., Q -
CHAIP,t1At1, AtIAFIEII~ CITY PLAPlHI!!G COt1MISSIOM
ATTEST:
~i,
~O~ ,.C •) Kf/~i.i.w
SECRETNrcr, htlAliEIM CITY PLAilhllPlf, COFINISSI0~1
STATE OF CALIFOR"lIA )
COUiJTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CIIY OF /1WNIE111 1 ,
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Cortvntssion, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on January 11, 1~F2, by the following vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIOt1ERS: [iARPlES, E30UAS, [3USIIORE, IIERBST
NOES: C014MISSIO~JERS: FRY, I:ING, 11cDURNEY
A[35ENT: COMMISSIONERS: PIOPIE
I~J 1iITP1[SS WIIEREOF, I have hereunto set my I~and this llth day of January,
19~i2.
~OcQ,~k. ~ ~~~:/it ..r.
SECR[TFlRY~ AtlAHEIM CITY F'LANNIIlG COMh11SSI0N
-2- PC82-2